From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
To: Jason Wessel <jason.wessel@windriver.com>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
tglx@linutronix.de, penberg@cs.helsinki.fi,
linux-usb@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-mm@kvack.org, jmorris@namei.org, sds@tycho.nsa.gov
Subject: Re: 2.6.25-mm1: not looking good
Date: Fri, 18 Apr 2008 09:37:32 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20080418073732.GA22724@elte.hu> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <48080FE7.1070400@windriver.com>
* Jason Wessel <jason.wessel@windriver.com> wrote:
> > [...] The final initcall is init_kgdbts() and disabling KGDB
> > prevents the hang.
> That enables verbose logging of exactly what is going on and will show
> where wheels fall off the cart. If the kernel is dying silently it
> means the early exception code has completely failed in some way on
> the kernel architecture that was selected, and of course the .config
> is always useful in this case.
incidentally, just today, in overnight testing i triggered a similar
hang in the KGDB self-test:
http://redhat.com/~mingo/misc/config-Thu_Apr_17_23_46_36_CEST_2008.bad
to get a similar tree to the one i tested, pick up sched-devel/latest
from:
http://people.redhat.com/mingo/sched-devel.git/README
pick up that failing .config, do 'make oldconfig' and accept all the
defaults to get a comparable kernel to mine. (kgdb is embedded in
sched-devel.git.)
the hang was at:
[ 12.504057] Calling initcall 0xffffffff80b800c1: init_kgdbts+0x0/0x1b()
[ 12.511298] kgdb: Registered I/O driver kgdbts.
[ 12.515062] kgdbts:RUN plant and detach test
[ 12.520283] kgdbts:RUN sw breakpoint test
[ 12.524651] kgdbts:RUN bad memory access test
[ 12.529052] kgdbts:RUN singlestep breakpoint test
full log:
http://redhat.com/~mingo/misc/log-Thu_Apr_17_23_46_36_CEST_2008.bad
note that this was a 64-bit config too - our tests do a perfect mix of
50% 32-bit and 50% 64-bit kernels. So single-stepping of the kernel
broke in some circumstances.
find the boot log below. (it also includes all command line parameters)
This is the first time ever i saw the self-test in KGDB hanging, so it's
some recent non-KGDB change that provoked it or made it more likely. The
KGDB self-test runs very frequently in my bootup tests:
[ 12.508236] kgdb: Registered I/O driver kgdbts.
[ 12.511245] kgdbts:RUN plant and detach test
[ 12.517418] kgdbts:RUN sw breakpoint test
[ 12.521056] kgdbts:RUN bad memory access test
[ 12.525515] kgdbts:RUN singlestep breakpoint test
[ 12.531483] kgdbts:RUN hw breakpoint test
[ 12.536142] kgdbts:RUN hw write breakpoint test
[ 12.541007] kgdbts:RUN access write breakpoint test
[ 12.546223] kgdbts:RUN do_fork for 100 breakpoints
so the latest kgdb-light tree literally survived thousands of such tests
since it was changed last.
unfortunately, the condition was not reproducible - i booted it once
more and then it came up just fine - using the same bzImage.
there's no recent change in x86.git related to the TF flag that i could
think of to cause something like this. I checked changes to traps_64.c
and entry_64.S, and nothing suspicious.
Ingo
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-04-18 7:37 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 52+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-04-17 23:03 2.6.25-mm1: not looking good Andrew Morton
2008-04-17 23:24 ` Greg KH
2008-04-18 0:48 ` Kay Sievers
2008-04-18 1:12 ` Andrew Morton
2008-04-18 4:07 ` Andrew Morton
2008-04-17 23:24 ` Dan Williams
2008-04-17 23:40 ` Andrew Morton
2008-04-18 0:14 ` Andrew Morton
2008-04-18 3:05 ` Jason Wessel
2008-04-18 7:37 ` Ingo Molnar [this message]
2008-04-18 11:46 ` Vegard Nossum
2008-04-18 12:34 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-04-18 12:41 ` Vegard Nossum
2008-04-18 13:02 ` Jason Wessel
2008-04-18 13:22 ` Vegard Nossum
2008-04-18 13:27 ` Jason Wessel
2008-04-18 14:47 ` Vegard Nossum
2008-04-18 16:02 ` Vegard Nossum
2008-04-18 21:54 ` Jason Wessel
2008-04-17 23:55 ` Paul Moore
2008-04-18 0:04 ` Andrew Morton
2008-04-18 14:55 ` Paul Moore
2008-04-18 1:35 ` Andrew Morton
2008-04-18 14:57 ` Paul Moore
2008-04-18 5:49 ` Arjan van de Ven
2008-04-18 6:10 ` Andrew Morton
2008-04-18 7:19 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-04-18 7:28 ` Andrew Morton
2008-04-18 9:28 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-04-18 6:40 ` Pekka Enberg
2008-04-18 6:56 ` Andrew Morton
2008-04-18 7:24 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-04-18 7:25 ` Pekka Enberg
2008-04-18 10:32 ` James Morris
2008-04-18 7:09 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-04-18 7:50 ` Andrew Morton
2008-04-18 7:53 ` Andrew Morton
2008-04-18 7:57 ` Andrew Morton
2008-04-18 9:22 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-04-18 12:18 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-04-18 9:42 ` Pavel Machek
2008-04-18 15:22 ` Alan Stern
2008-04-18 11:07 ` Pavel Machek
2008-04-28 16:42 ` 2.6.25-mm1: Failing to probe IDE interface Mel Gorman
2008-04-28 16:59 ` Andrew Morton
2008-04-29 9:39 ` Mel Gorman
2008-04-28 18:44 ` Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
2008-04-29 9:43 ` Mel Gorman
2008-04-29 15:49 ` Mel Gorman
2008-04-29 16:58 ` Mel Gorman
2008-04-29 21:37 ` Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
2008-04-30 11:16 ` Mel Gorman
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20080418073732.GA22724@elte.hu \
--to=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=jason.wessel@windriver.com \
--cc=jmorris@namei.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=linux-usb@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=penberg@cs.helsinki.fi \
--cc=sds@tycho.nsa.gov \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox