From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Date: Fri, 25 Apr 2008 20:10:56 +0200 From: Andi Kleen Subject: Re: [patch 05/18] hugetlb: multiple hstates Message-ID: <20080425181056.GH3265@one.firstfloor.org> References: <20080423015302.745723000@nick.local0.net> <20080423015430.162027000@nick.local0.net> <20080425173827.GC9680@us.ibm.com> <20080425175503.GG3265@one.firstfloor.org> <20080425175249.GE9680@us.ibm.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20080425175249.GE9680@us.ibm.com> Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org Return-Path: To: Nishanth Aravamudan Cc: Andi Kleen , npiggin@suse.de, akpm@linux-foundation.org, linux-mm@kvack.org, kniht@linux.vnet.ibm.com, abh@cray.com, wli@holomorphy.com, apw@shadowen.org List-ID: On Fri, Apr 25, 2008 at 10:52:49AM -0700, Nishanth Aravamudan wrote: > On 25.04.2008 [19:55:03 +0200], Andi Kleen wrote: > > > Unnecessary initializations (and whitespace)? > > > > Actually gcc generates exactly the same code for 0 and no > > initialization. > > All supported gcc's? Then checkpatch should be fixed? 3.3-hammer did it already, 3.2 didn't. 3.2 is nominally still supposed but I don't think we care particularly about its code quality. Yes checkpatch should be fixed. -Andi -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: email@kvack.org