From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Date: Thu, 8 May 2008 00:39:14 +0200 From: Andrea Arcangeli Subject: Re: [ofa-general] Re: [PATCH 01 of 11] mmu-notifier-core Message-ID: <20080507223914.GG8276@duo.random> References: <20080507130528.adfd154c.akpm@linux-foundation.org> <20080507215840.GB8276@duo.random> <20080507222758.GD8276@duo.random> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org Return-Path: To: Roland Dreier Cc: Linus Torvalds , npiggin@suse.de, chrisw@redhat.com, rusty@rustcorp.com.au, a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl, marcelo@kvack.org, kvm-devel@lists.sourceforge.net, kanojsarcar@yahoo.com, steiner@sgi.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, avi@qumranet.com, aliguori@us.ibm.com, paulmck@us.ibm.com, linux-mm@kvack.org, holt@sgi.com, general@lists.openfabrics.org, hugh@veritas.com, Andrew Morton , dada1@cosmosbay.com, clameter@sgi.com List-ID: On Wed, May 07, 2008 at 03:31:08PM -0700, Roland Dreier wrote: > I think the point you're missing is that any patches written by > Christoph need a line like > > From: Christoph Lameter > > at the top of the body so that Christoph becomes the author when it is > committed into git. The Signed-off-by: line needs to be preserved too > of course, but it is not sufficient by itself. Ok so I see the problem Linus is referring to now (I received the hint by PM too), I thought the order of the signed-off-by was relevant, it clearly isn't or we're wasting space ;) -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: email@kvack.org