linux-mm.kvack.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Nishanth Aravamudan <nacc@us.ibm.com>
To: Hans Rosenfeld <hans.rosenfeld@amd.com>
Cc: Dave Hansen <dave@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	Hugh Dickins <hugh@veritas.com>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>,
	Jeff Chua <jeff.chua.linux@gmail.com>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
	Gabriel C <nix.or.die@googlemail.com>,
	Arjan van de Ven <arjan@linux.intel.com>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86: fix PAE pmd_bad bootup warning
Date: Thu, 8 May 2008 10:16:57 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20080508171657.GO23990@us.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20080508165111.GI12654@escobedo.amd.com>

On 08.05.2008 [18:51:11 +0200], Hans Rosenfeld wrote:
> On Thu, May 08, 2008 at 09:33:52AM -0700, Nishanth Aravamudan wrote:
> > So this seems to lend credence to Dave's hypothesis. Without, as you
> > were trying before, teaching pagemap all about hugepages, what are our
> > options?
> > 
> > Can we just skip over the current iteration of the PMD loop (would we
> > need something similar for the PTE loop for power?) if pmd_huge(pmd)?
> 
> Allowing huge pages in the page walker would affect both walk_pmd_range
> and walk_pud_range. Then either the users of the page walker need to
> know how to handle huge pages themselves (in the pmd_entry and pud_entry
> callback functions), or the page walker treats huge pages as any other
> pages (calling the pte_entry callback function).

Right, I agree *if* we allow huge pages in the walker. But AIUI, things
are broken now with hugepages in the process' address space. This is a
bug upstream and leads to hugepages leaking out of the kernel when
/proc/pid/pagemap is read. Why not, instead (as a short-term fix), skip
hugepage mappings altogether in the page-walker code?

Hrm, upon further investigation, this seems to be a pretty clear
limitation of walk_page_range(). One that is avoided in the other two
callers, i.e.

static int show_smap(struct seq_file *m, void *v)
{
...
	if (vma->vm_mm && !is_vm_hugetlb_page(vma))
		walk_page_range(vma->vm_mm, vma->vm_start, vma->vm_end,
				&smaps_walk, &mss);
...
}

static ssize_t clear_refs_write(struct file *file, const char __user *buf,
				size_t count, loff_t *ppos)
{
...
		for (vma = mm->mmap; vma; vma = vma->vm_next)
			if (!is_vm_hugetlb_page(vma))
				walk_page_range(mm, vma->vm_start, vma->vm_end,
						&clear_refs_walk, vma);
...
}

No such protection exists for

static ssize_t pagemap_read(struct file *file, char __user *buf,
			    size_t count, loff_t *ppos);

So, is there any way to either add a is_vm_hugetlb_page(vma) check into
pagemap_read()? Or can we modify walk_page_range to take the a vma and
skip the walking if is_vm_hugetlb_page(vma) is set [to avoid
complications down the road until hugepage walking is fixed]. I guess
the latter isn't possible for pagemap_read(), since we are just looking
at arbitrary addresses in the process space?

Dunno, seems quite clear that the bug is in pagemap_read(), not any
hugepage code, and that the simplest fix is to make pagemap_read() do
what the other walker-callers do, and skip hugepage regions.

Thanks,
Nish

-- 
Nishanth Aravamudan <nacc@us.ibm.com>
IBM Linux Technology Center

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>

  reply	other threads:[~2008-05-08 17:17 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 32+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <b6a2187b0805051806v25fa1272xb08e0b70b9c3408@mail.gmail.com>
     [not found] ` <20080506124946.GA2146@elte.hu>
     [not found]   ` <Pine.LNX.4.64.0805061435510.32567@blonde.site>
     [not found]     ` <alpine.LFD.1.10.0805061138580.32269@woody.linux-foundation.org>
2008-05-06 19:49       ` [PATCH] x86: fix PAE pmd_bad bootup warning Hugh Dickins
2008-05-06 20:06         ` Linus Torvalds
2008-05-06 20:30           ` Hugh Dickins
2008-05-08 16:07             ` Nishanth Aravamudan
2008-05-06 20:22         ` Hans Rosenfeld
2008-05-06 20:36           ` Hugh Dickins
2008-05-07 23:39             ` Nishanth Aravamudan
2008-05-06 20:42           ` Dave Hansen
2008-05-08 14:34             ` Hans Rosenfeld
2008-05-08 14:39               ` Hans Rosenfeld
2008-05-08 14:52               ` Dave Hansen
2008-05-08 15:11                 ` Hans Rosenfeld
2008-05-08 15:51                   ` Dave Hansen
2008-05-08 16:19                     ` Hans Rosenfeld
2008-05-08 16:33                       ` Nishanth Aravamudan
2008-05-08 16:51                         ` Hans Rosenfeld
2008-05-08 17:16                           ` Nishanth Aravamudan [this message]
2008-05-08 18:42                             ` Dave Hansen
2008-05-08 18:58                               ` Hugh Dickins
2008-05-08 19:06                                 ` Dave Hansen
2008-05-08 18:48                             ` Hugh Dickins
2008-05-08 19:49                               ` Matt Mackall
2008-05-08 20:08                                 ` Dave Hansen
2008-05-08 20:02                               ` Hans Rosenfeld
2008-05-08 20:16                                 ` Dave Hansen
2008-05-08 23:15                                 ` Dave Hansen
2008-05-14 19:01                                   ` Matt Mackall
2008-05-09  9:03                                 ` Paul Mundt
2008-05-08 16:42                       ` Dave Hansen
2008-05-08 15:44                 ` Nishanth Aravamudan
2008-05-07  4:40         ` Jeff Chua
2008-05-07  5:30           ` Hugh Dickins

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20080508171657.GO23990@us.ibm.com \
    --to=nacc@us.ibm.com \
    --cc=arjan@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=dave@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=hans.rosenfeld@amd.com \
    --cc=hpa@zytor.com \
    --cc=hugh@veritas.com \
    --cc=jeff.chua.linux@gmail.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=mingo@elte.hu \
    --cc=nix.or.die@googlemail.com \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).