From: Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com>
To: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com>
Cc: Daisuke Nishimura <nishimura@mxp.nes.nec.co.jp>,
Linux Containers <containers@lists.osdl.org>,
Linux MM <linux-mm@kvack.org>,
Balbir Singh <balbir@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Pavel Emelyanov <xemul@openvz.org>,
YAMAMOTO Takashi <yamamoto@valinux.co.jp>,
Hugh Dickins <hugh@veritas.com>,
"IKEDA, Munehiro" <m-ikeda@ds.jp.nec.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/4] swapcgroup(v2)
Date: Thu, 22 May 2008 23:32:07 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20080522233207.6ddfa884@bree.surriel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20080523121027.b0eecfa0.kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com>
On Fri, 23 May 2008 12:10:27 +0900
KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com> wrote:
> On Thu, 22 May 2008 22:26:55 -0400
> Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com> wrote:
>
> > Even worse is that a cgroup has NO CONTROL over how much
> > of its memory is kept in RAM and how much is swapped out.
> Could you explain "NO CONTROL" ? cgroup has LRU....
> 'how mucch memory should be swapped out from memory' is well controlled
> in the VM besides LRU logic ?
The kernel controls what is swapped out. The userland
processes in the cgroup can do nothing to reduce their
swap usage.
> Consider following system. (and there is no swap controller.)
> Memory 4G. Swap 1G. with 2 cgroups A, B.
>
> state 1) swap is not used.
> A....memory limit to be 1G no swap usage memory_usage=0M
> B....memory limit to be 1G no swap usage memory_usage=0M
>
> state 2) Run a big program on A.
> A....memory limit to be 1G and try to use 1.7G. uses 700MBytes of swap.
> memory_usage=1G swap_usage=700M
> B....memory_usage=0M
>
> state 3) A some of programs ends in 'A'
> A....memory_usage=500M swap_usage=700M
> B....memory_usage=0M.
>
> state 4) Run a big program on B.
> A...memory_usage=500M swap_usage=700M.
> B...memory_usage=1G swap_usage=300M
>
> Group B can only use 1.3G because of unfair swap use of group A.
> But users think why A uses 700M of swap with 500M of free memory....
>
> If we don't have limitation to swap, we'll have to innovate a way to move swap
> to memory in some reasonable logic.
OK, I see the use case.
In the above example, it would be possible for cgroup A
to have only 800MB of anonymous memory total, in addition
to 400MB of page cache. The page cache could push the
anonymous memory into swap, indirectly penalizing how much
memory cgroup B can use.
Of course, it could be argued that the system should just
be run with enough swap space, but that is another story :)
--
All rights reversed.
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-05-23 3:32 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 42+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-05-22 6:13 [PATCH 0/4] swapcgroup(v2) Daisuke Nishimura
2008-05-22 6:17 ` [PATCH 1/4] swapcgroup: add cgroup files Daisuke Nishimura
2008-05-22 6:18 ` [PATCH 2/4] swapcgroup: add member to swap_info_struct for cgroup Daisuke Nishimura
2008-05-22 7:23 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2008-05-22 8:46 ` Daisuke Nishimura
2008-05-22 9:35 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2008-05-22 6:20 ` [PATCH 3/4] swapcgroup: implement charge/uncharge Daisuke Nishimura
2008-05-22 7:37 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2008-05-23 11:52 ` Daisuke Nishimura
2008-05-26 0:57 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2008-05-27 13:42 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2008-05-22 6:22 ` [PATCH 4/4] swapcgroup: modify vm_swap_full for cgroup Daisuke Nishimura
2008-05-22 6:45 ` YAMAMOTO Takashi
2008-05-22 12:34 ` Daisuke Nishimura
2008-05-25 23:35 ` YAMAMOTO Takashi
2008-05-22 7:39 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2008-05-22 8:00 ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2008-05-22 12:22 ` Daisuke Nishimura
2008-05-22 12:32 ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2008-05-23 12:26 ` Daisuke Nishimura
2008-05-22 7:44 ` [PATCH 0/4] swapcgroup(v2) KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2008-05-23 2:10 ` Daisuke Nishimura
2008-05-23 2:42 ` Daisuke Nishimura
2008-05-22 21:27 ` Balbir Singh
2008-05-23 4:27 ` Daisuke Nishimura
2008-05-27 7:31 ` YAMAMOTO Takashi
2008-05-27 7:42 ` Balbir Singh
2008-05-27 8:30 ` Daisuke Nishimura
2008-05-27 13:18 ` Balbir Singh
2008-05-27 13:42 ` Daisuke Nishimura
2008-05-27 13:46 ` Balbir Singh
2008-05-27 14:00 ` Daisuke Nishimura
2008-05-23 2:26 ` Rik van Riel
2008-05-23 3:10 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2008-05-23 3:32 ` Rik van Riel [this message]
2008-05-23 3:59 ` Balbir Singh
2008-05-23 4:30 ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2008-05-23 4:51 ` Balbir Singh
2008-05-23 5:23 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2008-05-23 5:29 ` David Singleton
2008-05-23 6:00 ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2008-05-23 6:45 ` Balbir Singh
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20080522233207.6ddfa884@bree.surriel.com \
--to=riel@redhat.com \
--cc=balbir@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=containers@lists.osdl.org \
--cc=hugh@veritas.com \
--cc=kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=m-ikeda@ds.jp.nec.com \
--cc=nishimura@mxp.nes.nec.co.jp \
--cc=xemul@openvz.org \
--cc=yamamoto@valinux.co.jp \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).