From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Date: Fri, 23 May 2008 07:30:22 +0200 From: Nick Piggin Subject: Re: [patch 12/18] hugetlbfs: support larger than MAX_ORDER Message-ID: <20080523053022.GL13071@wotan.suse.de> References: <20080423015302.745723000@nick.local0.net> <20080423015430.965631000@nick.local0.net> <1209589263.4461.35.camel@nimitz.home.sr71.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1209589263.4461.35.camel@nimitz.home.sr71.net> Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org Return-Path: To: Dave Hansen Cc: akpm@linux-foundation.org, linux-mm@kvack.org, andi@firstfloor.org, kniht@linux.vnet.ibm.com, nacc@us.ibm.com, abh@cray.com, wli@holomorphy.com List-ID: On Wed, Apr 30, 2008 at 02:01:03PM -0700, Dave Hansen wrote: > On Wed, 2008-04-23 at 11:53 +1000, npiggin@suse.de wrote: > > +static int __init alloc_bm_huge_page(struct hstate *h) > > I was just reading one of Jon's patches, and saw this. Could we expand > the '_bm_' to '_boot_'? Or, maybe rename to bootmem_alloc_hpage()? > 'bm' just doesn't seem to register in my teeny brain. OK, I agree. They aren't called too often, so I've changed all bm to bootmem there. -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: email@kvack.org