From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Date: Fri, 23 May 2008 14:09:35 +0100 Subject: Re: max_mapnr config option Message-ID: <20080523130935.GA23176@shadowen.org> References: <1207340609.26869.20.camel@nimitz.home.sr71.net> <20080407091756.GC17915@shadowen.org> <87iqyuhth2.fsf@saeurebad.de> <20080408105137.GD17915@shadowen.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20080408105137.GD17915@shadowen.org> From: apw@shadowen.org Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org Return-Path: To: Johannes Weiner Cc: Dave Hansen , linux-mm , Jeremy Fitzhardinge List-ID: On Tue, Apr 08, 2008 at 11:51:38AM +0100, Andy Whitcroft wrote: > On Mon, Apr 07, 2008 at 12:03:53PM +0200, Johannes Weiner wrote: > > Hi, > > > > Andy Whitcroft writes: > > > > > BUT. Looking over the actual references, there is a lot of references > > > occuring out of show_mem implementations in the arches which may well break > > > unless they follow suit. We also don't have any show_mem implementation > > > for sparsemem. I will have a look at what can be trivially cleaned > > > up here. > > > > Perhaps you might be interested in http://lkml.org/lkml/2008/4/4/ . > > How annoying is that, you have done the same thing I've just done. I'll > look at your version and base off that. Whatever happened to this series. I don't see it committed anywhere. Do you have a latest stack I could rebase my max_mapnr fixes off? -apw -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: email@kvack.org