From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Date: Fri, 23 May 2008 16:29:56 +0200 From: Andi Kleen Subject: Re: [patch 17/18] x86: add hugepagesz option on 64-bit Message-ID: <20080523142956.GI31727@one.firstfloor.org> References: <20080423015302.745723000@nick.local0.net> <20080423015431.462123000@nick.local0.net> <20080430204841.GD6903@us.ibm.com> <20080523054133.GO13071@wotan.suse.de> <20080523104327.GG31727@one.firstfloor.org> <20080523123436.GA25172@wotan.suse.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20080523123436.GA25172@wotan.suse.de> Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org Return-Path: To: Nick Piggin Cc: Andi Kleen , Nishanth Aravamudan , akpm@linux-foundation.org, linux-mm@kvack.org, kniht@linux.vnet.ibm.com, abh@cray.com, wli@holomorphy.com List-ID: > Oh, maybe you misunderstand what I meant: I think the multiple hugepages > stuff is nice, and definitely should go in. But I think that if there is > any more disagreement over the userspace APIs, then we should just merge What disagreement was there? (sorry didn't notice it) AFAIK the patchkit does not change any user interfaces except for adding a few numbers to one line of /proc/meminfo and a few other sysctls which seems hardly like a big change (and calling that a "API" would be making a mountain out of a molehill) -Andi -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: email@kvack.org