From: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@redhat.com>
To: Christoph Lameter <clameter@sgi.com>
Cc: Pekka J Enberg <penberg@cs.helsinki.fi>,
mpm@selenic.com, linux-mm@kvack.org,
David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Subject: Re: Subject: Slab allocators: Remove kmem_cache_name() to fix invalid frees
Date: Wed, 28 May 2008 17:32:05 -0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20080528203205.GL30251@ghostprotocols.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.64.0805281032290.22637@schroedinger.engr.sgi.com>
Em Wed, May 28, 2008 at 10:40:39AM -0700, Christoph Lameter escreveu:
> kmem_cache_name() is used only by the networking subsystem in order to retrieve
> a char * pointer that was passed to kmem_cache_create(). The name of the
> slab was created dynamically by the network subsystem and therefore there
> is a need to free the name when the slab is no longer in use.
>
> This use creates a dependency on the internal workings of the slab
> allocator. It assumes that the slab allocator stores a pointer to the
> string passed in at kmem_cache_create and that the pointer can be
> retrieved later until the slab is destroyed.
>
> SLUB does not follow that expectation for merged slabs. In that case the
> slab name passed to kmem_cache_create() may only be used to create a
> symlink in /sys/kernel/slab. The "name" of the slab that will be returned
> on kmem_cache_name() is the name of the first kmem_cache_create() that
> caused a slab of a certain size to be created.
>
> This can lead to double frees or the freeing of a string constant when
> a slab is destroyed by the network subsystem by the following action in
> ccid_kmem_cache_destroy() (DCCP protocol) and in proto_unregister().
>
> 1. Retrieving the slab name via kmem_cache_name()
> 2. Destroying the slab cache by calling kmem_cache_destroy().
> 3. Freeing the slab name via kfree().
>
> It seems that it is rare to trigger invalid kfrees because the slabs
> with the dynamic names are rarely created (at least on my systems) and
> then destroyed. In many cases it seems that the first name is the actual
> name of slab because of the uniqueness of the slab characteristics. I only
> found these while testing with cpu_alloc patches that influenced the
> sizes of these structures. But I am sure this can also be triggered under
> other conditions.
>
> Fix:
>
> Create special fields in the networking structs to store a pointer to
> names of slab generated. The pointer is then used to free the name of
> the slab after the slab was destroyed.
>
> Drop the support for kmem_cache_name from all slab allocators.
>
> Signed-off-by: Christoph Lameter <clameter@sgi.com>
I'm ok with this, thanks,
Acked-by: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@redhat.com>
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>
prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-05-28 20:32 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-05-28 17:40 Subject: Slab allocators: Remove kmem_cache_name() to fix invalid frees Christoph Lameter
2008-05-28 17:51 ` Matt Mackall
2008-05-28 17:58 ` Christoph Lameter
2008-05-28 18:23 ` Christoph Lameter
2008-05-28 19:48 ` Pekka Enberg
2008-05-28 20:32 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20080528203205.GL30251@ghostprotocols.net \
--to=acme@redhat.com \
--cc=clameter@sgi.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=mpm@selenic.com \
--cc=penberg@cs.helsinki.fi \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).