From: Nishanth Aravamudan <nacc@us.ibm.com>
To: npiggin@suse.de
Cc: linux-mm@kvack.org, kniht@us.ibm.com, andi@firstfloor.org,
agl@us.ibm.com, abh@cray.com, joachim.deguara@amd.com
Subject: Re: [patch 05/23] hugetlb: multi hstate proc files
Date: Wed, 28 May 2008 22:44:39 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20080529054439.GB1423@us.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20080529050703.GA27288@us.ibm.com>
On 28.05.2008 [22:07:03 -0700], Nishanth Aravamudan wrote:
> On 26.05.2008 [00:23:22 +1000], npiggin@suse.de wrote:
> > Convert /proc output code over to report multiple hstates
> >
> > I chose to just report the numbers in a row, in the hope
> > to minimze breakage of existing software. The "compat" page size
> > is always the first number.
>
> I'm assuming this is just copied from the old changelog, because as far
> as I can tell, and from my quick testing just now with my sysfs patch,
> hstates[0] is just whichever hugepage size is registered first. So that
> either means by "compat" you meant the default on the current system
> (which is only compatible with boots having the same order of boot-line
> parameters) or we need to fix this patch to put HPAGE_SIZE (which we
> haven't changed, per se) to be in hstates[0]. It might help to have a
> helper macro called default_hstate (or a comment) [which I thought we
> had in the beginnning of the patchset, but I see one of the intervening
> patches removed it] indicating which state is the default when none is
> specified.
>
> The reason I bring this up is that I have my sysfs patchset in two
> parts. First, I add the sysfs interface and then I remove the
> multi-valued proc files. But for the latter, I rely on hstates[0] to be
> the one we want to be presenting in proc. If that's not the case, how
> should I be determining which hstate is the default? If that is the
> case, shall I make the reverting patch also put the "right" value in
> hstates[0]?
Oh, I think I know what is going on now. It's because I hadn't changed
my test script between the old version of the stack and this one so it
was still putting "hugepagesz=64k hugepagesz=16m hugepagesz=16g" on the
kernel command-line, thus making 64k (the first hugepagesz specified) be
the default for the system. So, actually, using hstates[0] in this way
does work. Running one more test set without specifying any hugepagesz
options on the kernel command-line to see the default layout in proc and
sys is sane.
However, this nuance definitely should be documented in
vm/hugetlbpage.txt / kernel-parameters.txt. Administrators who wish to
preallocate hugepages should be aware that the order in which they
specify the preallocation affects which hugepage size is the default
(presuming my interpretation of my results is correct).
Thanks,
Nish
--
Nishanth Aravamudan <nacc@us.ibm.com>
IBM Linux Technology Center
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-05-29 5:44 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 88+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-05-25 14:23 [patch 00/23] multi size, giant hugetlb support, 1GB for x86, 16GB for powerpc npiggin
2008-05-25 14:23 ` [patch 01/23] hugetlb: fix lockdep error npiggin
2008-05-27 16:30 ` Nishanth Aravamudan
2008-05-27 19:55 ` Adam Litke
2008-05-25 14:23 ` [patch 02/23] hugetlb: factor out huge_new_page npiggin
2008-05-27 16:31 ` Nishanth Aravamudan
2008-05-27 20:03 ` Adam Litke
2008-05-25 14:23 ` [patch 03/23] hugetlb: modular state npiggin
2008-05-27 16:44 ` Nishanth Aravamudan
2008-05-28 8:40 ` Nick Piggin
2008-05-27 20:38 ` Adam Litke
2008-05-28 9:13 ` Nick Piggin
2008-05-25 14:23 ` [patch 04/23] hugetlb: multiple hstates npiggin
2008-05-27 16:52 ` Nishanth Aravamudan
2008-05-27 20:43 ` Adam Litke
2008-05-25 14:23 ` [patch 05/23] hugetlb: multi hstate proc files npiggin
2008-05-29 5:07 ` Nishanth Aravamudan
2008-05-29 5:44 ` Nishanth Aravamudan [this message]
2008-05-29 6:30 ` Nishanth Aravamudan
2008-05-29 9:04 ` Nick Piggin
2008-05-25 14:23 ` [patch 06/23] hugetlbfs: per mount hstates npiggin
2008-05-27 16:58 ` Nishanth Aravamudan
2008-05-27 20:50 ` Adam Litke
2008-05-25 14:23 ` [patch 07/23] hugetlb: multi hstate sysctls npiggin
2008-05-27 21:00 ` Adam Litke
2008-05-28 9:59 ` Nick Piggin
2008-05-29 4:59 ` Nishanth Aravamudan
2008-05-29 5:36 ` Nishanth Aravamudan
2008-05-29 8:59 ` Nick Piggin
2008-05-29 6:39 ` [RFC][PATCH 1/2] hugetlb: present information in sysfs Nishanth Aravamudan
2008-05-29 6:42 ` [RFC][PATCH 2/2] hugetlb: remove multi-valued proc files Nishanth Aravamudan
2008-05-30 3:51 ` Nick Piggin
2008-05-30 7:43 ` Nishanth Aravamudan
2008-05-30 2:58 ` [RFC][PATCH 1/2] hugetlb: present information in sysfs Greg KH
2008-05-30 3:37 ` Nick Piggin
2008-05-30 4:21 ` Greg KH
2008-05-30 4:28 ` Nick Piggin
2008-05-30 7:44 ` Nishanth Aravamudan
2008-05-30 7:41 ` Nishanth Aravamudan
2008-05-30 13:40 ` Adam Litke
2008-05-30 7:39 ` Nishanth Aravamudan
2008-05-25 14:23 ` [patch 08/23] hugetlb: abstract numa round robin selection npiggin
2008-05-27 17:01 ` Nishanth Aravamudan
2008-05-27 21:02 ` Adam Litke
2008-05-25 14:23 ` [patch 09/23] mm: introduce non panic alloc_bootmem npiggin
2008-05-25 14:23 ` [patch 10/23] mm: export prep_compound_page to mm npiggin
2008-05-27 21:05 ` Adam Litke
2008-05-25 14:23 ` [patch 11/23] hugetlb: support larger than MAX_ORDER npiggin
2008-05-27 21:23 ` Adam Litke
2008-05-28 10:22 ` Nick Piggin
2008-05-25 14:23 ` [patch 12/23] hugetlb: support boot allocate different sizes npiggin
2008-05-27 17:04 ` Nishanth Aravamudan
2008-05-27 21:28 ` Adam Litke
2008-05-28 10:57 ` Nick Piggin
2008-05-28 14:01 ` Nick Piggin
2008-05-28 14:35 ` Adam Litke
2008-05-25 14:23 ` [patch 13/23] hugetlb: printk cleanup npiggin
2008-05-27 17:05 ` Nishanth Aravamudan
2008-05-27 21:30 ` Adam Litke
2008-05-25 14:23 ` [patch 14/23] hugetlb: introduce huge_pud npiggin
2008-05-26 11:09 ` Hugh Dickins
2008-05-27 2:24 ` Nick Piggin
2008-05-25 14:23 ` [patch 15/23] x86: support GB hugepages on 64-bit npiggin
2008-05-27 21:35 ` Adam Litke
2008-05-25 14:23 ` [patch 16/23] x86: add hugepagesz option " npiggin
2008-05-25 14:23 ` [patch 17/23] hugetlb: do not always register default HPAGE_SIZE huge page size npiggin
2008-05-27 21:39 ` Adam Litke
2008-05-25 14:23 ` [patch 18/23] hugetlb: allow arch overried hugepage allocation npiggin
2008-05-27 21:41 ` Adam Litke
2008-05-25 14:23 ` [patch 19/23] powerpc: function to allocate gigantic hugepages npiggin
2008-05-27 21:44 ` Adam Litke
2008-05-25 14:23 ` [patch 20/23] powerpc: scan device tree for gigantic pages npiggin
2008-05-27 21:47 ` Adam Litke
2008-05-25 14:23 ` [patch 21/23] powerpc: define support for 16G hugepages npiggin
2008-05-25 14:23 ` [patch 22/23] fs: check for statfs overflow npiggin
2008-05-27 17:14 ` Nishanth Aravamudan
2008-05-27 17:19 ` Jon Tollefson
2008-05-28 9:02 ` Nick Piggin
2008-05-29 23:56 ` Andreas Dilger
2008-05-30 0:12 ` Nishanth Aravamudan
2008-05-30 1:14 ` Nick Piggin
2008-06-02 3:16 ` Andreas Dilger
2008-06-03 3:27 ` Nick Piggin
2008-06-03 17:17 ` Andreas Dilger
2008-05-25 14:23 ` [patch 23/23] powerpc: support multiple hugepage sizes npiggin
2008-05-27 17:14 ` Nishanth Aravamudan
2008-05-28 8:49 ` Nick Piggin
2008-05-25 14:42 ` [patch 00/23] multi size, giant hugetlb support, 1GB for x86, 16GB for powerpc Nick Piggin
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20080529054439.GB1423@us.ibm.com \
--to=nacc@us.ibm.com \
--cc=abh@cray.com \
--cc=agl@us.ibm.com \
--cc=andi@firstfloor.org \
--cc=joachim.deguara@amd.com \
--cc=kniht@us.ibm.com \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=npiggin@suse.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).