From: Nick Piggin <npiggin@suse.de>
To: Nishanth Aravamudan <nacc@us.ibm.com>
Cc: linux-mm@kvack.org, kniht@us.ibm.com, andi@firstfloor.org,
agl@us.ibm.com, abh@cray.com, joachim.deguara@amd.com
Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH 2/2] hugetlb: remove multi-valued proc files.
Date: Fri, 30 May 2008 05:51:23 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20080530035123.GB25792@wotan.suse.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20080529064242.GD11357@us.ibm.com>
On Wed, May 28, 2008 at 11:42:42PM -0700, Nishanth Aravamudan wrote:
> Now that we present the same information in a cleaner way in sysfs, we
> can remove the duplicate information and interfaces from procfs (and
> consider them to be the legacy interface). The proc interface only
> controls the default hugepage size, which is either
>
> a) the first one specified via hugepagesz= on the kernel command-line, if any
> b) the legacy huge page size, otherwise
>
> All other hugepage size pool manipulations can occur through sysfs.
>
> Signed-off-by: Nishanth Aravamudan <nacc@us.ibm.com>
>
> ---
> Note, this does end up making the manipulation and validation of
> multiple hstates impossible without sysfs enabled and mounted. As such,
I don't think that's such a problem. The overlap between users with
no sysfs and those that use multiple hugepages won't be large. And
if any exist, they can specify at boot or come up with their own
customer solution.
> I'm not sure if this is the right approach and perhaps we should be
> leaving the multi-valued proc files in place (but not as the preferred
> interface). Or we could present the values in procfs only if SYSFS is
> not enabled in the kernel? I imagine (but am not 100% sure) that the
> only current architecture where this might be important is SUPERH?
I wouldn't worry too much. I think /proc/sys/vm/nr_hugepages etc
is better as one (the compat) value after we now have the sysfs
stuff. However /proc/meminfo is a little more tricky. Of course
the information does exist in sysfs too, but meminfo is also for
user reporting, so maybe it will be better to leave it multi
column?
> Nick, this includes the fix to make hugepages_treat_as_movable
> single-valued again, which presumably will get thrown up as a merge
> conflict if it's fixed at the right place in the stack.
Thanks.
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-05-30 3:51 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 88+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-05-25 14:23 [patch 00/23] multi size, giant hugetlb support, 1GB for x86, 16GB for powerpc npiggin
2008-05-25 14:23 ` [patch 01/23] hugetlb: fix lockdep error npiggin
2008-05-27 16:30 ` Nishanth Aravamudan
2008-05-27 19:55 ` Adam Litke
2008-05-25 14:23 ` [patch 02/23] hugetlb: factor out huge_new_page npiggin
2008-05-27 16:31 ` Nishanth Aravamudan
2008-05-27 20:03 ` Adam Litke
2008-05-25 14:23 ` [patch 03/23] hugetlb: modular state npiggin
2008-05-27 16:44 ` Nishanth Aravamudan
2008-05-28 8:40 ` Nick Piggin
2008-05-27 20:38 ` Adam Litke
2008-05-28 9:13 ` Nick Piggin
2008-05-25 14:23 ` [patch 04/23] hugetlb: multiple hstates npiggin
2008-05-27 16:52 ` Nishanth Aravamudan
2008-05-27 20:43 ` Adam Litke
2008-05-25 14:23 ` [patch 05/23] hugetlb: multi hstate proc files npiggin
2008-05-29 5:07 ` Nishanth Aravamudan
2008-05-29 5:44 ` Nishanth Aravamudan
2008-05-29 6:30 ` Nishanth Aravamudan
2008-05-29 9:04 ` Nick Piggin
2008-05-25 14:23 ` [patch 06/23] hugetlbfs: per mount hstates npiggin
2008-05-27 16:58 ` Nishanth Aravamudan
2008-05-27 20:50 ` Adam Litke
2008-05-25 14:23 ` [patch 07/23] hugetlb: multi hstate sysctls npiggin
2008-05-27 21:00 ` Adam Litke
2008-05-28 9:59 ` Nick Piggin
2008-05-29 4:59 ` Nishanth Aravamudan
2008-05-29 5:36 ` Nishanth Aravamudan
2008-05-29 8:59 ` Nick Piggin
2008-05-29 6:39 ` [RFC][PATCH 1/2] hugetlb: present information in sysfs Nishanth Aravamudan
2008-05-29 6:42 ` [RFC][PATCH 2/2] hugetlb: remove multi-valued proc files Nishanth Aravamudan
2008-05-30 3:51 ` Nick Piggin [this message]
2008-05-30 7:43 ` Nishanth Aravamudan
2008-05-30 2:58 ` [RFC][PATCH 1/2] hugetlb: present information in sysfs Greg KH
2008-05-30 3:37 ` Nick Piggin
2008-05-30 4:21 ` Greg KH
2008-05-30 4:28 ` Nick Piggin
2008-05-30 7:44 ` Nishanth Aravamudan
2008-05-30 7:41 ` Nishanth Aravamudan
2008-05-30 13:40 ` Adam Litke
2008-05-30 7:39 ` Nishanth Aravamudan
2008-05-25 14:23 ` [patch 08/23] hugetlb: abstract numa round robin selection npiggin
2008-05-27 17:01 ` Nishanth Aravamudan
2008-05-27 21:02 ` Adam Litke
2008-05-25 14:23 ` [patch 09/23] mm: introduce non panic alloc_bootmem npiggin
2008-05-25 14:23 ` [patch 10/23] mm: export prep_compound_page to mm npiggin
2008-05-27 21:05 ` Adam Litke
2008-05-25 14:23 ` [patch 11/23] hugetlb: support larger than MAX_ORDER npiggin
2008-05-27 21:23 ` Adam Litke
2008-05-28 10:22 ` Nick Piggin
2008-05-25 14:23 ` [patch 12/23] hugetlb: support boot allocate different sizes npiggin
2008-05-27 17:04 ` Nishanth Aravamudan
2008-05-27 21:28 ` Adam Litke
2008-05-28 10:57 ` Nick Piggin
2008-05-28 14:01 ` Nick Piggin
2008-05-28 14:35 ` Adam Litke
2008-05-25 14:23 ` [patch 13/23] hugetlb: printk cleanup npiggin
2008-05-27 17:05 ` Nishanth Aravamudan
2008-05-27 21:30 ` Adam Litke
2008-05-25 14:23 ` [patch 14/23] hugetlb: introduce huge_pud npiggin
2008-05-26 11:09 ` Hugh Dickins
2008-05-27 2:24 ` Nick Piggin
2008-05-25 14:23 ` [patch 15/23] x86: support GB hugepages on 64-bit npiggin
2008-05-27 21:35 ` Adam Litke
2008-05-25 14:23 ` [patch 16/23] x86: add hugepagesz option " npiggin
2008-05-25 14:23 ` [patch 17/23] hugetlb: do not always register default HPAGE_SIZE huge page size npiggin
2008-05-27 21:39 ` Adam Litke
2008-05-25 14:23 ` [patch 18/23] hugetlb: allow arch overried hugepage allocation npiggin
2008-05-27 21:41 ` Adam Litke
2008-05-25 14:23 ` [patch 19/23] powerpc: function to allocate gigantic hugepages npiggin
2008-05-27 21:44 ` Adam Litke
2008-05-25 14:23 ` [patch 20/23] powerpc: scan device tree for gigantic pages npiggin
2008-05-27 21:47 ` Adam Litke
2008-05-25 14:23 ` [patch 21/23] powerpc: define support for 16G hugepages npiggin
2008-05-25 14:23 ` [patch 22/23] fs: check for statfs overflow npiggin
2008-05-27 17:14 ` Nishanth Aravamudan
2008-05-27 17:19 ` Jon Tollefson
2008-05-28 9:02 ` Nick Piggin
2008-05-29 23:56 ` Andreas Dilger
2008-05-30 0:12 ` Nishanth Aravamudan
2008-05-30 1:14 ` Nick Piggin
2008-06-02 3:16 ` Andreas Dilger
2008-06-03 3:27 ` Nick Piggin
2008-06-03 17:17 ` Andreas Dilger
2008-05-25 14:23 ` [patch 23/23] powerpc: support multiple hugepage sizes npiggin
2008-05-27 17:14 ` Nishanth Aravamudan
2008-05-28 8:49 ` Nick Piggin
2008-05-25 14:42 ` [patch 00/23] multi size, giant hugetlb support, 1GB for x86, 16GB for powerpc Nick Piggin
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20080530035123.GB25792@wotan.suse.de \
--to=npiggin@suse.de \
--cc=abh@cray.com \
--cc=agl@us.ibm.com \
--cc=andi@firstfloor.org \
--cc=joachim.deguara@amd.com \
--cc=kniht@us.ibm.com \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=nacc@us.ibm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).