From: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
To: righi.andrea@gmail.com
Cc: balbir@linux.vnet.ibm.com, linux-mm@kvack.org,
skumar@linux.vnet.ibm.com, yamamoto@valinux.co.jp,
menage@google.com, lizf@cn.fujitsu.com,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, xemul@openvz.org,
kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com
Subject: Re: [-mm][PATCH 2/4] Setup the memrlimit controller (v5)
Date: Wed, 11 Jun 2008 15:55:30 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20080611155530.099a54d6.akpm@linux-foundation.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <485055FF.9020500@gmail.com>
On Thu, 12 Jun 2008 00:47:27 +0200
Andrea Righi <righi.andrea@gmail.com> wrote:
> Andrew Morton wrote:
> >> At least we could add something like:
> >>
> >> #ifdef CONFIG_32BIT
> >> #define PAGE_ALIGN64(addr) (((((addr)+PAGE_SIZE-1))>>PAGE_SHIFT)<<PAGE_SHIFT)
> >> #else
> >> #define PAGE_ALIGN64(addr) PAGE_ALIGN(addr)
> >> #endif
> >>
> >> But IMHO the single PAGE_ALIGN64() implementation is more clear.
> >
> > No, we should just fix PAGE_ALIGN. It should work correctly when
> > passed a long-long. Otherwse it's just a timebomb.
> >
> > This:
> >
> > #define PAGE_ALIGN(addr) ({ \
> > typeof(addr) __size = PAGE_SIZE; \
> > typeof(addr) __mask = PAGE_MASK; \
> > (addr + __size - 1) & __mask; \
> > })
> >
> > (with a suitable comment) does what we want. I didn't check to see
> > whether this causes the compiler to generate larger code, but it
> > shouldn't.
> >
>
> No, it doesn't work. The problem seems to be in the PAGE_MASK definition
> (from include/asm-x86/page.h for example):
>
> /* PAGE_SHIFT determines the page size */
> #define PAGE_SHIFT 12
> #define PAGE_SIZE (_AC(1,UL) << PAGE_SHIFT)
> #define PAGE_MASK (~(PAGE_SIZE-1))
>
> The "~" is performed on a 32-bit value, so everything in "and" with
> PAGE_MASK greater than 4GB will be truncated to the 32-bit boundary.
OK, I oversimplified my testcase.
> What do you think about the following?
>
> #define PAGE_SIZE64 (1ULL << PAGE_SHIFT)
> #define PAGE_MASK64 (~(PAGE_SIZE64 - 1))
>
> #define PAGE_ALIGN(addr) ({ \
> typeof(addr) __size = PAGE_SIZE; \
> typeof(addr) __ret = (addr) + __size - 1; \
> __ret > -1UL ? __ret & PAGE_MASK64 : __ret & PAGE_MASK; \
> })
Complex. And I'd worry about added code overhead.
What about
#define PAGE_ALIGN(addr) ALIGN(addr, PAGE_SIZE)
?
afaict ALIGN() tries to do the right thing, and if it doesn't, we
should fix ALIGN().
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-06-11 22:55 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 32+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-05-21 15:29 [-mm][PATCH 0/4] Add memrlimit controller (v5) Balbir Singh
2008-05-21 15:29 ` [-mm][PATCH 1/4] Add memrlimit controller documentation (v5) Balbir Singh
2008-05-22 4:16 ` Andrew Morton
2008-05-22 10:13 ` Balbir Singh
2008-05-21 15:29 ` [-mm][PATCH 2/4] Setup the memrlimit controller (v5) Balbir Singh
2008-05-22 4:18 ` Andrew Morton
2008-05-22 10:14 ` Balbir Singh
2008-06-11 17:10 ` Andrea Righi
2008-06-11 17:33 ` Balbir Singh
2008-06-11 18:48 ` Andrea Righi
2008-06-11 19:15 ` Andrew Morton
2008-06-11 20:17 ` Andrea Righi
2008-06-11 20:43 ` Andrew Morton
2008-06-11 22:47 ` Andrea Righi
2008-06-11 22:55 ` Andrew Morton [this message]
2008-06-11 23:04 ` Andrea Righi
2008-06-12 6:13 ` Balbir Singh
2008-06-12 8:52 ` Andrea Righi
2008-06-12 9:02 ` Andrew Morton
2008-06-12 9:12 ` Andrea Righi
2008-06-12 17:02 ` [PATCH -mm] PAGE_ALIGN(): correctly handle 64-bit values on 32-bit architectures Andrea Righi
2008-06-12 22:14 ` Andrea Righi
2008-06-13 9:37 ` Balbir Singh
2008-06-13 9:45 ` Li Zefan
2008-05-21 15:29 ` [-mm][PATCH 3/4] cgroup mm owner callback changes to add task info (v5) Balbir Singh
2008-05-22 4:19 ` Andrew Morton
2008-05-22 10:14 ` Balbir Singh
2008-05-21 15:30 ` [-mm][PATCH 4/4] Add memrlimit controller accounting and control (v5) Balbir Singh
2008-05-21 17:20 ` Vivek Goyal
2008-05-22 4:41 ` Balbir Singh
2008-05-22 4:24 ` Andrew Morton
2008-05-22 10:15 ` Balbir Singh
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20080611155530.099a54d6.akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--to=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=balbir@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=lizf@cn.fujitsu.com \
--cc=menage@google.com \
--cc=righi.andrea@gmail.com \
--cc=skumar@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=xemul@openvz.org \
--cc=yamamoto@valinux.co.jp \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).