From: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
To: righi.andrea@gmail.com
Cc: balbir@linux.vnet.ibm.com, linux-mm@kvack.org,
skumar@linux.vnet.ibm.com, yamamoto@valinux.co.jp,
menage@google.com, lizf@cn.fujitsu.com,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, xemul@openvz.org,
kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com
Subject: Re: [-mm][PATCH 2/4] Setup the memrlimit controller (v5)
Date: Thu, 12 Jun 2008 02:02:35 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20080612020235.29a81d7c.akpm@linux-foundation.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4850E3BC.308@gmail.com>
On Thu, 12 Jun 2008 10:52:13 +0200 (MEST) Andrea Righi <righi.andrea@gmail.com> wrote:
> Balbir Singh wrote:
> > Andrew Morton wrote:
> >> #define PAGE_ALIGN(addr) ALIGN(addr, PAGE_SIZE)
> >>
> >> ?
> >>
> >> afaict ALIGN() tries to do the right thing, and if it doesn't, we
> >> should fix ALIGN().
> >>
> >
> > That should do the right thing, provided there are no duplicate ALIGN defintions
> > elsewhere
> >
> > kernel.h has
> >
> >
> > #define ALIGN(x,a) __ALIGN_MASK(x,(typeof(x))(a)-1)
> > #define __ALIGN_MASK(x,mask) (((x)+(mask))&~(mask))
> >
> > Which seems like the correct thing, since we use typeof(x) for (a) - 1.
>
> OK, I'm going to do some builds and tests on my i386 and x86_64 boxes
> with the following patch. I'm sure this will break something and I don't
> know if moving PAGE_ALIGN() out of asm-*/page.h is the right way.
Thanks. Looks good from here.
>
> ...
>
> --- a/include/linux/mm.h
> +++ b/include/linux/mm.h
> @@ -9,6 +9,7 @@
> #include <linux/list.h>
> #include <linux/mmzone.h>
> #include <linux/rbtree.h>
> +#include <linux/kernel.h>
> #include <linux/prio_tree.h>
> #include <linux/debug_locks.h>
> #include <linux/mm_types.h>
> @@ -41,6 +42,9 @@ extern unsigned long mmap_min_addr;
>
> #define nth_page(page,n) pfn_to_page(page_to_pfn((page)) + (n))
>
> +/* to align the pointer to the (next) page boundary */
> +#define PAGE_ALIGN(addr) ALIGN(addr, PAGE_SIZE)
> +
> /*
> * Linux kernel virtual memory manager primitives.
> * The idea being to have a "virtual" mm in the same way
You don't really need the #include <linux/kernel.h> there. As long as
all callsites which _use_ PAGE_ALIGN are including kernel.h via some
means (and they surely will be) then things will work OK.
But it won't hurt. We're already picking up kernel.h there via
mmzone.h->spinlock.h and probably 100 other routes. One more won't
make a lot of difference ;)
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-06-12 9:02 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 32+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-05-21 15:29 [-mm][PATCH 0/4] Add memrlimit controller (v5) Balbir Singh
2008-05-21 15:29 ` [-mm][PATCH 1/4] Add memrlimit controller documentation (v5) Balbir Singh
2008-05-22 4:16 ` Andrew Morton
2008-05-22 10:13 ` Balbir Singh
2008-05-21 15:29 ` [-mm][PATCH 2/4] Setup the memrlimit controller (v5) Balbir Singh
2008-05-22 4:18 ` Andrew Morton
2008-05-22 10:14 ` Balbir Singh
2008-06-11 17:10 ` Andrea Righi
2008-06-11 17:33 ` Balbir Singh
2008-06-11 18:48 ` Andrea Righi
2008-06-11 19:15 ` Andrew Morton
2008-06-11 20:17 ` Andrea Righi
2008-06-11 20:43 ` Andrew Morton
2008-06-11 22:47 ` Andrea Righi
2008-06-11 22:55 ` Andrew Morton
2008-06-11 23:04 ` Andrea Righi
2008-06-12 6:13 ` Balbir Singh
2008-06-12 8:52 ` Andrea Righi
2008-06-12 9:02 ` Andrew Morton [this message]
2008-06-12 9:12 ` Andrea Righi
2008-06-12 17:02 ` [PATCH -mm] PAGE_ALIGN(): correctly handle 64-bit values on 32-bit architectures Andrea Righi
2008-06-12 22:14 ` Andrea Righi
2008-06-13 9:37 ` Balbir Singh
2008-06-13 9:45 ` Li Zefan
2008-05-21 15:29 ` [-mm][PATCH 3/4] cgroup mm owner callback changes to add task info (v5) Balbir Singh
2008-05-22 4:19 ` Andrew Morton
2008-05-22 10:14 ` Balbir Singh
2008-05-21 15:30 ` [-mm][PATCH 4/4] Add memrlimit controller accounting and control (v5) Balbir Singh
2008-05-21 17:20 ` Vivek Goyal
2008-05-22 4:41 ` Balbir Singh
2008-05-22 4:24 ` Andrew Morton
2008-05-22 10:15 ` Balbir Singh
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20080612020235.29a81d7c.akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--to=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=balbir@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=lizf@cn.fujitsu.com \
--cc=menage@google.com \
--cc=righi.andrea@gmail.com \
--cc=skumar@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=xemul@openvz.org \
--cc=yamamoto@valinux.co.jp \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).