From: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
Nick Piggin <npiggin@suse.de>, Peter Klotz <peter.klotz@aon.at>,
stable@kernel.org,
Linux Memory Management List <linux-mm@kvack.org>,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>,
Roman Kononov <kernel@kononov.ftml.net>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, xfs@oss.sgi.com,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [patch] mm: fix lockless pagecache reordering bug (was Re:
Date: Mon, 5 Jan 2009 13:58:32 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20090105215832.GR6959@linux.vnet.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1231189491.11687.22.camel@twins>
On Mon, Jan 05, 2009 at 10:04:51PM +0100, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Mon, 2009-01-05 at 12:12 -0800, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> > On Mon, Jan 05, 2009 at 10:44:27AM -0800, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> > > On Mon, 5 Jan 2009, Nick Piggin wrote:
> > > > On Mon, Jan 05, 2009 at 09:30:55AM -0800, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> > > > Putting an rcu_dereference there might work, but I think it misses a
> > > > subtlety of this code.
> > >
> > > No, _you_ miss the subtlety of something that can change under you.
> > >
> > > Look at radix_tree_deref_slot(), and realize that without the
> > > rcu_dereference(), the compiler would actually be allowed to think that it
> > > can re-load anything from *pslot several times. So without my one-liner
> > > patch, the compiler can actually do this:
> > >
> > > register = load_from_memory(pslot)
> > > if (radix_tree_is_indirect_ptr(register))
> > > goto fail:
> > > return load_from_memory(pslot);
> > >
> > > fail:
> > > return RADIX_TREE_RETRY;
> >
> > My guess is that Nick believes that the value in *pslot cannot change
> > in such as way as to cause radix_tree_is_indirect_ptr()'s return value
> > to change within a given RCU grace period, and that Linus disagrees.
>
> Nick's belief would indeed be true IFF all modifying ops including all
> uses of radix_tree_replace_slot() are serialized wrt. each other.
>
> However, since radix_tree_deref_slot() is the counterpart of
> radix_tree_replace_slot(), one would indeed expect rcu_dereference()
> therein, much like Linus suggests.
>
> While what Nick says is true, the lifetime management of the data
> objects is arranged externally from the radix tree -- I still think we
> need the rcu_dereference() even for that argument, as we want to support
> RCU lifetime management as well.
Makes sense to me!
Thanx, Paul
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>
prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-01-05 21:58 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <gifgp1$8ic$1@ger.gmane.org>
[not found] ` <20081223171259.GA11945@infradead.org>
[not found] ` <20081230042333.GC27679@wotan.suse.de>
[not found] ` <20090103214443.GA6612@infradead.org>
[not found] ` <20090105014821.GA367@wotan.suse.de>
[not found] ` <20090105041959.GC367@wotan.suse.de>
[not found] ` <20090105064838.GA5209@wotan.suse.de>
[not found] ` <49623384.2070801@aon.at>
2009-01-05 16:41 ` [patch] mm: fix lockless pagecache reordering bug (was Re: BUG: soft lockup - is this XFS problem?) Nick Piggin
2009-01-05 17:30 ` Linus Torvalds
2009-01-05 18:00 ` Nick Piggin
2009-01-05 18:44 ` Linus Torvalds
2009-01-05 19:39 ` Linus Torvalds
2009-01-06 17:17 ` Paul E. McKenney
2009-01-05 20:12 ` Paul E. McKenney
2009-01-05 20:39 ` Linus Torvalds
2009-01-05 21:57 ` Paul E. McKenney
2009-01-06 2:05 ` Nick Piggin
2009-01-06 2:23 ` Paul E. McKenney
2009-01-06 2:29 ` Linus Torvalds
2009-01-06 8:38 ` Peter Klotz
2009-01-06 8:43 ` Nick Piggin
2009-01-06 16:16 ` Roman Kononov
2009-01-05 21:04 ` [patch] mm: fix lockless pagecache reordering bug (was Peter Zijlstra
2009-01-05 21:58 ` Paul E. McKenney [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20090105215832.GR6959@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--to=paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=hch@infradead.org \
--cc=kernel@kononov.ftml.net \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=npiggin@suse.de \
--cc=peter.klotz@aon.at \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=stable@kernel.org \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=xfs@oss.sgi.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).