[PATCH] Remove needless lock and list in vmap

[PATCH] Remove needless lock and list in vmap

[MinChan Kim]

Anyone don't use vmap's dirty_list.
I am not sure this is thing Nick's future work on purpose.
If it is a dummy, we can remove dirty list and related codes
to handle list and locking.

Also, In free_vmap_block, we don't have to check empty free_list.
That's becuase before calling free_vmap_block, vb_free always checks
empty of vb->free_list.

Now except vb_free, Anywhere don't call free_vmap_block.
so, we can remove that check and locking.

If it is nick's intention to work in future, please, ignore this patch. 

Signed-off-by: MinChan Kim <minchan.kim@gmail.com>
---
 mm/vmalloc.c |   19 ++-----------------
 1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 17 deletions(-)

diff --git a/mm/vmalloc.c b/mm/vmalloc.c
index 1ddb77b..1f79883 100644
--- a/mm/vmalloc.c
+++ b/mm/vmalloc.c
@@ -629,10 +629,7 @@ struct vmap_block {
 	DECLARE_BITMAP(alloc_map, VMAP_BBMAP_BITS);
 	DECLARE_BITMAP(dirty_map, VMAP_BBMAP_BITS);
 	union {
-		struct {
-			struct list_head free_list;
-			struct list_head dirty_list;
-		};
+		struct list_head free_list;
 		struct rcu_head rcu_head;
 	};
 };
@@ -699,7 +696,6 @@ static struct vmap_block *new_vmap_block(gfp_t gfp_mask)
 	bitmap_zero(vb->alloc_map, VMAP_BBMAP_BITS);
 	bitmap_zero(vb->dirty_map, VMAP_BBMAP_BITS);
 	INIT_LIST_HEAD(&vb->free_list);
-	INIT_LIST_HEAD(&vb->dirty_list);
 
 	vb_idx = addr_to_vb_idx(va->va_start);
 	spin_lock(&vmap_block_tree_lock);
@@ -730,13 +726,6 @@ static void free_vmap_block(struct vmap_block *vb)
 	struct vmap_block *tmp;
 	unsigned long vb_idx;
 
-	spin_lock(&vb->vbq->lock);
-	if (!list_empty(&vb->free_list))
-		list_del(&vb->free_list);
-	if (!list_empty(&vb->dirty_list))
-		list_del(&vb->dirty_list);
-	spin_unlock(&vb->vbq->lock);
-
 	vb_idx = addr_to_vb_idx(vb->va->va_start);
 	spin_lock(&vmap_block_tree_lock);
 	tmp = radix_tree_delete(&vmap_block_tree, vb_idx);
@@ -820,11 +809,7 @@ static void vb_free(const void *addr, unsigned long size)
 
 	spin_lock(&vb->lock);
 	bitmap_allocate_region(vb->dirty_map, offset >> PAGE_SHIFT, order);
-	if (!vb->dirty) {
-		spin_lock(&vb->vbq->lock);
-		list_add(&vb->dirty_list, &vb->vbq->dirty);
-		spin_unlock(&vb->vbq->lock);
-	}
+
 	vb->dirty += 1UL << order;
 	if (vb->dirty == VMAP_BBMAP_BITS) {
 		BUG_ON(vb->free || !list_empty(&vb->free_list));
-- 
1.5.4.3

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>

Re: [PATCH] Remove needless lock and list in vmap

[Nick Piggin]

On Wed, Jan 07, 2009 at 02:47:13PM +0900, MinChan Kim wrote:
> Anyone don't use vmap's dirty_list.
> I am not sure this is thing Nick's future work on purpose.
> If it is a dummy, we can remove dirty list and related codes
> to handle list and locking.
> 
> Also, In free_vmap_block, we don't have to check empty free_list.
> That's becuase before calling free_vmap_block, vb_free always checks
> empty of vb->free_list.
> 
> Now except vb_free, Anywhere don't call free_vmap_block.
> so, we can remove that check and locking.
> 
> If it is nick's intention to work in future, please, ignore this patch. 

It was going to be an attempt to optimise flushing a bit, but I never
finished writing the code. Either way, it doesn't belong upstream until
time as it is needed, so your patch is good.

Can you just put a BUG_ON(!list_empty(&vb->free_list)); in free_vmap_block?
Then add Acked-by: Nick Piggin <npiggin@suse.de>

Thanks,
Nick

> 
> Signed-off-by: MinChan Kim <minchan.kim@gmail.com>
> ---
>  mm/vmalloc.c |   19 ++-----------------
>  1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 17 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/mm/vmalloc.c b/mm/vmalloc.c
> index 1ddb77b..1f79883 100644
> --- a/mm/vmalloc.c
> +++ b/mm/vmalloc.c
> @@ -629,10 +629,7 @@ struct vmap_block {
>  	DECLARE_BITMAP(alloc_map, VMAP_BBMAP_BITS);
>  	DECLARE_BITMAP(dirty_map, VMAP_BBMAP_BITS);
>  	union {
> -		struct {
> -			struct list_head free_list;
> -			struct list_head dirty_list;
> -		};
> +		struct list_head free_list;
>  		struct rcu_head rcu_head;
>  	};
>  };
> @@ -699,7 +696,6 @@ static struct vmap_block *new_vmap_block(gfp_t gfp_mask)
>  	bitmap_zero(vb->alloc_map, VMAP_BBMAP_BITS);
>  	bitmap_zero(vb->dirty_map, VMAP_BBMAP_BITS);
>  	INIT_LIST_HEAD(&vb->free_list);
> -	INIT_LIST_HEAD(&vb->dirty_list);
>  
>  	vb_idx = addr_to_vb_idx(va->va_start);
>  	spin_lock(&vmap_block_tree_lock);
> @@ -730,13 +726,6 @@ static void free_vmap_block(struct vmap_block *vb)
>  	struct vmap_block *tmp;
>  	unsigned long vb_idx;
>  
> -	spin_lock(&vb->vbq->lock);
> -	if (!list_empty(&vb->free_list))
> -		list_del(&vb->free_list);
> -	if (!list_empty(&vb->dirty_list))
> -		list_del(&vb->dirty_list);
> -	spin_unlock(&vb->vbq->lock);
> -
>  	vb_idx = addr_to_vb_idx(vb->va->va_start);
>  	spin_lock(&vmap_block_tree_lock);
>  	tmp = radix_tree_delete(&vmap_block_tree, vb_idx);
> @@ -820,11 +809,7 @@ static void vb_free(const void *addr, unsigned long size)
>  
>  	spin_lock(&vb->lock);
>  	bitmap_allocate_region(vb->dirty_map, offset >> PAGE_SHIFT, order);
> -	if (!vb->dirty) {
> -		spin_lock(&vb->vbq->lock);
> -		list_add(&vb->dirty_list, &vb->vbq->dirty);
> -		spin_unlock(&vb->vbq->lock);
> -	}
> +
>  	vb->dirty += 1UL << order;
>  	if (vb->dirty == VMAP_BBMAP_BITS) {
>  		BUG_ON(vb->free || !list_empty(&vb->free_list));
> -- 
> 1.5.4.3

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>

Re: [PATCH] Remove needless lock and list in vmap

[MinChan Kim]

* Nick Piggin (npiggin@suse.de) wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 07, 2009 at 02:47:13PM +0900, MinChan Kim wrote:
> > Anyone don't use vmap's dirty_list.
> > I am not sure this is thing Nick's future work on purpose.
> > If it is a dummy, we can remove dirty list and related codes
> > to handle list and locking.
> > 
> > Also, In free_vmap_block, we don't have to check empty free_list.
> > That's becuase before calling free_vmap_block, vb_free always checks
> > empty of vb->free_list.
> > 
> > Now except vb_free, Anywhere don't call free_vmap_block.
> > so, we can remove that check and locking.
> > 
> > If it is nick's intention to work in future, please, ignore this patch. 
> 
> It was going to be an attempt to optimise flushing a bit, but I never
> finished writing the code. Either way, it doesn't belong upstream until
> time as it is needed, so your patch is good.

Thanks for your kind words. 
 
> Can you just put a BUG_ON(!list_empty(&vb->free_list)); in free_vmap_block?
> Then add Acked-by: Nick Piggin <npiggin@suse.de>

I added BUG_ON.

> Thanks,
> Nick
> 

This is improvement patch. 

===


Subject: [PATCH] Remove needless lock and list in vmap

Now, Anyone don't use vmap's dirty_list.
It's for optimizing flushing. but Nick didn't write the code yet.
so, we don't need it until time as it is needed.

This patch removes vmap_block's dirty_list and codes related to it.

Signed-off-by: MinChan Kim <minchan.kim@gmail.com>
Acked-by: Nick Piggin <npiggin@suse.de>
---
 mm/vmalloc.c |   19 +++----------------
 1 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 16 deletions(-)

diff --git a/mm/vmalloc.c b/mm/vmalloc.c
index 1ddb77b..a7e1c2e 100644
--- a/mm/vmalloc.c
+++ b/mm/vmalloc.c
@@ -629,10 +629,7 @@ struct vmap_block {
 	DECLARE_BITMAP(alloc_map, VMAP_BBMAP_BITS);
 	DECLARE_BITMAP(dirty_map, VMAP_BBMAP_BITS);
 	union {
-		struct {
-			struct list_head free_list;
-			struct list_head dirty_list;
-		};
+		struct list_head free_list;
 		struct rcu_head rcu_head;
 	};
 };
@@ -699,7 +696,6 @@ static struct vmap_block *new_vmap_block(gfp_t gfp_mask)
 	bitmap_zero(vb->alloc_map, VMAP_BBMAP_BITS);
 	bitmap_zero(vb->dirty_map, VMAP_BBMAP_BITS);
 	INIT_LIST_HEAD(&vb->free_list);
-	INIT_LIST_HEAD(&vb->dirty_list);
 
 	vb_idx = addr_to_vb_idx(va->va_start);
 	spin_lock(&vmap_block_tree_lock);
@@ -730,12 +726,7 @@ static void free_vmap_block(struct vmap_block *vb)
 	struct vmap_block *tmp;
 	unsigned long vb_idx;
 
-	spin_lock(&vb->vbq->lock);
-	if (!list_empty(&vb->free_list))
-		list_del(&vb->free_list);
-	if (!list_empty(&vb->dirty_list))
-		list_del(&vb->dirty_list);
-	spin_unlock(&vb->vbq->lock);
+	BUG_ON(!list_empty(&vb->free_list));
 
 	vb_idx = addr_to_vb_idx(vb->va->va_start);
 	spin_lock(&vmap_block_tree_lock);
@@ -820,11 +811,7 @@ static void vb_free(const void *addr, unsigned long size)
 
 	spin_lock(&vb->lock);
 	bitmap_allocate_region(vb->dirty_map, offset >> PAGE_SHIFT, order);
-	if (!vb->dirty) {
-		spin_lock(&vb->vbq->lock);
-		list_add(&vb->dirty_list, &vb->vbq->dirty);
-		spin_unlock(&vb->vbq->lock);
-	}
+
 	vb->dirty += 1UL << order;
 	if (vb->dirty == VMAP_BBMAP_BITS) {
 		BUG_ON(vb->free || !list_empty(&vb->free_list));
-- 
1.5.4.3

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>

Re: [PATCH] Remove needless lock and list in vmap

[Nick Piggin]

On Wed, Jan 07, 2009 at 02:47:13PM +0900, MinChan Kim wrote:
> Anyone don't use vmap's dirty_list.
> I am not sure this is thing Nick's future work on purpose.
> If it is a dummy, we can remove dirty list and related codes
> to handle list and locking.
> 
> Also, In free_vmap_block, we don't have to check empty free_list.
> That's becuase before calling free_vmap_block, vb_free always checks
> empty of vb->free_list.
> 
> Now except vb_free, Anywhere don't call free_vmap_block.
> so, we can remove that check and locking.
> 
> If it is nick's intention to work in future, please, ignore this patch. 

I should add, it isn't really required for -stable.

> 
> Signed-off-by: MinChan Kim <minchan.kim@gmail.com>
> ---
>  mm/vmalloc.c |   19 ++-----------------
>  1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 17 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/mm/vmalloc.c b/mm/vmalloc.c
> index 1ddb77b..1f79883 100644
> --- a/mm/vmalloc.c
> +++ b/mm/vmalloc.c
> @@ -629,10 +629,7 @@ struct vmap_block {
>  	DECLARE_BITMAP(alloc_map, VMAP_BBMAP_BITS);
>  	DECLARE_BITMAP(dirty_map, VMAP_BBMAP_BITS);
>  	union {
> -		struct {
> -			struct list_head free_list;
> -			struct list_head dirty_list;
> -		};
> +		struct list_head free_list;
>  		struct rcu_head rcu_head;
>  	};
>  };
> @@ -699,7 +696,6 @@ static struct vmap_block *new_vmap_block(gfp_t gfp_mask)
>  	bitmap_zero(vb->alloc_map, VMAP_BBMAP_BITS);
>  	bitmap_zero(vb->dirty_map, VMAP_BBMAP_BITS);
>  	INIT_LIST_HEAD(&vb->free_list);
> -	INIT_LIST_HEAD(&vb->dirty_list);
>  
>  	vb_idx = addr_to_vb_idx(va->va_start);
>  	spin_lock(&vmap_block_tree_lock);
> @@ -730,13 +726,6 @@ static void free_vmap_block(struct vmap_block *vb)
>  	struct vmap_block *tmp;
>  	unsigned long vb_idx;
>  
> -	spin_lock(&vb->vbq->lock);
> -	if (!list_empty(&vb->free_list))
> -		list_del(&vb->free_list);
> -	if (!list_empty(&vb->dirty_list))
> -		list_del(&vb->dirty_list);
> -	spin_unlock(&vb->vbq->lock);
> -
>  	vb_idx = addr_to_vb_idx(vb->va->va_start);
>  	spin_lock(&vmap_block_tree_lock);
>  	tmp = radix_tree_delete(&vmap_block_tree, vb_idx);
> @@ -820,11 +809,7 @@ static void vb_free(const void *addr, unsigned long size)
>  
>  	spin_lock(&vb->lock);
>  	bitmap_allocate_region(vb->dirty_map, offset >> PAGE_SHIFT, order);
> -	if (!vb->dirty) {
> -		spin_lock(&vb->vbq->lock);
> -		list_add(&vb->dirty_list, &vb->vbq->dirty);
> -		spin_unlock(&vb->vbq->lock);
> -	}
> +
>  	vb->dirty += 1UL << order;
>  	if (vb->dirty == VMAP_BBMAP_BITS) {
>  		BUG_ON(vb->free || !list_empty(&vb->free_list));
> -- 
> 1.5.4.3

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>