From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail137.messagelabs.com (mail137.messagelabs.com [216.82.249.19]) by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1C1A26B006A for ; Thu, 15 Jan 2009 05:51:24 -0500 (EST) Received: from d28relay04.in.ibm.com (d28relay04.in.ibm.com [9.184.220.61]) by e28smtp04.in.ibm.com (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id n0FApH4g015897 for ; Thu, 15 Jan 2009 16:21:17 +0530 Received: from d28av02.in.ibm.com (d28av02.in.ibm.com [9.184.220.64]) by d28relay04.in.ibm.com (8.13.8/8.13.8/NCO v9.1) with ESMTP id n0FApLVG2396200 for ; Thu, 15 Jan 2009 16:21:21 +0530 Received: from d28av02.in.ibm.com (loopback [127.0.0.1]) by d28av02.in.ibm.com (8.13.1/8.13.3) with ESMTP id n0FApGfX023680 for ; Thu, 15 Jan 2009 21:51:17 +1100 Date: Thu, 15 Jan 2009 16:21:16 +0530 From: Balbir Singh Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/4] cgroup/memcg : updates related to CSS Message-ID: <20090115105116.GG30358@balbir.in.ibm.com> Reply-To: balbir@linux.vnet.ibm.com References: <20090115192120.9956911b.kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20090115192120.9956911b.kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com> Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org To: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki Cc: "linux-mm@kvack.org" , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , "menage@google.com" , "lizf@cn.fujitsu.com" , "nishimura@mxp.nes.nec.co.jp" , "akpm@linux-foundation.org" List-ID: * KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki [2009-01-15 19:21:20]: > > I'm sorry that I couldn't work so much, this week. > No much updates but I think all comments I got are applied. > > About memcg part, I'll wait for that all Nishimura's fixes go ahead. > If cgroup part looks good, please Ack. I added CC to Andrew Morton for that part. > > changes from previous series > - dropeed a fix to OOM KILL (will reschedule) > - dropped a fix to -EBUSY (will reschedule) > - added css_is_populated() > - added hierarchy_stat patch > > Known my homework is > - resize_limit should return -EBUSY. (Li Zefan reported.) > > Andrew, I'll CC: you [1/4] and [2/4]. But no explicit Acked-by yet to any patches. > Kamezawa-San, like you've suggested earlier, I think it is important to split up the fixes from the development patches. I wonder if we should start marking all patches with BUGFIX for bug fixes, so that we can prioritize those first. -- Balbir -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: email@kvack.org