linux-mm.kvack.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Nick Piggin <npiggin@suse.de>
To: Christoph Lameter <cl@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
	Linux Memory Management List <linux-mm@kvack.org>
Subject: Re: [patch] mm: fix assertion
Date: Fri, 16 Jan 2009 03:57:08 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20090116025708.GJ17810@wotan.suse.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.64.0901151132320.22151@quilx.com>

On Thu, Jan 15, 2009 at 11:35:45AM -0600, Christoph Lameter wrote:
> You still have a
> 
>   VM_BUG_ON(PageTail(page));
> 
> in page_cache_get_speculative() which will verify that the
> successfully acquired speculative reference is not a compound tail.

Good point.
 
> Reviewed-by: Christoph Lameter <cl@linux-foundation.org>

Thanks

> 
> On Wed, 14 Jan 2009, Nick Piggin wrote:
> 
> > (I ran into this when debugging the lockless pagecache barrier problem btw)
> >
> > --
> >
> > This assertion is incorrect for lockless pagecache. By definition if we have an
> > unpinned page that we are trying to take a speculative reference to, it may
> > become the tail of a compound page at any time (if it is freed, then reallocated
> > as a compound page).
> >
> > It was still a valid assertion for the vmscan.c LRU isolation case, but it
> > doesn't seem incredibly helpful... if somebody wants it, they can put it back
> > directly where it applies in the vmscan code.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Nick Piggin <npiggin@suse.de>
> > ---
> > Index: linux-2.6/include/linux/mm.h
> > ===================================================================
> > --- linux-2.6.orig/include/linux/mm.h	2009-01-05 14:53:29.000000000 +1100
> > +++ linux-2.6/include/linux/mm.h	2009-01-05 14:53:54.000000000 +1100
> > @@ -270,7 +270,6 @@ static inline int put_page_testzero(stru
> >   */
> >  static inline int get_page_unless_zero(struct page *page)
> >  {
> > -	VM_BUG_ON(PageTail(page));
> >  	return atomic_inc_not_zero(&page->_count);
> >  }
> >
> >
> > --
> > To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
> > the body to majordomo@kvack.org.  For more info on Linux MM,
> > see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
> > Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>
> >

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>

      reply	other threads:[~2009-01-16  2:57 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2009-01-14  6:28 [patch] mm: fix assertion Nick Piggin
2009-01-15 17:35 ` Christoph Lameter
2009-01-16  2:57   ` Nick Piggin [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20090116025708.GJ17810@wotan.suse.de \
    --to=npiggin@suse.de \
    --cc=cl@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).