linux-mm.kvack.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>
To: Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>
Cc: Chris Mason <chris.mason@oracle.com>,
	Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>,
	Matthew Wilcox <matthew@wil.cx>, Chuck Lever <cel@citi.umich.edu>,
	Nick Piggin <nickpiggin@yahoo.com.au>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
Subject: Re: [RFC v4] wait: prevent waiter starvation in __wait_on_bit_lock
Date: Fri, 23 Jan 2009 14:30:50 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20090123133050.GA19226@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20090123113541.GB12684@redhat.com>

On 01/23, Oleg Nesterov wrote:
>
> It is no that I think this new helper is really needed for this
> particular case, personally I agree with the patch you sent.
>
> But if we have other places with the similar problem, then perhaps
> it is better to introduce the special finish_wait_exclusive() or
> whatever.

To clarify, I suggest something like this.

	int finish_wait_exclusive(wait_queue_head_t *q, wait_queue_t *wait,
					int ret, int state, void *key)
	{
		unsigned long flags;

		__set_current_state(TASK_RUNNING);

		if (ret || !list_empty_careful(&wait->task_list)) {
			spin_lock_irqsave(&q->lock, flags);
			if (list_empty(&wait->task_list))
				 __wake_up_common(q, state, 1, key);
			else
				list_del_init(&wait->task_list);
			spin_unlock_irqrestore(&q->lock, flags);
		}

		return ret;
	}

Now, __wait_on_bit_lock() becomes:

	int __sched
	__wait_on_bit_lock(wait_queue_head_t *wq, struct wait_bit_queue *q,
				int (*action)(void *), unsigned mode)
	{
		int ret = 0;

		do {
			prepare_to_wait_exclusive(wq, &q->wait, mode);
			if (test_bit(q->key.bit_nr, q->key.flags) &&
			   (ret = (*action)(q->key.flags))
				break;
		} while (test_and_set_bit(q->key.bit_nr, q->key.flags));

		return finish_wait_exclusive(wq, &q->wait, ret, mode, &q->key);
	}

And __wait_event_interruptible_exclusive:

	#define __wait_event_interruptible_exclusive(wq, condition, ret)	\
	do {									\
		DEFINE_WAIT(__wait);						\
										\
		for (;;) {							\
			prepare_to_wait_exclusive(&wq, &__wait,			\
						TASK_INTERRUPTIBLE);		\
			if (condition)						\
				break;						\
			if (!signal_pending(current)) {				\
				schedule();					\
				continue;					\
			}							\
			ret = -ERESTARTSYS;					\
			break;							\
		}								\
		finish_wait_exclusive(&wq, &__wait,				\
					ret, TASK_INTERRUPTIBLE, NULL);		\
	} while (0)

But I can't convince myself this is what we really want. So I am not
sending the patch. And yes, we have to check ret twice.

Oleg.

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>

  reply	other threads:[~2009-01-23 13:33 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 27+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <20090117215110.GA3300@redhat.com>
2009-01-18  1:38 ` [PATCH v3] wait: prevent waiter starvation in __wait_on_bit_lock Johannes Weiner
2009-01-18  2:32   ` Oleg Nesterov
2009-01-20 20:31     ` Johannes Weiner
2009-01-21 14:36       ` Oleg Nesterov
2009-01-21 21:38         ` [RFC v4] " Johannes Weiner
2009-01-22 20:25           ` Oleg Nesterov
2009-01-23  0:26             ` Dmitry Adamushko
2009-01-23  0:47               ` Oleg Nesterov
2009-01-23 10:07                 ` Dmitry Adamushko
2009-01-23 11:05                   ` Oleg Nesterov
2009-01-23 12:36                     ` Dmitry Adamushko
2009-01-23  9:59             ` Johannes Weiner
2009-01-23 11:35               ` Oleg Nesterov
2009-01-23 13:30                 ` Oleg Nesterov [this message]
2009-01-26 21:59                   ` [RFC v5] wait: prevent exclusive waiter starvation Johannes Weiner
2009-01-27  3:23                     ` Oleg Nesterov
2009-01-27 19:34                       ` [RFC v6] " Johannes Weiner
2009-01-27 20:05                         ` Oleg Nesterov
2009-01-27 22:31                           ` Johannes Weiner
2009-01-28  9:14                           ` [RFC v7] " Johannes Weiner
2009-01-29  4:42                             ` Oleg Nesterov
2009-01-29  7:37                               ` Andrew Morton
2009-01-29  8:31                                 ` Oleg Nesterov
2009-01-29  9:11                                   ` Andrew Morton
2009-01-29 14:34                                     ` Chris Mason
2009-02-02 15:47                                       ` Chris Mason
2009-01-23 19:24                 ` [RFC v4] wait: prevent waiter starvation in __wait_on_bit_lock Johannes Weiner

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20090123133050.GA19226@redhat.com \
    --to=oleg@redhat.com \
    --cc=a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=cel@citi.umich.edu \
    --cc=chris.mason@oracle.com \
    --cc=hannes@cmpxchg.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=matthew@wil.cx \
    --cc=mingo@elte.hu \
    --cc=nickpiggin@yahoo.com.au \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).