From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail203.messagelabs.com (mail203.messagelabs.com [216.82.254.243]) by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B47F26B00B3 for ; Mon, 16 Feb 2009 13:42:05 -0500 (EST) Date: Mon, 16 Feb 2009 18:42:00 +0000 From: Mel Gorman Subject: Re: [patch] SLQB slab allocator (try 2) Message-ID: <20090216184200.GA31264@csn.ul.ie> References: <20090123154653.GA14517@wotan.suse.de> <200902041748.41801.nickpiggin@yahoo.com.au> <20090204152709.GA4799@csn.ul.ie> <200902051459.30064.nickpiggin@yahoo.com.au> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-15 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <200902051459.30064.nickpiggin@yahoo.com.au> Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org To: Nick Piggin Cc: Pekka Enberg , Nick Piggin , Linux Memory Management List , Linux Kernel Mailing List , Andrew Morton , Lin Ming , "Zhang, Yanmin" , Christoph Lameter List-ID: Slightly later than hoped for, but here are the results of the profile run between the different slab allocators. It also includes information on the performance on SLUB with the allocator pass-thru logic reverted by commit http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/penberg/slab-2.6.git;a=commitdiff;h=97a4871761e735b6f1acd3bc7c3bac30dae3eab9