From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail143.messagelabs.com (mail143.messagelabs.com [216.82.254.35]) by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0C59B6B00AF for ; Sun, 1 Mar 2009 15:58:53 -0500 (EST) Received: from d03relay04.boulder.ibm.com (d03relay04.boulder.ibm.com [9.17.195.106]) by e34.co.us.ibm.com (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id n21Kv3ka016612 for ; Sun, 1 Mar 2009 13:57:03 -0700 Received: from d03av01.boulder.ibm.com (d03av01.boulder.ibm.com [9.17.195.167]) by d03relay04.boulder.ibm.com (8.13.8/8.13.8/NCO v9.2) with ESMTP id n21Kwq6c190608 for ; Sun, 1 Mar 2009 13:58:52 -0700 Received: from d03av01.boulder.ibm.com (loopback [127.0.0.1]) by d03av01.boulder.ibm.com (8.12.11.20060308/8.13.3) with ESMTP id n21KwqDP001421 for ; Sun, 1 Mar 2009 13:58:52 -0700 Date: Sun, 1 Mar 2009 12:58:49 -0800 From: Gary Hade Subject: Re: [PATCH] mm: get_nid_for_pfn() returns int Message-ID: <20090301205849.GA11069@us.ibm.com> References: <20090119175919.GA7476@us.ibm.com> <20090126223350.610b0283.akpm@linux-foundation.org> <20090127210727.GA9592@us.ibm.com> <25e057c00902270656x1781d04er5703058e47df455f@mail.gmail.com> <20090227213340.GB7174@us.ibm.com> <20090227134616.982fb73a.akpm@linux-foundation.org> <20090228001400.GC7174@us.ibm.com> <20090227162249.bcd0813a.akpm@linux-foundation.org> <20090228030200.GA7342@us.ibm.com> <20090227200805.23d27aa1.akpm@linux-foundation.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20090227200805.23d27aa1.akpm@linux-foundation.org> Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org To: Andrew Morton Cc: Gary Hade , roel.kluin@gmail.com, mingo@elte.hu, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org, y-goto@jp.fujitsu.com List-ID: On Fri, Feb 27, 2009 at 08:08:05PM -0800, Andrew Morton wrote: > On Fri, 27 Feb 2009 19:02:00 -0800 Gary Hade wrote: > > > > > > Should it unlinger? I have it in the 2.6.30 pile. > > > > > > > > Yes, that would be good. :) > > > > > > What would be good? Your answer is ambiguous. > > > > Sorry, I was just trying to agree that your plan to wait > > until 2.6.30 works for me. Unless someone else objects > > leave it in your 2.6.30 pile. > > I object ;) > > The change is obviously correct, let's merge it now. Well, I wouldn't quibble with that. :) Thanks! > > This could cause presently-working systems to stop working due to > hitherto-undiscovered bugs. If so, sue me. Extremely unlikely IMO. Gary -- Gary Hade System x Enablement IBM Linux Technology Center 503-578-4503 IBM T/L: 775-4503 garyhade@us.ibm.com http://www.ibm.com/linux/ltc -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: email@kvack.org