From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail143.messagelabs.com (mail143.messagelabs.com [216.82.254.35]) by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 02C446B004D for ; Thu, 12 Mar 2009 13:56:59 -0400 (EDT) Date: Thu, 12 Mar 2009 17:55:57 +0000 From: Jamie Lokier Subject: Re: [uClinux-dev] Re: [PATCH] NOMMU: Pages allocated to a ramfs inode's pagecache may get wrongly discarded Message-ID: <20090312175557.GD14491@shareable.org> References: <20090311170207.1795cad9.akpm@linux-foundation.org> <28c262360903111735s2b0c43a3pd48fcf8d55416ae3@mail.gmail.com> <20090312100049.43A3.A69D9226@jp.fujitsu.com> <200903120819.08724.rgetz@blackfin.uclinux.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <200903120819.08724.rgetz@blackfin.uclinux.org> Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org To: uClinux development list Cc: KOSAKI Motohiro , Lee Schermerhorn , Rik van Riel , peterz@infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org, Minchan Kim , Johannes Weiner , Andrew Morton , torvalds@linux-foundation.org List-ID: Robin Getz wrote: > > Currently, CONFIG_UNEVICTABLE_LRU can't use on nommu machine > > because nobody of vmscan folk havbe nommu machine. > > > > Yes, it is very stupid reason. _very_ welcome to tester! :) > > As always - if you (or any kernel developer) would like a noMMU machine to > test on - please send me a private email. Well, that explains why vmscan has historically performed a little dubiously on small nommu machines! By the way, this is just a random side thought... nommu kernels work just fine in emulators :-) -- Jamie -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: email@kvack.org