From: Balbir Singh <balbir@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: linux-mm@kvack.org
Cc: YAMAMOTO Takashi <yamamoto@valinux.co.jp>,
lizf@cn.fujitsu.com,
KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com>,
Balbir Singh <balbir@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com>
Subject: [PATCH 4/5] Memory controller soft limit refactor reclaim flags (v7)
Date: Thu, 19 Mar 2009 22:27:44 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20090319165744.27274.6335.sendpatchset@localhost.localdomain> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20090319165713.27274.94129.sendpatchset@localhost.localdomain>
Impact: Refactor mem_cgroup_hierarchical_reclaim()
From: Balbir Singh <balbir@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
This patch refactors the arguments passed to
mem_cgroup_hierarchical_reclaim() into flags, so that new parameters don't
have to be passed as we make the reclaim routine more flexible
Signed-off-by: Balbir Singh <balbir@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
---
mm/memcontrol.c | 27 ++++++++++++++++++++-------
1 files changed, 20 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
diff --git a/mm/memcontrol.c b/mm/memcontrol.c
index f5b61b8..992aac8 100644
--- a/mm/memcontrol.c
+++ b/mm/memcontrol.c
@@ -227,6 +227,14 @@ pcg_default_flags[NR_CHARGE_TYPE] = {
#define MEMFILE_TYPE(val) (((val) >> 16) & 0xffff)
#define MEMFILE_ATTR(val) ((val) & 0xffff)
+/*
+ * Reclaim flags for mem_cgroup_hierarchical_reclaim
+ */
+#define MEM_CGROUP_RECLAIM_NOSWAP_BIT 0x0
+#define MEM_CGROUP_RECLAIM_NOSWAP (1 << MEM_CGROUP_RECLAIM_NOSWAP_BIT)
+#define MEM_CGROUP_RECLAIM_SHRINK_BIT 0x1
+#define MEM_CGROUP_RECLAIM_SHRINK (1 << MEM_CGROUP_RECLAIM_SHRINK_BIT)
+
static void mem_cgroup_get(struct mem_cgroup *mem);
static void mem_cgroup_put(struct mem_cgroup *mem);
static struct mem_cgroup *parent_mem_cgroup(struct mem_cgroup *mem);
@@ -889,11 +897,14 @@ mem_cgroup_select_victim(struct mem_cgroup *root_mem)
* If shrink==true, for avoiding to free too much, this returns immedieately.
*/
static int mem_cgroup_hierarchical_reclaim(struct mem_cgroup *root_mem,
- gfp_t gfp_mask, bool noswap, bool shrink)
+ gfp_t gfp_mask,
+ unsigned long reclaim_options)
{
struct mem_cgroup *victim;
int ret, total = 0;
int loop = 0;
+ bool noswap = reclaim_options & MEM_CGROUP_RECLAIM_NOSWAP;
+ bool shrink = reclaim_options & MEM_CGROUP_RECLAIM_SHRINK;
while (loop < 2) {
victim = mem_cgroup_select_victim(root_mem);
@@ -1029,7 +1040,7 @@ static int __mem_cgroup_try_charge(struct mm_struct *mm,
while (1) {
int ret;
- bool noswap = false;
+ unsigned long flags = 0;
ret = res_counter_charge(&mem->res, PAGE_SIZE, &fail_res,
&soft_fail_res);
@@ -1042,7 +1053,7 @@ static int __mem_cgroup_try_charge(struct mm_struct *mm,
break;
/* mem+swap counter fails */
res_counter_uncharge(&mem->res, PAGE_SIZE, NULL);
- noswap = true;
+ flags |= MEM_CGROUP_RECLAIM_NOSWAP;
mem_over_limit = mem_cgroup_from_res_counter(fail_res,
memsw);
} else
@@ -1054,7 +1065,7 @@ static int __mem_cgroup_try_charge(struct mm_struct *mm,
goto nomem;
ret = mem_cgroup_hierarchical_reclaim(mem_over_limit, gfp_mask,
- noswap, false);
+ flags);
if (ret)
continue;
@@ -1766,7 +1777,7 @@ int mem_cgroup_shrink_usage(struct page *page,
do {
progress = mem_cgroup_hierarchical_reclaim(mem,
- gfp_mask, true, false);
+ gfp_mask, MEM_CGROUP_RECLAIM_NOSWAP);
progress += mem_cgroup_check_under_limit(mem);
} while (!progress && --retry);
@@ -1821,7 +1832,7 @@ static int mem_cgroup_resize_limit(struct mem_cgroup *memcg,
break;
progress = mem_cgroup_hierarchical_reclaim(memcg, GFP_KERNEL,
- false, true);
+ MEM_CGROUP_RECLAIM_SHRINK);
curusage = res_counter_read_u64(&memcg->res, RES_USAGE);
/* Usage is reduced ? */
if (curusage >= oldusage)
@@ -1869,7 +1880,9 @@ int mem_cgroup_resize_memsw_limit(struct mem_cgroup *memcg,
if (!ret)
break;
- mem_cgroup_hierarchical_reclaim(memcg, GFP_KERNEL, true, true);
+ mem_cgroup_hierarchical_reclaim(memcg, GFP_KERNEL,
+ MEM_CGROUP_RECLAIM_NOSWAP |
+ MEM_CGROUP_RECLAIM_SHRINK);
curusage = res_counter_read_u64(&memcg->memsw, RES_USAGE);
/* Usage is reduced ? */
if (curusage >= oldusage)
--
Balbir
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-03-19 16:58 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 54+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-03-19 16:57 [PATCH 0/5] Memory controller soft limit patches (v7) Balbir Singh
2009-03-19 16:57 ` [PATCH 1/5] Memory controller soft limit documentation (v7) Balbir Singh
2009-03-19 16:57 ` [PATCH 2/5] Memory controller soft limit interface (v7) Balbir Singh
2009-03-19 16:57 ` [PATCH 3/5] Memory controller soft limit organize cgroups (v7) Balbir Singh
2009-03-20 3:46 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2009-03-22 14:21 ` Balbir Singh
2009-03-22 23:53 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2009-03-23 3:34 ` Balbir Singh
2009-03-23 3:38 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2009-03-23 4:15 ` Balbir Singh
2009-03-23 4:23 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2009-03-23 8:22 ` Balbir Singh
2009-03-23 8:47 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2009-03-23 9:30 ` Balbir Singh
2009-03-25 4:59 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2009-03-25 5:29 ` Balbir Singh
2009-03-25 5:39 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2009-03-25 5:53 ` Balbir Singh
2009-03-25 6:01 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2009-03-25 6:21 ` Balbir Singh
2009-03-25 6:38 ` Balbir Singh
2009-03-25 5:07 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2009-03-25 5:18 ` Balbir Singh
2009-03-25 5:22 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2009-03-19 16:57 ` Balbir Singh [this message]
2009-03-20 3:47 ` [PATCH 4/5] Memory controller soft limit refactor reclaim flags (v7) KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2009-03-22 14:21 ` Balbir Singh
2009-03-19 16:57 ` [PATCH 5/5] Memory controller soft limit reclaim on contention (v7) Balbir Singh
2009-03-20 4:06 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2009-03-22 14:27 ` Balbir Singh
2009-03-23 0:02 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2009-03-23 4:12 ` Balbir Singh
2009-03-23 4:20 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2009-03-23 8:28 ` Balbir Singh
2009-03-23 8:30 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2009-03-23 3:50 ` [PATCH 0/5] Memory controller soft limit patches (v7) KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2009-03-23 5:22 ` Balbir Singh
2009-03-23 5:31 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2009-03-23 6:12 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2009-03-23 6:17 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2009-03-23 6:35 ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2009-03-23 8:24 ` Balbir Singh
2009-03-23 9:12 ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2009-03-23 9:23 ` Balbir Singh
2009-03-23 8:35 ` Balbir Singh
2009-03-23 8:52 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2009-03-23 9:46 ` Balbir Singh
2009-03-23 9:41 ` Balbir Singh
2009-03-23 8:31 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2009-03-24 17:34 ` Balbir Singh
2009-03-24 23:55 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2009-03-25 3:42 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2009-03-25 4:02 ` Balbir Singh
2009-03-25 4:05 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20090319165744.27274.6335.sendpatchset@localhost.localdomain \
--to=balbir@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com \
--cc=kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=lizf@cn.fujitsu.com \
--cc=riel@redhat.com \
--cc=yamamoto@valinux.co.jp \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).