linux-mm.kvack.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Balbir Singh <balbir@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: linux-mm@kvack.org
Cc: YAMAMOTO Takashi <yamamoto@valinux.co.jp>,
	lizf@cn.fujitsu.com,
	KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com>,
	Balbir Singh <balbir@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com>
Subject: [PATCH 4/5] Memory controller soft limit refactor reclaim flags (v7)
Date: Thu, 19 Mar 2009 22:27:44 +0530	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20090319165744.27274.6335.sendpatchset@localhost.localdomain> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20090319165713.27274.94129.sendpatchset@localhost.localdomain>

Impact: Refactor mem_cgroup_hierarchical_reclaim()

From: Balbir Singh <balbir@linux.vnet.ibm.com>

This patch refactors the arguments passed to
mem_cgroup_hierarchical_reclaim() into flags, so that new parameters don't
have to be passed as we make the reclaim routine more flexible


Signed-off-by: Balbir Singh <balbir@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
---

 mm/memcontrol.c |   27 ++++++++++++++++++++-------
 1 files changed, 20 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)


diff --git a/mm/memcontrol.c b/mm/memcontrol.c
index f5b61b8..992aac8 100644
--- a/mm/memcontrol.c
+++ b/mm/memcontrol.c
@@ -227,6 +227,14 @@ pcg_default_flags[NR_CHARGE_TYPE] = {
 #define MEMFILE_TYPE(val)	(((val) >> 16) & 0xffff)
 #define MEMFILE_ATTR(val)	((val) & 0xffff)
 
+/*
+ * Reclaim flags for mem_cgroup_hierarchical_reclaim
+ */
+#define MEM_CGROUP_RECLAIM_NOSWAP_BIT	0x0
+#define MEM_CGROUP_RECLAIM_NOSWAP	(1 << MEM_CGROUP_RECLAIM_NOSWAP_BIT)
+#define MEM_CGROUP_RECLAIM_SHRINK_BIT	0x1
+#define MEM_CGROUP_RECLAIM_SHRINK	(1 << MEM_CGROUP_RECLAIM_SHRINK_BIT)
+
 static void mem_cgroup_get(struct mem_cgroup *mem);
 static void mem_cgroup_put(struct mem_cgroup *mem);
 static struct mem_cgroup *parent_mem_cgroup(struct mem_cgroup *mem);
@@ -889,11 +897,14 @@ mem_cgroup_select_victim(struct mem_cgroup *root_mem)
  * If shrink==true, for avoiding to free too much, this returns immedieately.
  */
 static int mem_cgroup_hierarchical_reclaim(struct mem_cgroup *root_mem,
-				   gfp_t gfp_mask, bool noswap, bool shrink)
+						gfp_t gfp_mask,
+						unsigned long reclaim_options)
 {
 	struct mem_cgroup *victim;
 	int ret, total = 0;
 	int loop = 0;
+	bool noswap = reclaim_options & MEM_CGROUP_RECLAIM_NOSWAP;
+	bool shrink = reclaim_options & MEM_CGROUP_RECLAIM_SHRINK;
 
 	while (loop < 2) {
 		victim = mem_cgroup_select_victim(root_mem);
@@ -1029,7 +1040,7 @@ static int __mem_cgroup_try_charge(struct mm_struct *mm,
 
 	while (1) {
 		int ret;
-		bool noswap = false;
+		unsigned long flags = 0;
 
 		ret = res_counter_charge(&mem->res, PAGE_SIZE, &fail_res,
 						&soft_fail_res);
@@ -1042,7 +1053,7 @@ static int __mem_cgroup_try_charge(struct mm_struct *mm,
 				break;
 			/* mem+swap counter fails */
 			res_counter_uncharge(&mem->res, PAGE_SIZE, NULL);
-			noswap = true;
+			flags |= MEM_CGROUP_RECLAIM_NOSWAP;
 			mem_over_limit = mem_cgroup_from_res_counter(fail_res,
 									memsw);
 		} else
@@ -1054,7 +1065,7 @@ static int __mem_cgroup_try_charge(struct mm_struct *mm,
 			goto nomem;
 
 		ret = mem_cgroup_hierarchical_reclaim(mem_over_limit, gfp_mask,
-							noswap, false);
+							flags);
 		if (ret)
 			continue;
 
@@ -1766,7 +1777,7 @@ int mem_cgroup_shrink_usage(struct page *page,
 
 	do {
 		progress = mem_cgroup_hierarchical_reclaim(mem,
-					gfp_mask, true, false);
+					gfp_mask, MEM_CGROUP_RECLAIM_NOSWAP);
 		progress += mem_cgroup_check_under_limit(mem);
 	} while (!progress && --retry);
 
@@ -1821,7 +1832,7 @@ static int mem_cgroup_resize_limit(struct mem_cgroup *memcg,
 			break;
 
 		progress = mem_cgroup_hierarchical_reclaim(memcg, GFP_KERNEL,
-						   false, true);
+						   MEM_CGROUP_RECLAIM_SHRINK);
 		curusage = res_counter_read_u64(&memcg->res, RES_USAGE);
 		/* Usage is reduced ? */
   		if (curusage >= oldusage)
@@ -1869,7 +1880,9 @@ int mem_cgroup_resize_memsw_limit(struct mem_cgroup *memcg,
 		if (!ret)
 			break;
 
-		mem_cgroup_hierarchical_reclaim(memcg, GFP_KERNEL, true, true);
+		mem_cgroup_hierarchical_reclaim(memcg, GFP_KERNEL,
+						MEM_CGROUP_RECLAIM_NOSWAP |
+						MEM_CGROUP_RECLAIM_SHRINK);
 		curusage = res_counter_read_u64(&memcg->memsw, RES_USAGE);
 		/* Usage is reduced ? */
 		if (curusage >= oldusage)

-- 
	Balbir

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>

  parent reply	other threads:[~2009-03-19 16:58 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 54+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2009-03-19 16:57 [PATCH 0/5] Memory controller soft limit patches (v7) Balbir Singh
2009-03-19 16:57 ` [PATCH 1/5] Memory controller soft limit documentation (v7) Balbir Singh
2009-03-19 16:57 ` [PATCH 2/5] Memory controller soft limit interface (v7) Balbir Singh
2009-03-19 16:57 ` [PATCH 3/5] Memory controller soft limit organize cgroups (v7) Balbir Singh
2009-03-20  3:46   ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2009-03-22 14:21     ` Balbir Singh
2009-03-22 23:53       ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2009-03-23  3:34         ` Balbir Singh
2009-03-23  3:38           ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2009-03-23  4:15             ` Balbir Singh
2009-03-23  4:23               ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2009-03-23  8:22                 ` Balbir Singh
2009-03-23  8:47                   ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2009-03-23  9:30                     ` Balbir Singh
2009-03-25  4:59   ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2009-03-25  5:29     ` Balbir Singh
2009-03-25  5:39       ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2009-03-25  5:53         ` Balbir Singh
2009-03-25  6:01           ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2009-03-25  6:21             ` Balbir Singh
2009-03-25  6:38               ` Balbir Singh
2009-03-25  5:07   ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2009-03-25  5:18     ` Balbir Singh
2009-03-25  5:22       ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2009-03-19 16:57 ` Balbir Singh [this message]
2009-03-20  3:47   ` [PATCH 4/5] Memory controller soft limit refactor reclaim flags (v7) KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2009-03-22 14:21     ` Balbir Singh
2009-03-19 16:57 ` [PATCH 5/5] Memory controller soft limit reclaim on contention (v7) Balbir Singh
2009-03-20  4:06   ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2009-03-22 14:27     ` Balbir Singh
2009-03-23  0:02       ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2009-03-23  4:12         ` Balbir Singh
2009-03-23  4:20           ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2009-03-23  8:28             ` Balbir Singh
2009-03-23  8:30               ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2009-03-23  3:50 ` [PATCH 0/5] Memory controller soft limit patches (v7) KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2009-03-23  5:22   ` Balbir Singh
2009-03-23  5:31     ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2009-03-23  6:12     ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2009-03-23  6:17       ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2009-03-23  6:35         ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2009-03-23  8:24           ` Balbir Singh
2009-03-23  9:12             ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2009-03-23  9:23               ` Balbir Singh
2009-03-23  8:35         ` Balbir Singh
2009-03-23  8:52           ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2009-03-23  9:46             ` Balbir Singh
2009-03-23  9:41       ` Balbir Singh
2009-03-23  8:31 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2009-03-24 17:34 ` Balbir Singh
2009-03-24 23:55   ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2009-03-25  3:42     ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2009-03-25  4:02       ` Balbir Singh
2009-03-25  4:05         ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20090319165744.27274.6335.sendpatchset@localhost.localdomain \
    --to=balbir@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com \
    --cc=kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=lizf@cn.fujitsu.com \
    --cc=riel@redhat.com \
    --cc=yamamoto@valinux.co.jp \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).