From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@sisk.pl>
To: Wu Fengguang <fengguang.wu@intel.com>
Cc: pm list <linux-pm@lists.linux-foundation.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, Pavel Machek <pavel@ucw.cz>,
Nigel Cunningham <nigel@tuxonice.net>,
David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com>,
"linux-mm@kvack.org" <linux-mm@kvack.org>
Subject: [RFC][PATCH 1/6] mm: Introduce __GFP_NO_OOM_KILL
Date: Sun, 10 May 2009 15:50:08 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <200905101550.09671.rjw@sisk.pl> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200905101548.57557.rjw@sisk.pl>
From: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
> > Remind me: why can't we just allocate N pages at suspend-time?
>
> We need half of memory free. The reason we can't "just allocate" is
> probably OOM killer; but my memories are quite weak :-(.
hm. You'd think that with our splendid range of __GFP_foo falgs, there
would be some combo which would suit this requirement but I can't
immediately spot one.
We can always add another I guess. Something like...
[rjw: fixed white space, added comment in page_alloc.c]
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl>
---
include/linux/gfp.h | 3 ++-
mm/page_alloc.c | 8 ++++++--
2 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
Index: linux-2.6/mm/page_alloc.c
===================================================================
--- linux-2.6.orig/mm/page_alloc.c
+++ linux-2.6/mm/page_alloc.c
@@ -1619,8 +1619,12 @@ nofail_alloc:
goto got_pg;
}
- /* The OOM killer will not help higher order allocs so fail */
- if (order > PAGE_ALLOC_COSTLY_ORDER) {
+ /*
+ * The OOM killer will not help higher order allocs so fail.
+ * Also fail if the caller doesn't want the OOM killer to run.
+ */
+ if (order > PAGE_ALLOC_COSTLY_ORDER
+ || (gfp_mask & __GFP_NO_OOM_KILL)) {
clear_zonelist_oom(zonelist, gfp_mask);
goto nopage;
}
Index: linux-2.6/include/linux/gfp.h
===================================================================
--- linux-2.6.orig/include/linux/gfp.h
+++ linux-2.6/include/linux/gfp.h
@@ -51,8 +51,9 @@ struct vm_area_struct;
#define __GFP_THISNODE ((__force gfp_t)0x40000u)/* No fallback, no policies */
#define __GFP_RECLAIMABLE ((__force gfp_t)0x80000u) /* Page is reclaimable */
#define __GFP_MOVABLE ((__force gfp_t)0x100000u) /* Page is movable */
+#define __GFP_NO_OOM_KILL ((__force gfp_t)0x200000u) /* Don't invoke out_of_memory() */
-#define __GFP_BITS_SHIFT 21 /* Room for 21 __GFP_FOO bits */
+#define __GFP_BITS_SHIFT 22 /* Number of __GFP_FOO bits */
#define __GFP_BITS_MASK ((__force gfp_t)((1 << __GFP_BITS_SHIFT) - 1))
/* This equals 0, but use constants in case they ever change */
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-05-10 14:46 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 58+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <200905070040.08561.rjw@sisk.pl>
2009-05-07 21:48 ` [RFC][PATCH 0/5] PM/Hibernate: Rework memory shrinking (rev. 2) Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-05-07 21:50 ` [RFC][PATCH 1/5] mm: Introduce __GFP_NO_OOM_KILL Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-05-07 22:24 ` [RFC][PATCH] PM/Freezer: Disable OOM killer when tasks are frozen (was: Re: [RFC][PATCH 1/5] mm: Introduce __GFP_NO_OOM_KILL) Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-05-07 21:51 ` [RFC][PATCH 2/5] PM/Suspend: Do not shrink memory before suspend Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-05-08 8:52 ` Wu Fengguang
2009-05-07 21:51 ` [RFC][PATCH 3/5] PM/Hibernate: Move memory shrinking to snapshot.c (rev. 2) Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-05-08 8:53 ` Wu Fengguang
2009-05-07 21:53 ` [RFC][PATCH 4/5] PM/Hibernate: Rework shrinking of memory Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-05-07 21:55 ` [RFC][PATCH 5/5] PM/Hibernate: Do not release preallocated memory unnecessarily Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-05-10 13:48 ` [RFC][PATCH 0/6] PM/Hibernate: Rework memory shrinking (rev. 3) Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-05-10 13:50 ` Rafael J. Wysocki [this message]
2009-05-11 20:12 ` [RFC][PATCH 1/6] mm: Introduce __GFP_NO_OOM_KILL David Rientjes
2009-05-11 22:14 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-05-11 22:33 ` Andrew Morton
2009-05-11 23:04 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-05-10 13:50 ` [RFC][PATCH 2/6] PM/Suspend: Do not shrink memory before suspend Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-05-10 13:51 ` [RFC][PATCH 3/6] PM/Hibernate: Move memory shrinking to snapshot.c (rev. 2) Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-05-10 13:53 ` [RFC][PATCH 4/6] PM/Hibernate: Rework shrinking of memory Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-05-10 13:57 ` [RFC][PATCH 5/6] PM/Hibernate: Do not release preallocated memory unnecessarily Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-05-10 19:49 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-05-10 14:12 ` [RFC][PATCH 6/6] PM/Hibernate: Estimate hard core working set size Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-05-10 19:53 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-05-13 8:32 ` [RFC][PATCH 0/6] PM/Hibernate: Rework memory shrinking (rev. 4) Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-05-13 8:34 ` [PATCH 1/6] PM/Suspend: Do not shrink memory before suspend Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-05-13 8:35 ` [PATCH 2/6] PM/Hibernate: Move memory shrinking to snapshot.c (rev. 2) Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-05-13 8:37 ` [PATCH 3/6] mm, PM/Freezer: Disable OOM killer when tasks are frozen Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-05-13 9:19 ` Pavel Machek
2009-05-13 22:35 ` David Rientjes
2009-05-13 22:47 ` Andrew Morton
2009-05-13 23:01 ` David Rientjes
2009-05-13 8:39 ` [PATCH 4/6] PM/Hibernate: Rework shrinking of memory Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-05-13 19:34 ` Andrew Morton
2009-05-13 20:55 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-05-13 21:16 ` Andrew Morton
2009-05-13 21:56 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-05-14 9:40 ` Pavel Machek
2009-05-14 17:49 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-05-15 13:09 ` Pavel Machek
2009-05-14 18:26 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-05-13 8:40 ` [PATCH 5/6] PM/Hibernate: Do not release preallocated memory unnecessarily (rev. 2) Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-05-14 11:09 ` Pavel Machek
2009-05-14 17:52 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-05-15 13:11 ` Pavel Machek
2009-05-15 14:52 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-05-13 8:42 ` [RFC][PATCH 6/6] PM/Hibernate: Do not try to allocate too much memory too hard Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-05-14 11:14 ` Pavel Machek
2009-05-14 17:59 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-05-15 13:14 ` Pavel Machek
2009-05-15 14:40 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-05-17 12:06 ` Wu Fengguang
2009-05-17 12:55 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-05-17 14:07 ` Wu Fengguang
2009-05-17 16:53 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-05-18 8:32 ` Wu Fengguang
2009-05-17 21:14 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-05-18 8:56 ` Wu Fengguang
2009-05-18 17:07 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-05-19 0:47 ` Wu Fengguang
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=200905101550.09671.rjw@sisk.pl \
--to=rjw@sisk.pl \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=fengguang.wu@intel.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=linux-pm@lists.linux-foundation.org \
--cc=nigel@tuxonice.net \
--cc=pavel@ucw.cz \
--cc=rientjes@google.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).