From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail203.messagelabs.com (mail203.messagelabs.com [216.82.254.243]) by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D9B3D6B004D for ; Mon, 11 May 2009 08:26:53 -0400 (EDT) Date: Mon, 11 May 2009 14:27:11 +0200 From: Ingo Molnar Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] memcg fix stale swap cache account leak v6 Message-ID: <20090511122711.GF13954@elte.hu> References: <20090508140528.c34ae712.kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com> <20090508140910.bb07f5c6.kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com> <20090508113820.GL11596@elte.hu> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org To: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki Cc: "linux-mm@kvack.org" , "nishimura@mxp.nes.nec.co.jp" , "balbir@linux.vnet.ibm.com" , "hugh@veritas.com" , "akpm@linux-foundation.org" , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" List-ID: * KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki wrote: > > Isnt the right solution to have a better LRU that is aware of > > this, instead of polling around in the hope of cleaning up stale > > entries? > > I tried to modify LRU in the last month but I found it's > difficult. But your patch makes such a correct solution even more difficult to achieve, so in that sense it might be a step backwards, right? Ingo -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: email@kvack.org