Re: [PATCH 4/6] PM/Hibernate: Rework shrinking of memory

["Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@sisk.pl>]

On Wednesday 13 May 2009, Andrew Morton wrote:
> On Wed, 13 May 2009 22:55:03 +0200
> "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@sisk.pl> wrote:
> 
> > On Wednesday 13 May 2009, Andrew Morton wrote:
> > > On Wed, 13 May 2009 10:39:25 +0200
> > > "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@sisk.pl> wrote:
> > > 
> > > > From: Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl>
> > > > 
> > > > Rework swsusp_shrink_memory() so that it calls shrink_all_memory()
> > > > just once to make some room for the image and then allocates memory
> > > > to apply more pressure to the memory management subsystem, if
> > > > necessary.
> > > > 
> > > > Unfortunately, we don't seem to be able to drop shrink_all_memory()
> > > > entirely just yet, because that would lead to huge performance
> > > > regressions in some test cases.
> > > > 
> > > 
> > > Isn't this a somewhat large problem?
> > 
> > Yes, it is.  The thing is 8 times slower (15 s vs 2 s) without the
> > shrink_all_memory() in at least one test case.  100% reproducible.
> 
> erk.  Any ideas why?

The swapping out things appears to be too slow.  Actually, no wonder, as it is
done one page at a time, while it looks like shrink_all_memory() appears to
make them swap out in big chunks.

> A quick peek at a kernel profile and perhaps the before-and-after delta in
> the /proc/vmstat numbers would probably guide us there.

I'm planning to do some investigation on that later.

> > > The main point (I thought) was to remove shrink_all_memory().  Instead,
> > > we're retaining it and adding even more stuff?
> > 
> > The idea is that afterwards we can drop shrink_all_memory() once the
> > performance problem has been resolved.  Also, we now allocate memory for the
> > image using GFP_KERNEL instead of doing it with GFP_ATOMIC after freezing
> > devices.  I'd think that's an improvement?
> 
> Dunno.  GFP_KERNEL might attempt to do writeback/swapout/etc, which
> could be embarrassing if the devices are frozen.

They aren't, because the preallocation is done upfront, so once the OOM killer
has been taken care of, it's totally safe. :-)

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>