From: Wu Fengguang <fengguang.wu@intel.com>
To: Nick Piggin <npiggin@suse.de>
Cc: Andi Kleen <andi@firstfloor.org>,
"akpm@linux-foundation.org" <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
"linux-mm@kvack.org" <linux-mm@kvack.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] [11/16] HWPOISON: check and isolate corrupted free pages v2
Date: Tue, 9 Jun 2009 22:56:14 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20090609145614.GA5590@localhost> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20090609135514.GD15219@wotan.suse.de>
On Tue, Jun 09, 2009 at 09:55:14PM +0800, Nick Piggin wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 09, 2009 at 09:49:03PM +0800, Wu Fengguang wrote:
> > On Tue, Jun 09, 2009 at 09:28:47PM +0800, Nick Piggin wrote:
> > > And I don't think removing a free page from the page allocator is
> > > too much more complex than removing a live page from the pagecache ;)
> >
> > There are usable functions for doing pagecache isolations, but no one
> > to isolate one specific page from the buddy system.
>
> But it shouldn't be too hard. Anyway you wanted to reinvent your
> own functions for pagecache isolations ;)
Heh.
> > Plus, if we did present such a function, you'll then ask for it being
> > included in page_alloc.c, injecting a big chunk of dead code into the
> > really hot code blocks and possibly polluting the L2 cache. Will it be
>
> But you would say no because you like it better in your memory
> isolation file ;)
I would like to align with your principle on this one :)
> > better than just inserting several lines? Hardly. Smaller text itself
> > yields faster speed.
>
> Oh speed I'm definitely thinking about, don't worry about that.
>
> Moving hot and cold functions together could become an issue
> indeed. Mostly it probably matters a little less than code
> within a single function due to their size. But I think gcc
> already has options to annotate this kind of thing which we
> could be using.
Can we tell gcc "I bet this _function_ is rarely used"?
> So it's not such a good argument against moving things out of
> hotpaths, or guiding in which files to place functions.
Yes.
> Anyway, in this case it is not a "nack" from me. Just that I
> would like to see the non-fastpath code too or at least if
> it can be thought about.
I think Andi would be pleased to present you with his buddy page
isolation code :)
Thanks,
Fengguang
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-06-09 14:46 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 71+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-06-03 18:46 [PATCH] [0/16] HWPOISON: Intro Andi Kleen
2009-06-03 18:46 ` [PATCH] [1/16] HWPOISON: Add page flag for poisoned pages Andi Kleen
2009-06-03 18:46 ` [PATCH] [2/16] HWPOISON: Export some rmap vma locking to outside world Andi Kleen
2009-06-03 18:46 ` [PATCH] [3/16] HWPOISON: Add support for poison swap entries v2 Andi Kleen
2009-06-03 18:46 ` [PATCH] [4/16] HWPOISON: Add new SIGBUS error codes for hardware poison signals Andi Kleen
2009-06-03 18:46 ` [PATCH] [5/16] HWPOISON: Add basic support for poisoned pages in fault handler v3 Andi Kleen
2009-06-03 18:46 ` [PATCH] [6/16] HWPOISON: Add various poison checks in mm/memory.c Andi Kleen
2009-06-04 4:26 ` Wu Fengguang
2009-06-04 5:19 ` Andi Kleen
2009-06-04 11:55 ` Wu Fengguang
2009-06-04 12:52 ` Andi Kleen
2009-06-04 12:50 ` Wu Fengguang
2009-06-04 13:02 ` Andi Kleen
2009-06-04 13:16 ` Wu Fengguang
2009-06-09 10:25 ` Nick Piggin
2009-06-09 12:21 ` Wu Fengguang
2009-06-09 12:35 ` Nick Piggin
2009-06-03 18:46 ` [PATCH] [7/16] HWPOISON: x86: Add VM_FAULT_HWPOISON handling to x86 page fault handler v2 Andi Kleen
2009-06-09 9:54 ` Nick Piggin
2009-06-09 12:34 ` [PATCH] HWPOISON: define VM_FAULT_HWPOISON to 0 when feature is disabled Wu Fengguang
2009-06-03 18:46 ` [PATCH] [8/16] HWPOISON: Use bitmask/action code for try_to_unmap behaviour Andi Kleen
2009-06-09 9:57 ` Nick Piggin
2009-06-10 2:27 ` Wu Fengguang
2009-06-10 6:07 ` Nick Piggin
2009-06-03 18:46 ` [PATCH] [9/16] HWPOISON: Handle hardware poisoned pages in try_to_unmap Andi Kleen
2009-06-04 4:35 ` Wu Fengguang
2009-06-04 5:21 ` Andi Kleen
2009-06-03 18:46 ` [PATCH] [10/16] HWPOISON: Handle poisoned pages in set_page_dirty() Andi Kleen
2009-06-04 0:36 ` Wu Fengguang
2009-06-04 5:27 ` Andi Kleen
2009-06-09 9:59 ` Nick Piggin
2009-06-09 12:51 ` Wu Fengguang
2009-06-03 18:46 ` [PATCH] [11/16] HWPOISON: check and isolate corrupted free pages v2 Andi Kleen
2009-06-09 10:02 ` Nick Piggin
2009-06-09 13:03 ` Wu Fengguang
2009-06-09 13:28 ` Nick Piggin
2009-06-09 13:49 ` Wu Fengguang
2009-06-09 13:55 ` Nick Piggin
2009-06-09 14:56 ` Wu Fengguang [this message]
2009-06-09 15:31 ` Nick Piggin
2009-06-03 18:46 ` [PATCH] [12/16] Refactor truncate to allow direct truncating of page Andi Kleen
2009-06-04 4:32 ` Wu Fengguang
2009-06-04 5:20 ` Andi Kleen
2009-06-03 18:46 ` [PATCH] [13/16] HWPOISON: The high level memory error handler in the VM v5 Andi Kleen
2009-06-04 3:24 ` Wu Fengguang
2009-06-04 5:13 ` Andi Kleen
2009-06-04 9:07 ` Wu Fengguang
2009-06-04 9:26 ` Andi Kleen
2009-06-09 9:51 ` Nick Piggin
2009-06-09 11:14 ` Nick Piggin
2009-06-09 10:09 ` Nick Piggin
2009-06-09 16:05 ` Hugh Dickins
2009-06-09 16:35 ` Nick Piggin
2009-06-10 8:38 ` Wu Fengguang
2009-06-10 8:59 ` Nick Piggin
2009-06-10 9:20 ` Wu Fengguang
2009-06-10 11:03 ` Nick Piggin
2009-06-10 12:16 ` Wu Fengguang
2009-06-10 12:36 ` Nick Piggin
2009-06-12 9:58 ` Andi Kleen
2009-06-10 3:10 ` [PATCH] HWPOISON: fix tasklist_lock/anon_vma locking order Wu Fengguang
2009-06-03 18:46 ` [PATCH] [14/16] HWPOISON: FOR TESTING: Enable memory failure code unconditionally Andi Kleen
2009-06-03 18:46 ` [PATCH] [15/16] HWPOISON: Add madvise() based injector for hardware poisoned pages v3 Andi Kleen
2009-06-03 18:46 ` [PATCH] [16/16] HWPOISON: Add simple debugfs interface to inject hwpoison on arbitary PFNs Andi Kleen
2009-06-09 10:20 ` [PATCH] [0/16] HWPOISON: Intro Nick Piggin
2009-06-10 9:07 ` Wu Fengguang
2009-06-10 9:18 ` Nick Piggin
2009-06-10 9:45 ` Wu Fengguang
2009-06-10 11:15 ` Nick Piggin
2009-06-10 12:36 ` Wu Fengguang
2009-06-10 12:47 ` Nick Piggin
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20090609145614.GA5590@localhost \
--to=fengguang.wu@intel.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=andi@firstfloor.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=npiggin@suse.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).