Re: [PATCH 1/5] HWPOISON: define VM_FAULT_HWPOISON to 0 when feature is disabled

[Theodore Tso <tytso@mit.edu>]

On Fri, Jun 12, 2009 at 05:36:20PM +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> > The data corruption has not caused real hurt yet, and can be 
> > isolated to prevent future accesses.  So it makes sense to just 
> > kill the impacted process(es).
> 
> Dunno, this just looks like a license to allow more crappy hardware, 
> hm? I'm all for _logging_ errors, but hwpoison is not about that: it 
> is about allowing the hardware to limp along in 'enterprise' setups, 
> with a (false looking) 'guarantee' that everything is fine.

This should be tunable; in some cases, logging it is the right thing
to do; I imagine that in the case of the desktop OS, the user would
appreciate being given *some* chance to save the document he or she
has spent the past hour working on before the system goes down "hard
and fast".

In other cases, the sysadmin is using a high-availability setup in an
enterprise deployment, and there he or she would want the system to
immediately shutdown so the hot standby can take over.

	    	     	    		    	 - Ted

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>