From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail202.messagelabs.com (mail202.messagelabs.com [216.82.254.227]) by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) with SMTP id C6F756B005D for ; Tue, 16 Jun 2009 15:43:24 -0400 (EDT) Date: Tue, 16 Jun 2009 14:44:30 -0500 From: Russ Anderson Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/22] HWPOISON: Intro (v5) Message-ID: <20090616194430.GA9545@sgi.com> Reply-To: Russ Anderson References: <20090615024520.786814520@intel.com> <4A35BD7A.9070208@linux.vnet.ibm.com> <20090615042753.GA20788@localhost> <20090615140019.4e405d37@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk> <20090615132934.GE31969@one.firstfloor.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20090615132934.GE31969@one.firstfloor.org> Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org To: Andi Kleen Cc: Alan Cox , Hugh Dickins , Wu Fengguang , Balbir Singh , Andrew Morton , LKML , Ingo Molnar , Mel Gorman , Thomas Gleixner , "H. Peter Anvin" , Peter Zijlstra , Nick Piggin , "riel@redhat.com" , "chris.mason@oracle.com" , "linux-mm@kvack.org" , rja@sgi.com List-ID: On Mon, Jun 15, 2009 at 03:29:34PM +0200, Andi Kleen wrote: > > I think you're wrong about killing processes decreasing > reliability. Traditionally we always tried to keep things running if possible > instead of panicing. Customers love the ia64 feature of killing a user process instead of panicing the system when a user process hits a memory uncorrectable error. Avoiding a system panic is a very good thing. -- Russ Anderson, OS RAS/Partitioning Project Lead SGI - Silicon Graphics Inc rja@sgi.com -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: email@kvack.org