From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail202.messagelabs.com (mail202.messagelabs.com [216.82.254.227]) by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 67EE36B0055 for ; Wed, 17 Jun 2009 07:48:15 -0400 (EDT) Date: Wed, 17 Jun 2009 13:49:43 +0200 From: Jan Kara Subject: Re: [PATCH 01/11] ext3: Get rid of extenddisksize parameter of ext3_get_blocks_handle() Message-ID: <20090617114943.GC2612@duck.suse.cz> References: <1245088797-29533-1-git-send-email-jack@suse.cz> <1245088797-29533-2-git-send-email-jack@suse.cz> <20090617102810.GA29931@wotan.suse.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20090617102810.GA29931@wotan.suse.de> Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org To: Nick Piggin Cc: Jan Kara , LKML , linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Wed 17-06-09 12:28:10, Nick Piggin wrote: > On Mon, Jun 15, 2009 at 07:59:48PM +0200, Jan Kara wrote: > > Get rid of extenddisksize parameter of ext3_get_blocks_handle(). This seems to > > be a relict from some old days and setting disksize in this function does not > > make much sence. Currently it was set only by ext3_getblk(). Since the > > parameter has some effect only if create == 1, it is easy to check that the > > three callers which end up calling ext3_getblk() with create == 1 (ext3_append, > > ext3_quota_write, ext3_mkdir) do the right thing and set disksize themselves. > > > > Signed-off-by: Jan Kara > > I guess something like this should just go in this merge window if > ext3 developers are happy with it? There is no real reason to keep > it with the main patchset is there? Yes, I'll merge this separately. It's in the series just because ext3 patches depend on it. Honza -- Jan Kara SUSE Labs, CR -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: email@kvack.org