From: Wu Fengguang <fengguang.wu@intel.com>
To: Nick Piggin <npiggin@suse.de>
Cc: Andi Kleen <andi@firstfloor.org>,
Balbir Singh <balbir@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>,
Mel Gorman <mel@csn.ul.ie>, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>,
Hugh Dickins <hugh.dickins@tiscali.co.uk>,
"riel@redhat.com" <riel@redhat.com>,
"chris.mason@oracle.com" <chris.mason@oracle.com>,
"linux-mm@kvack.org" <linux-mm@kvack.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH] HWPOISON: only early kill processes who installed SIGBUS handler
Date: Thu, 18 Jun 2009 17:56:44 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20090618095644.GA1422@localhost> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20090617080404.GB31192@wotan.suse.de>
On Wed, Jun 17, 2009 at 04:04:04PM +0800, Nick Piggin wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 17, 2009 at 02:37:02PM +0800, Wu Fengguang wrote:
> > On Mon, Jun 15, 2009 at 10:22:25PM +0800, Wu Fengguang wrote:
> > > On Mon, Jun 15, 2009 at 08:25:28PM +0800, Nick Piggin wrote:
> > > > On Mon, Jun 15, 2009 at 08:10:01PM +0800, Wu Fengguang wrote:
> > > > > On Mon, Jun 15, 2009 at 03:19:07PM +0800, Nick Piggin wrote:
> > > > > > > For KVM you need early kill, for the others it remains to be seen.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Right. It's almost like you need to do a per-process thing, and
> > > > > > those that can handle things (such as the new SIGBUS or the new
> > > > > > EIO) could get those, and others could be killed.
> > > > >
> > > > > To send early SIGBUS kills to processes who has called
> > > > > sigaction(SIGBUS, ...)? KVM will sure do that. For other apps we
> > > > > don't mind they can understand that signal at all.
> > > >
> > > > For apps that hook into SIGBUS for some other means and
> > >
> > > Yes I was referring to the sigaction(SIGBUS) apps, others will
> > > be late killed anyway.
> > >
> > > > do not understand the new type of SIGBUS signal? What about
> > > > those?
> > >
> > > We introduced two new SIGBUS codes:
> > > BUS_MCEERR_AO=5 for early kill
> > > BUS_MCEERR_AR=4 for late kill
> > > I'd assume a legacy application will handle them in the same way (both
> > > are unexpected code to the application).
> > >
> > > We don't care whether the application can be killed by BUS_MCEERR_AO
> > > or BUS_MCEERR_AR depending on its SIGBUS handler implementation.
> > > But (in the rare case) if the handler
> > > - refused to die on BUS_MCEERR_AR, it may create a busy loop and
> > > flooding of SIGBUS signals, which is a bug of the application.
> > > BUS_MCEERR_AO is one time and won't lead to busy loops.
> > > - does something that hurts itself (ie. data safety) on BUS_MCEERR_AO,
> > > it may well hurt the same way on BUS_MCEERR_AR. The latter one is
> > > unavoidable, so the application must be fixed anyway.
> >
> > This patch materializes the automatically early kill idea.
> > It aims to remove the vm.memory_failure_ealy_kill sysctl parameter.
> >
> > This is mainly a policy change, please comment.
>
> Well then you can still early-kill random apps that did not
> want it, and you may still cause problems if its sigbus
> handler does something nontrivial.
>
> Can you use a prctl or something so it can expclitly
> register interest in this?
OK, this patch allows one to request early kill by calling
prctl(PR_MEMORY_FAILURE_EARLY_KILL, 1, ...).
Now either app or admin can choose to enable/disable early kill on
a per-process basis. But still, an admin won't be able to change the
behavior of an application who calls prctl() to set the option by itself.
Thanks,
Fengguang
---
include/linux/prctl.h | 6 ++++++
include/linux/sched.h | 1 +
kernel/sys.c | 6 ++++++
mm/memory-failure.c | 12 ++++++++++--
4 files changed, 23 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
--- sound-2.6.orig/include/linux/prctl.h
+++ sound-2.6/include/linux/prctl.h
@@ -88,4 +88,10 @@
#define PR_TASK_PERF_COUNTERS_DISABLE 31
#define PR_TASK_PERF_COUNTERS_ENABLE 32
+/*
+ * Send early SIGBUS.BUS_MCEERR_AO notification on memory corruption?
+ * Useful for KVM and mission critical apps.
+ */
+#define PR_MEMORY_FAILURE_EARLY_KILL 33
+
#endif /* _LINUX_PRCTL_H */
--- sound-2.6.orig/include/linux/sched.h
+++ sound-2.6/include/linux/sched.h
@@ -1666,6 +1666,7 @@ extern cputime_t task_gtime(struct task_
#define PF_MEMALLOC 0x00000800 /* Allocating memory */
#define PF_FLUSHER 0x00001000 /* responsible for disk writeback */
#define PF_USED_MATH 0x00002000 /* if unset the fpu must be initialized before use */
+#define PF_EARLY_KILL 0x00004000 /* early kill me on memory failure */
#define PF_NOFREEZE 0x00008000 /* this thread should not be frozen */
#define PF_FROZEN 0x00010000 /* frozen for system suspend */
#define PF_FSTRANS 0x00020000 /* inside a filesystem transaction */
--- sound-2.6.orig/kernel/sys.c
+++ sound-2.6/kernel/sys.c
@@ -1545,6 +1545,12 @@ SYSCALL_DEFINE5(prctl, int, option, unsi
current->timer_slack_ns = arg2;
error = 0;
break;
+ case PR_MEMORY_FAILURE_EARLY_KILL:
+ if (arg2)
+ me->flags |= PF_EARLY_KILL;
+ else
+ me->flags &= ~PF_EARLY_KILL;
+ break;
default:
error = -EINVAL;
break;
--- sound-2.6.orig/mm/memory-failure.c
+++ sound-2.6/mm/memory-failure.c
@@ -205,6 +205,14 @@ static void kill_procs_ao(struct list_he
}
}
+static bool task_early_kill_elegible(struct task_struct *tsk)
+{
+ if (!tsk->mm)
+ return false;
+
+ return tsk->flags & PF_EARLY_KILL;
+}
+
/*
* Collect processes when the error hit an anonymous page.
*/
@@ -222,7 +230,7 @@ static void collect_procs_anon(struct pa
goto out;
for_each_process (tsk) {
- if (!tsk->mm)
+ if (!task_early_kill_elegible(tsk))
continue;
list_for_each_entry (vma, &av->head, anon_vma_node) {
if (!page_mapped_in_vma(page, vma))
@@ -262,7 +270,7 @@ static void collect_procs_file(struct pa
for_each_process(tsk) {
pgoff_t pgoff = page->index << (PAGE_CACHE_SHIFT - PAGE_SHIFT);
- if (!tsk->mm)
+ if (!task_early_kill_elegible(tsk))
continue;
vma_prio_tree_foreach(vma, &iter, &mapping->i_mmap, pgoff,
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-06-18 9:55 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 79+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-06-15 2:45 [PATCH 00/22] HWPOISON: Intro (v5) Wu Fengguang
2009-06-15 2:45 ` [PATCH 01/22] HWPOISON: Add page flag for poisoned pages Wu Fengguang
2009-06-15 2:45 ` [PATCH 02/22] HWPOISON: Export some rmap vma locking to outside world Wu Fengguang
2009-06-15 2:45 ` [PATCH 03/22] HWPOISON: Add support for poison swap entries v2 Wu Fengguang
2009-06-15 2:45 ` [PATCH 04/22] HWPOISON: Add new SIGBUS error codes for hardware poison signals Wu Fengguang
2009-06-15 2:45 ` [PATCH 05/22] HWPOISON: Add basic support for poisoned pages in fault handler v3 Wu Fengguang
2009-06-15 2:45 ` [PATCH 06/22] HWPOISON: x86: Add VM_FAULT_HWPOISON handling to x86 page fault handler v2 Wu Fengguang
2009-06-15 2:45 ` [PATCH 07/22] HWPOISON: define VM_FAULT_HWPOISON to 0 when feature is disabled Wu Fengguang
2009-06-15 2:45 ` [PATCH 08/22] HWPOISON: Use bitmask/action code for try_to_unmap behaviour Wu Fengguang
2009-06-15 2:45 ` [PATCH 09/22] HWPOISON: Handle hardware poisoned pages in try_to_unmap Wu Fengguang
2009-06-15 13:09 ` Minchan Kim
2009-06-15 15:26 ` Wu Fengguang
2009-06-16 0:03 ` Minchan Kim
2009-06-16 13:49 ` Wu Fengguang
2009-06-17 0:28 ` Minchan Kim
2009-06-17 7:23 ` Wu Fengguang
2009-06-17 13:27 ` Minchan Kim
2009-06-17 13:37 ` Wu Fengguang
2009-06-17 13:43 ` Minchan Kim
2009-06-17 14:03 ` Wu Fengguang
2009-06-17 14:08 ` Minchan Kim
2009-06-17 14:12 ` Wu Fengguang
[not found] ` <28c262360906170644w65c08a8y2d2805fb08045804@mail.gmail.com>
[not found] ` <20090617135543.GA8079@localhost>
[not found] ` <28c262360906170703h3363b68dp74471358f647921e@mail.gmail.com>
2009-06-18 12:14 ` Wu Fengguang
2009-06-18 13:31 ` Minchan Kim
2009-06-19 1:58 ` Wu Fengguang
2009-06-15 2:45 ` [PATCH 10/22] HWPOISON: check and isolate corrupted free pages v2 Wu Fengguang
2009-06-15 9:41 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2009-06-15 10:16 ` Wu Fengguang
2009-06-15 23:52 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2009-06-16 0:34 ` Wu Fengguang
2009-06-16 11:29 ` Hugh Dickins
2009-06-16 11:40 ` Wu Fengguang
2009-06-15 2:45 ` [PATCH 11/22] HWPOISON: Refactor truncate to allow direct truncating of page v3 Wu Fengguang
2009-06-15 2:45 ` [PATCH 12/22] HWPOISON: The high level memory error handler in the VM v7 Wu Fengguang
2009-06-15 2:45 ` [PATCH 13/22] HWPOISON: Add madvise() based injector for hardware poisoned pages v3 Wu Fengguang
2009-06-15 2:45 ` [PATCH 14/22] HWPOISON: Add simple debugfs interface to inject hwpoison on arbitary PFNs Wu Fengguang
2009-06-15 2:45 ` [PATCH 15/22] HWPOISON: early kill cleanups and fixes Wu Fengguang
2009-06-15 2:45 ` [PATCH 16/22] mm: move page flag numbers for user space to page-flags.h Wu Fengguang
2009-06-15 2:45 ` [PATCH 17/22] HWPOISON: introduce struct hwpoison_control Wu Fengguang
2009-06-15 2:45 ` [PATCH 18/22] HWPOISON: use compound head page Wu Fengguang
2009-06-15 2:45 ` [PATCH 19/22] HWPOISON: detect free buddy pages explicitly Wu Fengguang
2009-06-15 2:45 ` [PATCH 20/22] HWPOISON: collect infos that reflect the impact of the memory corruption Wu Fengguang
2009-06-15 2:45 ` [PATCH 21/22] HWPOISON: send uevent to report " Wu Fengguang
2009-06-15 6:29 ` Andi Kleen
2009-06-15 9:56 ` Wu Fengguang
2009-06-16 0:35 ` Greg KH
2009-06-15 2:45 ` [PATCH 22/22] HWPOISON: FOR TESTING: Enable memory failure code unconditionally Wu Fengguang
2009-06-15 3:18 ` [PATCH 00/22] HWPOISON: Intro (v5) Balbir Singh
2009-06-15 4:27 ` Wu Fengguang
2009-06-15 6:44 ` Nick Piggin
2009-06-15 7:09 ` Andi Kleen
2009-06-15 7:19 ` Nick Piggin
2009-06-15 12:10 ` Wu Fengguang
2009-06-15 12:25 ` Nick Piggin
2009-06-15 14:22 ` Wu Fengguang
2009-06-17 6:37 ` [RFC][PATCH] HWPOISON: only early kill processes who installed SIGBUS handler Wu Fengguang
2009-06-17 8:04 ` Nick Piggin
2009-06-17 9:55 ` Wu Fengguang
2009-06-17 10:00 ` Nick Piggin
2009-06-17 11:56 ` Wu Fengguang
2009-06-18 9:56 ` Wu Fengguang [this message]
2009-06-15 8:14 ` [PATCH 00/22] HWPOISON: Intro (v5) Nick Piggin
2009-06-15 10:09 ` Wu Fengguang
2009-06-15 10:36 ` Nick Piggin
2009-06-15 11:41 ` Wu Fengguang
2009-06-15 12:51 ` Hugh Dickins
2009-06-15 13:00 ` Alan Cox
2009-06-15 13:29 ` Andi Kleen
2009-06-15 13:28 ` H. Peter Anvin
2009-06-15 14:48 ` Alan Cox
2009-06-15 15:24 ` Andi Kleen
2009-06-15 15:28 ` Alan Cox
2009-06-15 16:19 ` Andi Kleen
2009-06-15 16:28 ` Alan Cox
2009-06-15 17:07 ` Andi Kleen
2009-06-16 19:44 ` Russ Anderson
2009-06-16 20:28 ` H. Peter Anvin
2009-06-16 20:54 ` Russ Anderson
2009-06-16 20:58 ` H. Peter Anvin
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20090618095644.GA1422@localhost \
--to=fengguang.wu@intel.com \
--cc=a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=andi@firstfloor.org \
--cc=balbir@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=chris.mason@oracle.com \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=hugh.dickins@tiscali.co.uk \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=mel@csn.ul.ie \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=npiggin@suse.de \
--cc=riel@redhat.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).