linux-mm.kvack.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Pavel Machek <pavel@ucw.cz>
To: Pekka J Enberg <penberg@cs.helsinki.fi>
Cc: linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, mingo@elte.hu,
	npiggin@suse.de, benh@kernel.crashing.org,
	akpm@linux-foundation.org, cl@linux-foundation.org,
	torvalds@linux-foundation.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] slab,slub: ignore __GFP_WAIT if we're booting or suspending
Date: Fri, 19 Jun 2009 16:59:13 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20090619145913.GA1389@ucw.cz> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.64.0906121201490.30049@melkki.cs.Helsinki.FI>

Hi!

> 
> As explained by Benjamin Herrenschmidt:
> 
>   Oh and btw, your patch alone doesn't fix powerpc, because it's missing
>   a whole bunch of GFP_KERNEL's in the arch code... You would have to
>   grep the entire kernel for things that check slab_is_available() and
>   even then you'll be missing some.
> 
>   For example, slab_is_available() didn't always exist, and so in the
>   early days on powerpc, we used a mem_init_done global that is set form
>   mem_init() (not perfect but works in practice). And we still have code
>   using that to do the test.
> 
> Therefore, ignore __GFP_WAIT in the slab allocators if we're booting or
> suspending.

Ok... GFP_KERNEL allocations normally don't fail; now they
will. Should we at least force access to atomic reserves in such case?
      	     	   	       	      	 		    	 Pavel
-- 
(english) http://www.livejournal.com/~pavelmachek
(cesky, pictures) http://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~pavel/picture/horses/blog.html

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>

  parent reply	other threads:[~2009-06-19 14:57 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 44+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2009-06-12  8:13 [PATCH 2/2] slab,slub: ignore __GFP_WAIT if we're booting or suspending Pekka J Enberg
2009-06-12  9:03 ` [PATCH v2] " Pekka J Enberg
2009-06-12  9:10   ` Ingo Molnar
2009-06-12  9:21     ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2009-06-12  9:24       ` Pekka Enberg
2009-06-12  9:36         ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2009-06-12  9:45           ` Pekka J Enberg
2009-06-12  9:58             ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2009-06-12 10:00               ` Pekka Enberg
2009-06-12 15:22             ` Andrew Morton
2009-06-12  9:49     ` Pekka Enberg
2009-06-12  9:52       ` Nick Piggin
2009-06-12  9:54         ` Pekka Enberg
2009-06-12  9:59         ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2009-06-25  4:38           ` Nick Piggin
2009-06-12 10:07       ` Ingo Molnar
2009-06-12 10:11         ` Pekka Enberg
2009-06-12 10:15           ` Nick Piggin
2009-06-12 10:30             ` Pekka J Enberg
2009-06-12 10:32               ` Pekka Enberg
2009-06-12 15:16               ` Linus Torvalds
2009-06-12 15:16                 ` Pekka Enberg
2009-06-12 11:13             ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2009-06-12 11:24               ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2009-06-12 11:11           ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2009-06-12 11:34             ` Pekka Enberg
2009-06-12 11:41               ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2009-06-12 11:43                 ` Pekka Enberg
2009-06-12 15:30               ` Andrew Morton
2009-06-12 21:42                 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2009-06-25  4:41                 ` Nick Piggin
2009-06-12 11:09         ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2009-06-12 15:04   ` Linus Torvalds
2009-06-12 15:05     ` Pekka Enberg
2009-06-19 14:59   ` Pavel Machek [this message]
2009-06-19 22:27     ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2009-06-19 23:23       ` Pavel Machek
2009-06-19 23:50         ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2009-06-20  0:28           ` Pavel Machek
2009-06-20  2:10             ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2009-06-21  6:18               ` Pavel Machek
2009-06-21  9:31                 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2009-06-25  4:34                   ` Nick Piggin
2009-06-25  9:56                     ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20090619145913.GA1389@ucw.cz \
    --to=pavel@ucw.cz \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=benh@kernel.crashing.org \
    --cc=cl@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=mingo@elte.hu \
    --cc=npiggin@suse.de \
    --cc=penberg@cs.helsinki.fi \
    --cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).