From: Wu Fengguang <fengguang.wu@intel.com>
To: KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com>
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
linux-mm <linux-mm@kvack.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com>,
Minchan Kim <minchan.kim@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 1/2] vmscan don't isolate too many pages
Date: Tue, 7 Jul 2009 21:23:51 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20090707132351.GA6075@localhost> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20090707184034.0C70.A69D9226@jp.fujitsu.com>
On Tue, Jul 07, 2009 at 05:47:13PM +0800, KOSAKI Motohiro wrote:
> Subject: [PATCH] vmscan don't isolate too many pages
>
> If the system have plenty threads or processes, concurrent reclaim can
> isolate very much pages.
>
> And if other processes isolate _all_ pages on lru, the reclaimer can't find
> any reclaimable page and it makes accidental OOM.
>
> The solusion is, we should restrict maximum number of isolated pages.
> (this patch use inactive_page/2)
Now I think this is a better solution than per-cpu throttling :)
Will test it tomorrow.
Acked-by: Wu Fengguang <fengguang.wu@intel.com>
>
> FAQ
> -------
> Q: Why do you compared zone accumulate pages, not individual zone pages?
> A: If we check individual zone, #-of-reclaimer is restricted by smallest zone.
> it mean decreasing the performance of the system having small dma zone.
>
>
> Signed-off-by: KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com>
> ---
> mm/page_alloc.c | 27 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> 1 file changed, 27 insertions(+)
>
> Index: b/mm/page_alloc.c
> ===================================================================
> --- a/mm/page_alloc.c
> +++ b/mm/page_alloc.c
> @@ -1721,6 +1721,28 @@ gfp_to_alloc_flags(gfp_t gfp_mask)
> return alloc_flags;
> }
>
> +static bool too_many_isolated(struct zonelist *zonelist,
> + enum zone_type high_zoneidx, nodemask_t *nodemask)
> +{
> + unsigned long nr_inactive = 0;
> + unsigned long nr_isolated = 0;
> + struct zoneref *z;
> + struct zone *zone;
> +
> + for_each_zone_zonelist_nodemask(zone, z, zonelist,
> + high_zoneidx, nodemask) {
> + if (!populated_zone(zone))
> + continue;
> +
> + nr_inactive += zone_page_state(zone, NR_INACTIVE_ANON);
> + nr_inactive += zone_page_state(zone, NR_INACTIVE_FILE);
> + nr_isolated += zone_page_state(zone, NR_ISOLATED_ANON);
> + nr_isolated += zone_page_state(zone, NR_ISOLATED_FILE);
> + }
> +
> + return nr_isolated > nr_inactive;
> +}
> +
> static inline struct page *
> __alloc_pages_slowpath(gfp_t gfp_mask, unsigned int order,
> struct zonelist *zonelist, enum zone_type high_zoneidx,
> @@ -1789,6 +1811,11 @@ rebalance:
> if (p->flags & PF_MEMALLOC)
> goto nopage;
>
> + if (too_many_isolated(gfp_mask, zonelist, high_zoneidx, nodemask)) {
> + schedule_timeout_uninterruptible(HZ/10);
> + goto restart;
> + }
> +
> /* Try direct reclaim and then allocating */
> page = __alloc_pages_direct_reclaim(gfp_mask, order,
> zonelist, high_zoneidx,
>
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-07-07 13:23 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-07-07 9:40 [RFC PATCH 0/2] fix unnecessary accidental OOM problem on concurrent reclaim KOSAKI Motohiro
2009-07-07 9:47 ` [RFC PATCH 1/2] vmscan don't isolate too many pages KOSAKI Motohiro
2009-07-07 13:23 ` Wu Fengguang [this message]
2009-07-07 18:59 ` Rik van Riel
2009-07-08 3:19 ` Wu Fengguang
2009-07-09 1:51 ` [RFC PATCH 1/2] vmscan don't isolate too many pages in a zone Rik van Riel
2009-07-09 2:47 ` Wu Fengguang
2009-07-09 3:07 ` Wu Fengguang
2009-07-09 7:01 ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2009-07-09 8:42 ` Wu Fengguang
2009-07-09 11:07 ` Minchan Kim
2009-07-09 6:39 ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2009-07-07 23:39 ` [RFC PATCH 1/2] vmscan don't isolate too many pages Minchan Kim
2009-07-09 3:12 ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2009-07-07 9:48 ` [RFC PATCH 2/2] Don't continue reclaim if the system have plenty free memory KOSAKI Motohiro
2009-07-07 13:20 ` Minchan Kim
2009-07-09 5:08 ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2009-07-09 10:58 ` Minchan Kim
2009-07-13 0:37 ` KOSAKI Motohiro
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20090707132351.GA6075@localhost \
--to=fengguang.wu@intel.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=minchan.kim@gmail.com \
--cc=riel@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).