From: Wu Fengguang <fengguang.wu@gmail.com>
To: John Stoffel <john@stoffel.org>
Cc: Gene Heskett <gene.heskett@verizon.net>,
Linux Kernel list <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
"linux-mm@kvack.org" <linux-mm@kvack.org>,
Minchan Kim <minchan.kim@gmail.com>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@sisk.pl>,
Kernel Testers List <kernel-testers@vger.kernel.org>,
David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>,
KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com>
Subject: Re: OOM killer in 2.6.31-rc2
Date: Fri, 10 Jul 2009 21:18:01 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20090710131801.GA17773@localhost> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <19031.15772.404288.544946@stoffel.org>
On Fri, Jul 10, 2009 at 09:09:48AM -0400, John Stoffel wrote:
> >>>>> "Gene" == Gene Heskett <gene.heskett@verizon.net> writes:
>
> Gene> On Thursday 09 July 2009, John Stoffel wrote:
> >>>>>>> "Gene" == Gene Heskett <gene.heskett@verizon.net> writes:
> >>
> Gene> On Wednesday 08 July 2009, Wu Fengguang wrote:
> >>>> On Wed, Jul 08, 2009 at 01:15:15PM +0800, Wu Fengguang wrote:
> >>>>> On Tue, Jul 07, 2009 at 11:42:07PM -0400, Gene Heskett wrote:
> >>
> Gene> [...]
> >>
> >>>>> I guess your near 800MB slab cache is somehow under scanned.
> >>>>
> >>>> Gene, can you run .31 with this patch? When OOM happens, it will tell
> >>>> us whether the majority slab pages are reclaimable. Another way to
> >>>> find things out is to run `slabtop` when your system is moderately
> >>>> loaded.
> >>
> Gene> Its been running continuously, and after 24 hours is now showing:
> >>
> >> Just wondering, is this your M2N-SLI Deluxe board?
> Gene> Yes.
> >> I've got the same
> >> board, with 4Gb of RAM and I haven't noticed any loss of RAM from my
> >> looking (quickly) at top output.
>
> Gene> I am short approximately 500 megs according to top:
> Gene> Mem: 3634228k total, 3522984k used, 111244k free, 308096k buffers
> Gene> Swap: 8385912k total, 568k used, 8385344k free, 2544716k cached
>
> Gene> From dmesg:
> Gene> [ 0.000000] TOM2: 0000000120000000 aka 4608M <what is this?
> Gene> [...]
> Gene> [ 0.000000] 2694MB HIGHMEM available.
> Gene> [ 0.000000] 887MB LOWMEM available.
>
> Gene> The bios signon does say 4092M IIRC.
>
> >> But I also haven't bothered to upgrade the BIOS on this board at all
> >> since I got it back in March of 2008. No need in my book so far.
>
> Gene> I had been running the original bios, #1502, because 1604 and
> Gene> 1701 had very poor uptimes. 1502 caused an oops about 15 lines
> Gene> into the boot but that triggered a remap and it was bulletproof
> Gene> after that running a 32 bit 64G+PAE kernel. (I haven't quite
> Gene> made the jump to a 64 bit install, yet...)
>
> Why haven't you made the laep to 64bit yet? To me, that seems to be
> the real solution here, not hacks like the HIGHMEM4G and HIGHMEM64G,
> esp when your hardware is 64Bit by default.
Sure 64bit kernel would be the best option for Gene :)
> I've made the leap and I've never looked back. Haven't missed any
> 32bit only apps, and if I really needed them, I'd just load the 32bit
> libraries if need be.
But for now I'd appreciate a lot if Gene can run a HIGHMEM64G kernel
with the provided patch, so as to collect one full OOM message for us
to analyze :) The previous OOM message missed the most important data
from zone Normal..
Thanks,
Fengguang
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-07-10 12:53 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <200907061056.00229.gene.heskett@verizon.net>
2009-07-07 6:12 ` OOM killer in 2.6.31-rc2 Wu Fengguang
2009-07-07 14:57 ` Gene Heskett
2009-07-08 2:17 ` Wu Fengguang
2009-07-08 3:42 ` Gene Heskett
2009-07-08 5:15 ` Wu Fengguang
2009-07-08 7:55 ` Wu Fengguang
2009-07-08 14:22 ` Gene Heskett
2009-07-09 14:42 ` Gene Heskett
2009-07-09 20:41 ` John Stoffel
2009-07-09 21:03 ` Gene Heskett
2009-07-10 13:09 ` John Stoffel
2009-07-10 13:18 ` Wu Fengguang [this message]
2009-07-10 13:24 ` Wu Fengguang
[not found] ` <200907101100.58110.gene.heskett@verizon.net>
[not found] ` <20090711083551.GA6209@localhost>
[not found] ` <200907110819.30337.gene.heskett@verizon.net>
2009-07-12 5:14 ` Wu Fengguang
2009-07-14 4:10 ` Gene Heskett
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20090710131801.GA17773@localhost \
--to=fengguang.wu@gmail.com \
--cc=dhowells@redhat.com \
--cc=gene.heskett@verizon.net \
--cc=john@stoffel.org \
--cc=kernel-testers@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=minchan.kim@gmail.com \
--cc=rjw@sisk.pl \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).