public inbox for linux-mm@kvack.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com>
To: Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>
Cc: kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com,
	LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	linux-mm <linux-mm@kvack.org>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	Wu Fengguang <fengguang.wu@intel.com>,
	Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com>,
	Minchan Kim <minchan.kim@gmail.com>,
	Christoph Lameter <cl@linux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] Rename pgmoved variable in shrink_active_list()
Date: Fri, 17 Jul 2009 14:43:37 +0900 (JST)	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20090717091920.A90C.A69D9226@jp.fujitsu.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20090716173249.GB2267@cmpxchg.org>

> On Thu, Jul 16, 2009 at 09:52:34AM +0900, KOSAKI Motohiro wrote:
> > Subject: [PATCH] Rename pgmoved variable in shrink_active_list()
> > 
> > Currently, pgmoved variable have two meanings. it cause harder reviewing a bit.
> > This patch separate it.
> > 
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com>
> 
> Reviewed-by: Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>
> 
> Below are just minor suggestions regarding the changed code.
> 
> > ---
> >  mm/vmscan.c |   16 ++++++++--------
> >  1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
> > 
> > Index: b/mm/vmscan.c
> > ===================================================================
> > --- a/mm/vmscan.c
> > +++ b/mm/vmscan.c
> > @@ -1239,7 +1239,7 @@ static void move_active_pages_to_lru(str
> >  static void shrink_active_list(unsigned long nr_pages, struct zone *zone,
> >  			struct scan_control *sc, int priority, int file)
> >  {
> > -	unsigned long pgmoved;
> > +	unsigned long nr_taken;
> >  	unsigned long pgscanned;
> >  	unsigned long vm_flags;
> >  	LIST_HEAD(l_hold);	/* The pages which were snipped off */
> > @@ -1247,10 +1247,11 @@ static void shrink_active_list(unsigned 
> >  	LIST_HEAD(l_inactive);
> >  	struct page *page;
> >  	struct zone_reclaim_stat *reclaim_stat = get_reclaim_stat(zone, sc);
> > +	unsigned long nr_rotated = 0;
> >  
> >  	lru_add_drain();
> >  	spin_lock_irq(&zone->lru_lock);
> > -	pgmoved = sc->isolate_pages(nr_pages, &l_hold, &pgscanned, sc->order,
> > +	nr_taken = sc->isolate_pages(nr_pages, &l_hold, &pgscanned, sc->order,
> >  					ISOLATE_ACTIVE, zone,
> >  					sc->mem_cgroup, 1, file);
> >  	/*
> > @@ -1260,16 +1261,15 @@ static void shrink_active_list(unsigned 
> >  	if (scanning_global_lru(sc)) {
> >  		zone->pages_scanned += pgscanned;
> >  	}
> > -	reclaim_stat->recent_scanned[!!file] += pgmoved;
> > +	reclaim_stat->recent_scanned[!!file] += nr_taken;
> 
> Hm, file is a boolean already, the double negation can probably be
> dropped.
> 
> >  	__count_zone_vm_events(PGREFILL, zone, pgscanned);
> >  	if (file)
> > -		__mod_zone_page_state(zone, NR_ACTIVE_FILE, -pgmoved);
> > +		__mod_zone_page_state(zone, NR_ACTIVE_FILE, -nr_taken);
> >  	else
> > -		__mod_zone_page_state(zone, NR_ACTIVE_ANON, -pgmoved);
> > +		__mod_zone_page_state(zone, NR_ACTIVE_ANON, -nr_taken);
> 
> Should perhaps be in another patch, but we could use
> 
> 	__mod_zone_page_state(zone, LRU_ACTIVE + file * LRU_FILE);
> 
> like in the call to move_active_pages_to_lru().
>
> >  	spin_unlock_irq(&zone->lru_lock);
> >  
> > -	pgmoved = 0;  /* count referenced (mapping) mapped pages */
> >  	while (!list_empty(&l_hold)) {
> >  		cond_resched();
> >  		page = lru_to_page(&l_hold);
> > @@ -1283,7 +1283,7 @@ static void shrink_active_list(unsigned 
> >  		/* page_referenced clears PageReferenced */
> >  		if (page_mapping_inuse(page) &&
> >  		    page_referenced(page, 0, sc->mem_cgroup, &vm_flags)) {
> > -			pgmoved++;
> > +			nr_rotated++;
> >  			/*
> >  			 * Identify referenced, file-backed active pages and
> >  			 * give them one more trip around the active list. So
> > @@ -1312,7 +1312,7 @@ static void shrink_active_list(unsigned 
> >  	 * helps balance scan pressure between file and anonymous pages in
> >  	 * get_scan_ratio.
> >  	 */
> > -	reclaim_stat->recent_rotated[!!file] += pgmoved;
> > +	reclaim_stat->recent_rotated[!!file] += nr_rotated;
> 
> file is boolean.
> 
> There is one more double negation in isolate_pages_global() that can
> be dropped as well.  If you agree, I can submit all those changes in
> separate patches.

Yeah, thanks please. 



--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>

  reply	other threads:[~2009-07-17  5:43 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 30+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2009-07-16  0:51 [PATCH 0/3] Account the number of isolate pages KOSAKI Motohiro
2009-07-16  0:52 ` [PATCH 1/3] Rename pgmoved variable in shrink_active_list() KOSAKI Motohiro
2009-07-16  2:08   ` Rik van Riel
2009-07-16  3:16   ` Andrew Morton
2009-07-16  4:01     ` Minchan Kim
2009-07-16  4:22     ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2009-07-16  4:35       ` Andrew Morton
2009-07-16  4:38         ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2009-07-16  4:46           ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2009-07-16  4:49           ` Andrew Morton
2009-07-16  4:00   ` Minchan Kim
2009-07-16 12:33   ` Wu Fengguang
2009-07-16 14:11   ` Christoph Lameter
2009-07-16 17:32   ` Johannes Weiner
2009-07-17  5:43     ` KOSAKI Motohiro [this message]
2009-07-16  0:53 ` [PATCH 2/3] mm: shrink_inactive_lis() nr_scan accounting fix fix KOSAKI Motohiro
2009-07-16  2:10   ` Rik van Riel
2009-07-16  4:10   ` Minchan Kim
2009-07-16 12:55   ` Wu Fengguang
2009-07-17  0:16     ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2009-07-16  0:55 ` [PATCH 3/3] add isolate pages vmstat KOSAKI Motohiro
2009-07-16  3:16   ` Andrew Morton
2009-07-16  4:22     ` Minchan Kim
2009-07-16  4:35     ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2009-07-16 14:26   ` Christoph Lameter
2009-07-17  7:00     ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2009-07-17 16:34       ` Christoph Lameter
2009-07-20  5:39         ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2009-07-20 15:27           ` Christoph Lameter
2009-07-20 16:22             ` KOSAKI Motohiro

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20090717091920.A90C.A69D9226@jp.fujitsu.com \
    --to=kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=cl@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=fengguang.wu@intel.com \
    --cc=hannes@cmpxchg.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=minchan.kim@gmail.com \
    --cc=riel@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox