From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail202.messagelabs.com (mail202.messagelabs.com [216.82.254.227]) by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9673D6B0055 for ; Mon, 20 Jul 2009 03:48:23 -0400 (EDT) Received: from d12nrmr1607.megacenter.de.ibm.com (d12nrmr1607.megacenter.de.ibm.com [9.149.167.49]) by mtagate3.de.ibm.com (8.14.3/8.13.8) with ESMTP id n6K7mLkQ110008 for ; Mon, 20 Jul 2009 07:48:21 GMT Received: from d12av02.megacenter.de.ibm.com (d12av02.megacenter.de.ibm.com [9.149.165.228]) by d12nrmr1607.megacenter.de.ibm.com (8.13.8/8.13.8/NCO v9.2) with ESMTP id n6K7mLew2514962 for ; Mon, 20 Jul 2009 09:48:21 +0200 Received: from d12av02.megacenter.de.ibm.com (loopback [127.0.0.1]) by d12av02.megacenter.de.ibm.com (8.12.11.20060308/8.13.3) with ESMTP id n6K7mK4n006521 for ; Mon, 20 Jul 2009 09:48:20 +0200 Date: Mon, 20 Jul 2009 09:48:18 +0200 From: Martin Schwidefsky Subject: Re: [RFC/PATCH] mm: Pass virtual address to [__]p{te,ud,md}_free_tlb() Message-ID: <20090720094818.641e6375@skybase> In-Reply-To: <1248073873.13067.31.camel@pasglop> References: <20090715074952.A36C7DDDB2@ozlabs.org> <20090715135620.GD7298@wotan.suse.de> <1248073873.13067.31.camel@pasglop> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org To: Benjamin Herrenschmidt Cc: Nick Piggin , Linux Memory Management , Linux-Arch , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org, Hugh Dickins , Linus Torvalds List-ID: On Mon, 20 Jul 2009 17:11:13 +1000 Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote: > On Wed, 2009-07-15 at 15:56 +0200, Nick Piggin wrote: > > > I would like to merge the new support that depends on this in 2.6.32, > > > so unless there's major objections, I'd like this to go in early during > > > the merge window. We can sort out separately how to carry the patch > > > around in -next until then since the powerpc tree will have a dependency > > > on it. > > > > Can't see any problem with that. > > CC'ing Linus here. How do you want to proceed with that merge ? (IE. so > far nobody objected to the patch itself) > > IE. The patch affects all archs, though it's a trivial change every > time, but I'll have stuff in powerpc-next that depends on it, and so I'm > not sure what the right approach is here. Should I put it in the powerpc > tree ? > > I also didn't have any formal Ack from anybody, neither mm folks nor > arch maintainers :-) Well the change is trivial, it just adds another unused argument to the macros. For the records: it still compiles on s390. -- blue skies, Martin. "Reality continues to ruin my life." - Calvin. -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: email@kvack.org