From: Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>
To: Christoph Lameter <cl@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com>,
linux-mm@kvack.org
Subject: Re: [patch 4/4] mm: return boolean from page_has_private()
Date: Wed, 22 Jul 2009 19:50:31 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20090722175031.GA3484@cmpxchg.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <alpine.DEB.1.10.0907221220350.3588@gentwo.org>
On Wed, Jul 22, 2009 at 12:49:44PM -0400, Christoph Lameter wrote:
> On Tue, 21 Jul 2009, Johannes Weiner wrote:
>
> > Make page_has_private() return a true boolean value and remove the
> > double negations from the two callsites using it for arithmetic.
>
> page_has_private_data()?
I am not so fond of changing that, because then we should probably
also rename page_private() and that is moot for slightly improved
source code English.
> Also note that you are adding unecessary double negation to the other
> callers. Does the compiler catch that?
Yes, callsites using it in a conditionals do not change here with gcc
4.3.3.
> > +static inline int page_has_private(struct page *page)
> > +{
> > + return !!(page->flags & ((1 << PG_private) | (1 << PG_private_2)));
> > +}
>
> Two private bits? How did that happen?
fscache :)
> Could we define a PAGE_FLAGS_PRIVATE in page-flags.h?
It would certainly look nicer, I will add that.
> > diff --git a/mm/vmscan.c b/mm/vmscan.c
> > index 6b368d3..67e2824 100644
> > --- a/mm/vmscan.c
> > +++ b/mm/vmscan.c
> > @@ -286,7 +286,7 @@ static inline int page_mapping_inuse(struct page *page)
> >
> > static inline int is_page_cache_freeable(struct page *page)
> > {
> > - return page_count(page) - !!page_has_private(page) == 2;
> > + return page_count(page) - page_has_private(page) == 2;
>
> That looks funky and in need of comments.
Agreed, I will add one in a different patch.
Hannes
---
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-07-22 17:51 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-07-21 8:56 [patch 1/4] mm: drop unneeded double negations Johannes Weiner
2009-07-21 8:56 ` [patch 2/4] mm: introduce page_lru_type() Johannes Weiner
2009-07-22 1:52 ` Minchan Kim
2009-07-22 9:07 ` Johannes Weiner
2009-07-22 12:37 ` Minchan Kim
2009-07-22 16:01 ` Rik van Riel
2009-07-21 8:56 ` [patch 3/4] mm: return boolean from page_is_file_cache() Johannes Weiner
2009-07-21 8:56 ` [patch 4/4] mm: return boolean from page_has_private() Johannes Weiner
2009-07-22 16:49 ` Christoph Lameter
2009-07-22 17:50 ` Johannes Weiner [this message]
2009-07-22 17:54 ` [patch 5/4] mm: document is_page_cache_freeable() Johannes Weiner
2009-07-22 19:02 ` Christoph Lameter
2009-07-22 21:55 ` Li, Ming Chun
2009-07-22 22:10 ` Johannes Weiner
2009-07-22 23:51 ` Li, Ming Chun
2009-07-22 23:58 ` Christoph Lameter
2009-07-21 9:33 ` [patch 1/4] mm: drop unneeded double negations Mel Gorman
2009-07-21 11:18 ` Johannes Weiner
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20090722175031.GA3484@cmpxchg.org \
--to=hannes@cmpxchg.org \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=cl@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).