linux-mm.kvack.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jens Axboe <jens.axboe@oracle.com>
To: Martin Bligh <mbligh@google.com>
Cc: Chad Talbott <ctalbott@google.com>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org,
	wfg@mail.ustc.edu.cn, Michael Rubin <mrubin@google.com>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@google.com>,
	sandeen@redhat.com
Subject: Re: Bug in kernel 2.6.31, Slow wb_kupdate writeout
Date: Fri, 31 Jul 2009 00:17:28 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20090730221727.GI12579@kernel.dk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <33307c790907301501v4c605ea8oe57762b21d414445@mail.gmail.com>

On Thu, Jul 30 2009, Martin Bligh wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 30, 2009 at 2:39 PM, Jens Axboe<jens.axboe@oracle.com> wrote:
> > On Tue, Jul 28 2009, Chad Talbott wrote:
> >> I run a simple workload on a 4GB machine which dirties a few largish
> >> inodes like so:
> >>
> >> # seq 10 | xargs -P0 -n1 -i\{} dd if=/dev/zero of=/tmp/dump\{}
> >> bs=1024k count=100
> >>
> >> While the dds are running data is written out at disk speed.  However,
> >> once the dds have run to completion and exited there is ~500MB of
> >> dirty memory left.  Background writeout then takes about 3 more
> >> minutes to clean memory at only ~3.3MB/s.  When I explicitly sync, I
> >> can see that the disk is capable of 40MB/s, which finishes off the
> >> files in ~10s. [1]
> >>
> >> An interesting recent-ish change is "writeback: speed up writeback of
> >> big dirty files."  When I revert the change to __sync_single_inode the
> >> problem appears to go away and background writeout proceeds at disk
> >> speed.  Interestingly, that code is in the git commit [2], but not in
> >> the post to LKML. [3]  This is may not be the fix, but it makes this
> >> test behave better.
> >
> > Can I talk you into trying the per-bdi writeback patchset? I just tried
> > your test on a 16gb machine, and the dd's finish immediately since it
> > wont trip the writeout at that percentage of dirty memory. The 1GB of
> > dirty memory is flushed when it gets too old, 30 seconds later in two
> > chunks of writeout running at disk speed.
> 
> How big did you make the dds? It has to be writing more data than
> you have RAM, or it's not going to do anything much interesting ;-)

The test case above on a 4G machine is only generating 1G of dirty data.
I ran the same test case on the 16G, resulting in only background
writeout. The relevant bit here being that the background writeout
finished quickly, writing at disk speed.

I re-ran the same test, but using 300 100MB files instead. While the
dd's are running, we are going at ~80MB/sec (this is disk speed, it's an
x25-m). When the dd's are done, it continues doing 80MB/sec for 10
seconds or so. Then the remainder (about 2G) is written in bursts at
disk speeds, but with some time in between.

-- 
Jens Axboe

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>

  reply	other threads:[~2009-07-30 22:17 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 32+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2009-07-28 19:11 Bug in kernel 2.6.31, Slow wb_kupdate writeout Chad Talbott
2009-07-28 21:49 ` Martin Bligh
2009-07-29  7:15   ` Martin Bligh
2009-07-29 11:43     ` Wu Fengguang
2009-07-29 14:11       ` Martin Bligh
2009-07-30  1:06         ` Wu Fengguang
2009-07-30  1:12           ` Martin Bligh
2009-07-30  1:57             ` Wu Fengguang
2009-07-30  2:59               ` Martin Bligh
2009-07-30  4:08                 ` Wu Fengguang
2009-07-30 19:55                   ` Martin Bligh
2009-08-01  2:02                     ` Wu Fengguang
2009-07-30  0:19       ` Martin Bligh
2009-07-30  1:28         ` Martin Bligh
2009-07-30  2:09           ` Wu Fengguang
2009-07-30  2:57             ` Martin Bligh
2009-07-30  3:19               ` Wu Fengguang
2009-07-30 20:33                 ` Martin Bligh
2009-08-01  2:58                   ` Wu Fengguang
2009-08-01  4:10                   ` Wu Fengguang
2009-07-30  1:49         ` Wu Fengguang
2009-07-30 21:39 ` Jens Axboe
2009-07-30 22:01   ` Martin Bligh
2009-07-30 22:17     ` Jens Axboe [this message]
2009-07-30 22:34       ` Martin Bligh
2009-07-30 22:43         ` Jens Axboe
2009-07-30 22:48           ` Martin Bligh
2009-07-31  7:50             ` Peter Zijlstra
2009-08-01  4:03             ` Wu Fengguang
2009-08-01  4:53               ` Wu Fengguang
2009-08-01  5:03                 ` Wu Fengguang
2009-08-01  4:02         ` Wu Fengguang

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20090730221727.GI12579@kernel.dk \
    --to=jens.axboe@oracle.com \
    --cc=akpm@google.com \
    --cc=ctalbott@google.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=mbligh@google.com \
    --cc=mrubin@google.com \
    --cc=sandeen@redhat.com \
    --cc=wfg@mail.ustc.edu.cn \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).