linux-mm.kvack.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Wu Fengguang <fengguang.wu@intel.com>
To: Martin Bligh <mbligh@google.com>
Cc: Chad Talbott <ctalbott@google.com>,
	"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	"linux-mm@kvack.org" <linux-mm@kvack.org>,
	Michael Rubin <mrubin@google.com>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@google.com>,
	"sandeen@redhat.com" <sandeen@redhat.com>,
	Michael Davidson <md@google.com>
Subject: Re: Bug in kernel 2.6.31, Slow wb_kupdate writeout
Date: Sat, 1 Aug 2009 12:10:42 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20090801041042.GA13747@localhost> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <33307c790907301333i28b571eat29460164d558d370@mail.gmail.com>

On Fri, Jul 31, 2009 at 04:33:09AM +0800, Martin Bligh wrote:
> (BTW: background ... I'm not picking through this code for fun, I'm
> trying to debug writeback problems introduced in our new kernel
> that are affecting Google production workloads ;-))
> 
> >> Well, I see two problems. One is that we set more_io based on
> >> whether s_more_io is empty or not before we finish the loop.
> >> I can't see how this can be correct, especially as there can be
> >> other concurrent writers. So somehow we need to check when
> >> we exit the loop, not during it.
> >
> > It is correct inside the loop, however with some overheads.
> >
> > We put it inside the loop because sometimes the whole filesystem is
> > skipped and we shall not set more_io on them whether or not s_more_io
> > is empty.
> 
> My point was that you're setting more_io based on a condition
> at a point in time that isn't when you return to the caller.
> 
> By the time you return to the caller (after several more loops
> iterations), that condition may no longer be true.
> 
> One other way to address that would to be only to set if if we're
> about to fall off the end of the loop, ie change it to:
> 
> if (!list_empty(&sb->s_more_io) && list_empty(&sb->s_io))
>        wbc->more_io = 1;

Ah I see it (as the below patch), looks reasonable to me.

Thanks,
Fengguang

---
 fs/fs-writeback.c |    4 ++--
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

--- sound-2.6.orig/fs/fs-writeback.c
+++ sound-2.6/fs/fs-writeback.c
@@ -544,9 +544,9 @@ void generic_sync_sb_inodes(struct super
 			wbc->more_io = 1;
 			break;
 		}
-		if (!list_empty(&sb->s_more_io))
-			wbc->more_io = 1;
 	}
+	if (!list_empty(&sb->s_more_io) && list_empty(&sb->s_io))
+			wbc->more_io = 1;
 
 	if (sync) {
 		struct inode *inode, *old_inode = NULL;

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>

  parent reply	other threads:[~2009-08-01  4:10 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 32+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2009-07-28 19:11 Bug in kernel 2.6.31, Slow wb_kupdate writeout Chad Talbott
2009-07-28 21:49 ` Martin Bligh
2009-07-29  7:15   ` Martin Bligh
2009-07-29 11:43     ` Wu Fengguang
2009-07-29 14:11       ` Martin Bligh
2009-07-30  1:06         ` Wu Fengguang
2009-07-30  1:12           ` Martin Bligh
2009-07-30  1:57             ` Wu Fengguang
2009-07-30  2:59               ` Martin Bligh
2009-07-30  4:08                 ` Wu Fengguang
2009-07-30 19:55                   ` Martin Bligh
2009-08-01  2:02                     ` Wu Fengguang
2009-07-30  0:19       ` Martin Bligh
2009-07-30  1:28         ` Martin Bligh
2009-07-30  2:09           ` Wu Fengguang
2009-07-30  2:57             ` Martin Bligh
2009-07-30  3:19               ` Wu Fengguang
2009-07-30 20:33                 ` Martin Bligh
2009-08-01  2:58                   ` Wu Fengguang
2009-08-01  4:10                   ` Wu Fengguang [this message]
2009-07-30  1:49         ` Wu Fengguang
2009-07-30 21:39 ` Jens Axboe
2009-07-30 22:01   ` Martin Bligh
2009-07-30 22:17     ` Jens Axboe
2009-07-30 22:34       ` Martin Bligh
2009-07-30 22:43         ` Jens Axboe
2009-07-30 22:48           ` Martin Bligh
2009-07-31  7:50             ` Peter Zijlstra
2009-08-01  4:03             ` Wu Fengguang
2009-08-01  4:53               ` Wu Fengguang
2009-08-01  5:03                 ` Wu Fengguang
2009-08-01  4:02         ` Wu Fengguang

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20090801041042.GA13747@localhost \
    --to=fengguang.wu@intel.com \
    --cc=akpm@google.com \
    --cc=ctalbott@google.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=mbligh@google.com \
    --cc=md@google.com \
    --cc=mrubin@google.com \
    --cc=sandeen@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).