linux-mm.kvack.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Wu Fengguang <fengguang.wu@intel.com>
To: Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com>
Cc: Jeff Dike <jdike@addtoit.com>, Avi Kivity <avi@redhat.com>,
	Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@redhat.com>,
	"Yu, Wilfred" <wilfred.yu@intel.com>,
	"Kleen, Andi" <andi.kleen@intel.com>,
	Hugh Dickins <hugh.dickins@tiscali.co.uk>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	Christoph Lameter <cl@linux-foundation.org>,
	KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com>,
	Mel Gorman <mel@csn.ul.ie>, LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	linux-mm <linux-mm@kvack.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC] respect the referenced bit of KVM guest pages?
Date: Sun, 16 Aug 2009 19:29:10 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20090816112910.GA3208@localhost> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20090816051502.GB13740@localhost>

On Sun, Aug 16, 2009 at 01:15:02PM +0800, Wu Fengguang wrote:
> On Sun, Aug 16, 2009 at 11:53:00AM +0800, Rik van Riel wrote:
> > Wu Fengguang wrote:
> > > On Fri, Aug 07, 2009 at 05:09:55AM +0800, Jeff Dike wrote:
> > >> Side question -
> > >> 	Is there a good reason for this to be in shrink_active_list()
> > >> as opposed to __isolate_lru_page?
> > >>
> > >> 		if (unlikely(!page_evictable(page, NULL))) {
> > >> 			putback_lru_page(page);
> > >> 			continue;
> > >> 		}
> > >>
> > >> Maybe we want to minimize the amount of code under the lru lock or
> > >> avoid duplicate logic in the isolate_page functions.
> > > 
> > > I guess the quick test means to avoid the expensive page_referenced()
> > > call that follows it. But that should be mostly one shot cost - the
> > > unevictable pages are unlikely to cycle in active/inactive list again
> > > and again.
> > 
> > Please read what putback_lru_page does.
> > 
> > It moves the page onto the unevictable list, so that
> > it will not end up in this scan again.
> 
> Yes it does. I said 'mostly' because there is a small hole that an
> unevictable page may be scanned but still not moved to unevictable
> list: when a page is mapped in two places, the first pte has the
> referenced bit set, the _second_ VMA has VM_LOCKED bit set, then
> page_referenced() will return 1 and shrink_page_list() will move it
> into active list instead of unevictable list. Shall we fix this rare
> case?

How about this fix?

---
mm: stop circulating of referenced mlocked pages

Signed-off-by: Wu Fengguang <fengguang.wu@intel.com>
---

--- linux.orig/mm/rmap.c	2009-08-16 19:11:13.000000000 +0800
+++ linux/mm/rmap.c	2009-08-16 19:22:46.000000000 +0800
@@ -358,6 +358,7 @@ static int page_referenced_one(struct pa
 	 */
 	if (vma->vm_flags & VM_LOCKED) {
 		*mapcount = 1;	/* break early from loop */
+		*vm_flags |= VM_LOCKED;
 		goto out_unmap;
 	}
 
@@ -482,6 +483,8 @@ static int page_referenced_file(struct p
 	}
 
 	spin_unlock(&mapping->i_mmap_lock);
+	if (*vm_flags & VM_LOCKED)
+		referenced = 0;
 	return referenced;
 }
 

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>

  reply	other threads:[~2009-08-16 11:29 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 122+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2009-08-05  2:40 [RFC] respect the referenced bit of KVM guest pages? Wu Fengguang
2009-08-05  4:15 ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2009-08-05  4:41   ` Wu Fengguang
2009-08-05  7:58 ` Avi Kivity
2009-08-05  8:17   ` Avi Kivity
2009-08-05 14:33     ` Rik van Riel
2009-08-05 15:37       ` Avi Kivity
2009-08-05 14:15   ` Rik van Riel
2009-08-05 15:12     ` Avi Kivity
2009-08-05 15:15       ` Rik van Riel
2009-08-05 15:25         ` Avi Kivity
2009-08-05 16:35           ` Andrea Arcangeli
2009-08-05 16:31     ` Andrea Arcangeli
2009-08-05 17:25       ` Rik van Riel
2009-08-05 15:45   ` Dike, Jeffrey G
2009-08-05 16:05   ` Andrea Arcangeli
2009-08-05 16:12     ` Dike, Jeffrey G
2009-08-05 16:19       ` Andrea Arcangeli
2009-08-05 15:58 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2009-08-05 17:20   ` Rik van Riel
2009-08-05 17:42   ` Rik van Riel
2009-08-06 10:15     ` Andrea Arcangeli
2009-08-06 10:08   ` Andrea Arcangeli
2009-08-06 10:18     ` Avi Kivity
2009-08-06 10:20       ` Andrea Arcangeli
2009-08-06 10:59         ` Wu Fengguang
2009-08-06 11:44           ` Avi Kivity
2009-08-06 13:06             ` Wu Fengguang
2009-08-06 13:16               ` Rik van Riel
2009-08-16  3:28                 ` Wu Fengguang
2009-08-16  3:56                   ` Rik van Riel
2009-08-16  4:43                     ` Balbir Singh
2009-08-16  4:55                     ` Wu Fengguang
2009-08-16  5:59                       ` Balbir Singh
2009-08-17 19:47                       ` Dike, Jeffrey G
2009-08-21 18:24                         ` Balbir Singh
2009-08-31 19:43                           ` Dike, Jeffrey G
2009-08-31 19:52                             ` Rik van Riel
2009-08-31 20:06                               ` Dike, Jeffrey G
2009-08-31 20:09                                 ` Rik van Riel
2009-08-31 20:11                                   ` Dike, Jeffrey G
2009-08-31 20:42                                     ` Balbir Singh
2009-08-06 13:46               ` Avi Kivity
2009-08-06 21:09               ` Jeff Dike
2009-08-16  3:18                 ` Wu Fengguang
2009-08-16  3:53                   ` Rik van Riel
2009-08-16  5:15                     ` Wu Fengguang
2009-08-16 11:29                       ` Wu Fengguang [this message]
2009-08-17 14:33                         ` Minchan Kim
2009-08-18  2:34                           ` Wu Fengguang
2009-08-18  4:17                             ` Minchan Kim
2009-08-18  9:31                               ` Wu Fengguang
2009-08-18  9:52                                 ` Minchan Kim
2009-08-18 10:00                                   ` Wu Fengguang
2009-08-18 11:00                                     ` Minchan Kim
2009-08-18 11:11                                       ` Wu Fengguang
2009-08-18 14:03                                         ` Minchan Kim
2009-08-18 16:27                                         ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2009-08-18 15:57                         ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2009-08-19 12:01                           ` Wu Fengguang
2009-08-19 12:05                             ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2009-08-19 12:10                               ` Wu Fengguang
2009-08-19 12:25                                 ` Minchan Kim
2009-08-19 13:19                                   ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2009-08-19 13:28                                     ` Minchan Kim
2009-08-21 11:17                                       ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2009-08-19 13:24                                   ` Wu Fengguang
2009-08-19 13:38                                     ` Minchan Kim
2009-08-19 14:00                                       ` Wu Fengguang
2009-08-06 13:13             ` Rik van Riel
2009-08-06 13:49               ` Avi Kivity
2009-08-07  3:11               ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2009-08-07  7:54                 ` Balbir Singh
2009-08-07  8:24                   ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2009-08-06 13:11           ` Rik van Riel
2009-08-06 13:08     ` Rik van Riel
2009-08-07  3:17       ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2009-08-12  7:48         ` Wu Fengguang
2009-08-12 14:31           ` Rik van Riel
2009-08-13  1:03             ` Wu Fengguang
2009-08-13 15:46               ` Rik van Riel
2009-08-13 16:12                 ` Avi Kivity
2009-08-13 16:26                   ` Rik van Riel
2009-08-13 19:12                     ` Avi Kivity
2009-08-13 21:16                       ` Johannes Weiner
2009-08-14  7:16                         ` Avi Kivity
2009-08-14  9:10                           ` Johannes Weiner
2009-08-14  9:51                             ` Wu Fengguang
2009-08-14 13:19                               ` Rik van Riel
2009-08-15  5:45                                 ` Wu Fengguang
2009-08-16  5:09                                   ` Balbir Singh
2009-08-16  5:41                                     ` Wu Fengguang
2009-08-16  5:50                                     ` Wu Fengguang
2009-08-18 15:57                                     ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2009-08-17 18:04                                   ` Dike, Jeffrey G
2009-08-18  2:26                                     ` Wu Fengguang
2009-09-02 19:30                                       ` Dike, Jeffrey G
2009-09-03  2:04                                         ` Wu Fengguang
2009-09-04 20:06                                           ` Dike, Jeffrey G
2009-09-04 20:57                                             ` Rik van Riel
2009-08-18 15:57                                   ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2009-08-19 12:08                                     ` Wu Fengguang
2009-08-19 13:40                                     ` [RFC] memcg: move definitions to .h and inline some functions Wu Fengguang
2009-08-19 14:18                                       ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2009-08-19 14:27                                         ` Balbir Singh
2009-08-20  1:34                                           ` Wu Fengguang
2009-08-14 21:42                               ` [RFC] respect the referenced bit of KVM guest pages? Dike, Jeffrey G
2009-08-14 22:37                                 ` Rik van Riel
2009-08-15  5:32                                   ` Wu Fengguang
2009-09-13 16:23                                 ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2009-08-05 17:53 ` Rik van Riel
2009-08-05 19:00   ` Dike, Jeffrey G
2009-08-05 19:07     ` Rik van Riel
2009-08-05 19:18       ` Dike, Jeffrey G
2009-08-06  9:22         ` Avi Kivity
2009-08-06  9:25           ` Wu Fengguang
2009-08-06  9:35             ` Avi Kivity
2009-08-06  9:35               ` Wu Fengguang
2009-08-06  9:59                 ` Avi Kivity
2009-08-06  9:59                   ` Wu Fengguang
2009-08-06 10:14                     ` Avi Kivity
2009-08-07  1:25                       ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20090816112910.GA3208@localhost \
    --to=fengguang.wu@intel.com \
    --cc=aarcange@redhat.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=andi.kleen@intel.com \
    --cc=avi@redhat.com \
    --cc=cl@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=hugh.dickins@tiscali.co.uk \
    --cc=jdike@addtoit.com \
    --cc=kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=mel@csn.ul.ie \
    --cc=riel@redhat.com \
    --cc=wilfred.yu@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).