Re: [RFC][PATCH 1/5] memcg: change for softlimit.

[Balbir Singh <balbir@linux.vnet.ibm.com>]

* KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com> [2009-08-29 00:12:26]:

> Balbir Singh wrote:
> > * KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com> [2009-08-29
> > 00:06:23]:
> >
> >> Balbir Singh wrote:
> >> > * KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com> [2009-08-28
> >> > 23:40:56]:
> >> >
> >> >> KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki wrote:
> >> >> > Balbir Singh wrote:
> >> >> >> But Bob and Mike might need to set soft limits between themselves.
> >> if
> >> >> >> soft limit of gold is 1G and bob needs to be close to 750M and
> >> mike
> >> >> >> 250M, how do we do it without supporting what we have today?
> >> >> >>
> >> >> > Don't use hierarchy or don't use softlimit.
> >> >> > (I never think fine-grain  soft limit can be useful.)
> >> >> >
> >> >> > Anyway, I have to modify unnecessary hacks for res_counter of
> >> >> softlimit.
> >> >> > plz allow modification. that's bad.
> >> >> > I postpone RB-tree breakage problem, plz explain it or fix it by
> >> >> yourself.
> >> >> >
> >> >> I changed my mind....per-zone RB-tree is also broken ;)
> >> >>
> >> >> Why I don't like broken system is a function which a user can't
> >> >> know/calculate how-it-works is of no use in mission critical systems.
> >> >>
> >> >> I'd like to think how-to-fix it with better algorithm. Maybe RB-tree
> >> >> is not a choice.
> >> >>
> >> >
> >> > Soft limits are not meant for mission critical work :-) Soft limits is
> >> > best effort and not a guaranteed resource allocation mechanism. I've
> >> > mentioned in previous emails how we recover if we find the data is
> >> > stale
> >> >
> >> yes. but can you explain how selection will be done to users ?
> >> I can't.
> >>
> >
> > From a user point, we get what we set, but the timelines can be a
> > little longer.
> >
> I'll drop this patch, anyway. But will modify res_counter.
> We have to reduce ops under lock after we see spinlock can explode
> system time.
>

Thanks! I'll review the other patches as well and test them sometime
over the weekend. 

-- 
	Balbir

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>