From: Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>
To: Minchan Kim <minchan.kim@gmail.com>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [patch] mm: use-once mapped file pages
Date: Wed, 16 Sep 2009 21:04:31 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20090916190431.GA20897@cmpxchg.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <28c262360909150826s2a0f5f0dpd111640f92d0f5ff@mail.gmail.com>
Hello Minchan,
On Wed, Sep 16, 2009 at 12:26:27AM +0900, Minchan Kim wrote:
> Hi, Hannes.
[snapped stuff Rik answered already]
> > When dropping into reclaim, the VM has a hard time making progress
> > with these pages dominating. A And since all mapped pages are treated
> > equally (i.e. anon pages as well), a major part of the anon working
> > set is swapped out before the hashing completes as well.
> >
> > Failing reclaim and swapping show up pretty quickly in decreasing
> > overall system interactivity, but also in the throughput of the
> > hashing process itself.
> >
> > This patch implements a use-once strategy for mapped file pages.
> >
> > For this purpose, mapped file pages with page table references are not
> > directly activated at the end of the inactive list anymore but marked
> > with PG_referenced and sent on another roundtrip on the inactive list.
> > If such a page comes in again, another page table reference activates
> > it while the lack thereof leads to its eviction.
> >
> > The deactivation path does not clear this mark so that a subsequent
> > page table reference for a page coming from the active list means
> > reactivation as well.
>
> It seems to be good idea. but I have a concern about embedded.
> AFAIK, some CPUs don't have accessed bit by hardware.
> maybe ARM series.
> (Nowadays, Some kinds of CPU series just supports access bit.
> but there are still CPUs that doesn't support it)
>
> I am not sure there are others architecture.
> Your idea makes mapped page reclaim depend on access bit more tightly.
> :(
ARM seems to emulate the accessed bit by ensuring a subsequent access
will fault when the young bit is cleared, so we should get one extra
minor fault per finally activated mapped file page as a trade-off.
I am not too concerned about that because it should be a rather rare
event. Only fresh pages go through that. PG_referenced is remembered
over activation/deactivation and once it's set, a page is treated just
like it is now: activated if referenced, reclaimed if not.
So yeah, there is a bit more overhead for ARM to approximate the
working set initially. But the results are more trustworthy and we
get rid of a badly performing corner case in the VM.
> > diff --git a/mm/rmap.c b/mm/rmap.c
> > index 28aafe2..0c88813 100644
> > --- a/mm/rmap.c
> > +++ b/mm/rmap.c
> > @@ -508,9 +508,6 @@ int page_referenced(struct page *page,
> > A {
> > A A A A int referenced = 0;
> >
> > - A A A if (TestClearPageReferenced(page))
> > - A A A A A A A referenced++;
> > -
This hunk should also get removed from the !CONFIG_MMU dummy function.
I'll wait a bit for more feedback and send a fixed revision.
Thanks,
Hannes
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>
prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-09-16 19:04 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-09-14 23:46 [patch] mm: use-once mapped file pages Johannes Weiner
2009-09-15 15:26 ` Minchan Kim
2009-09-15 16:01 ` Rik van Riel
2009-09-16 19:04 ` Johannes Weiner [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20090916190431.GA20897@cmpxchg.org \
--to=hannes@cmpxchg.org \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=minchan.kim@gmail.com \
--cc=riel@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).