linux-mm.kvack.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Mel Gorman <mel@csn.ul.ie>
To: Pekka Enberg <penberg@cs.helsinki.fi>
Cc: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>, Nick Piggin <npiggin@suse.de>,
	Christoph Lameter <cl@linux-foundation.org>,
	heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com, sachinp@in.ibm.com,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] slqb: Do not use DEFINE_PER_CPU for per-node data
Date: Mon, 21 Sep 2009 09:46:44 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20090921084644.GD12726@csn.ul.ie> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1253514240.5216.3.camel@penberg-laptop>

On Mon, Sep 21, 2009 at 09:24:00AM +0300, Pekka Enberg wrote:
> Hi Tejun,
> 
> On Mon, 2009-09-21 at 00:55 +0900, Tejun Heo wrote:
> > Pekka Enberg wrote:
> > > Tejun Heo wrote:
> > >> Pekka Enberg wrote:
> > >>> On Fri, Sep 18, 2009 at 10:34 PM, Mel Gorman <mel@csn.ul.ie> wrote:
> > >>>> SLQB used a seemingly nice hack to allocate per-node data for the
> > >>>> statically
> > >>>> initialised caches. Unfortunately, due to some unknown per-cpu
> > >>>> optimisation, these regions are being reused by something else as the
> > >>>> per-node data is getting randomly scrambled. This patch fixes the
> > >>>> problem but it's not fully understood *why* it fixes the problem at the
> > >>>> moment.
> > >>> Ouch, that sounds bad. I guess it's architecture specific bug as x86
> > >>> works ok? Lets CC Tejun.
> > >>
> > >> Is the corruption being seen on ppc or s390?
> > > 
> > > On ppc.
> > 
> > Can you please post full dmesg showing the corruption?  Also, if you
> > apply the attached patch, does the added BUG_ON() trigger?
> 
> I don't have the affected machines, Sachin and Mel do.
> 

More accurately, Sachin does but he gave me access to the machine for
this bug so I can use it when it's otherwise idle.

> 			Pekka
> 
> > diff --git a/include/linux/percpu.h b/include/linux/percpu.h
> > index 878836c..fb690d2 100644
> > --- a/include/linux/percpu.h
> > +++ b/include/linux/percpu.h
> > @@ -127,7 +127,7 @@ extern int __init pcpu_page_first_chunk(size_t reserved_size,
> >   * dynamically allocated. Non-atomic access to the current CPU's
> >   * version should probably be combined with get_cpu()/put_cpu().
> >   */
> > -#define per_cpu_ptr(ptr, cpu)	SHIFT_PERCPU_PTR((ptr), per_cpu_offset((cpu)))
> > +#define per_cpu_ptr(ptr, cpu)	({ BUG_ON(!(ptr)); SHIFT_PERCPU_PTR((ptr), per_cpu_offset((cpu))); })
> > 
> >  extern void *__alloc_reserved_percpu(size_t size, size_t align);
> 

-- 
Mel Gorman
Part-time Phd Student                          Linux Technology Center
University of Limerick                         IBM Dublin Software Lab

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>

  reply	other threads:[~2009-09-21  8:46 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 29+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2009-09-18 19:34 [RFC PATCH 0/3] Hatchet job for SLQB on memoryless configurations Mel Gorman
2009-09-18 19:34 ` [PATCH 1/3] slqb: Do not use DEFINE_PER_CPU for per-node data Mel Gorman
2009-09-20  8:45   ` Pekka Enberg
2009-09-20 10:00     ` Tejun Heo
2009-09-20 10:12       ` Pekka Enberg
2009-09-20 15:55         ` Tejun Heo
2009-09-21  6:24           ` Pekka Enberg
2009-09-21  8:46             ` Mel Gorman [this message]
2009-09-21  8:30           ` Sachin Sant
2009-09-21  8:42             ` Mel Gorman
2009-09-21  9:00               ` Tejun Heo
2009-09-21  9:44                 ` Mel Gorman
2009-09-21  9:53                   ` Tejun Heo
2009-09-21 10:04                     ` Mel Gorman
2009-09-21  9:02               ` Sachin Sant
2009-09-21  9:09                 ` Mel Gorman
2009-09-21 13:04               ` Mel Gorman
2009-09-21 13:31                 ` Pekka Enberg
2009-09-21 13:45                 ` Tejun Heo
2009-09-21 13:57                   ` Mel Gorman
2009-09-21 23:54                     ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2009-09-20 14:04     ` Mel Gorman
2009-09-18 19:34 ` [PATCH 2/3] slqb: Treat pages freed on a memoryless node as local node Mel Gorman
2009-09-18 21:01   ` Christoph Lameter
2009-09-19 11:46     ` Mel Gorman
2009-09-21 17:34       ` Lee Schermerhorn
2009-09-22 13:33         ` Mel Gorman
2009-09-22 18:29           ` Lee Schermerhorn
2009-09-18 19:34 ` [PATCH 3/3] slqb: Allow SLQB to be used on PPC and S390 Mel Gorman

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20090921084644.GD12726@csn.ul.ie \
    --to=mel@csn.ul.ie \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=cl@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=npiggin@suse.de \
    --cc=penberg@cs.helsinki.fi \
    --cc=sachinp@in.ibm.com \
    --cc=tj@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).