From: Mel Gorman <mel@csn.ul.ie>
To: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
Cc: Sachin Sant <sachinp@in.ibm.com>,
Pekka Enberg <penberg@cs.helsinki.fi>,
Nick Piggin <npiggin@suse.de>,
Christoph Lameter <cl@linux-foundation.org>,
heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-mm@kvack.org, Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] slqb: Do not use DEFINE_PER_CPU for per-node data
Date: Mon, 21 Sep 2009 14:57:33 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20090921135733.GP12726@csn.ul.ie> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4AB78385.6020900@kernel.org>
On Mon, Sep 21, 2009 at 10:45:41PM +0900, Tejun Heo wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Mel Gorman wrote:
> > This latter guess was close to the mark but not for the reasons I was
> > guessing. There isn't magic per-cpu-area-freeing going on. Once I examined
> > the implementation of per-cpu data, it was clear that the per-cpu areas for
> > the node IDs were never being allocated in the first place on PowerPC. It's
> > probable that this never worked but that it took a long time before SLQB
> > was run on a memoryless configuration.
>
> Ah... okay, so node id was being used to access percpu memory but the
> id wasn't in cpu_possible_map. Yeah, that will access weird places in
> between proper percpu areas.
Indeed
> I never thought about that. I'll add
> debug version of percpu access macros which check that the offset and
> cpu make sense so that things like this can be caught easier.
>
It would not hurt. I consider the per-node usage model to be rare but
it's possible there are issues with CPU hotplug and per-cpu data lurking
around that such a debug patch might catch.
> As Pekka suggested, using MAX_NUMNODES seems more appropriate tho
> although it's suboptimal in that it would waste memory and more
> importantly not use node-local memory. :-(
>
If the per-cpu macros are to be used for per-node data, it would need to
be generalised to encompass more IDs than what is in cpu_possible_map.
It depends on how much demand there is for per-node data and how much it
helps. I have no data on that.
> Sachin, does the hang you're seeing also disappear with Mel's patches?
>
Sachin should be enjoying his holiday and I'm hogging his machine at the
moment. However, I can report that with this patch applied as well as the
remote-free patch that the machine locks up after a random amount of time
has passed and doesn't respond to sysrq. Setting
CONFIG_RCU_CPU_STALL_DETECTOR=y didn't help throw up an error. Will
enable a few other debug options related to stall detection and see does
it pop out.
--
Mel Gorman
Part-time Phd Student Linux Technology Center
University of Limerick IBM Dublin Software Lab
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-09-21 13:57 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 29+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-09-18 19:34 [RFC PATCH 0/3] Hatchet job for SLQB on memoryless configurations Mel Gorman
2009-09-18 19:34 ` [PATCH 1/3] slqb: Do not use DEFINE_PER_CPU for per-node data Mel Gorman
2009-09-20 8:45 ` Pekka Enberg
2009-09-20 10:00 ` Tejun Heo
2009-09-20 10:12 ` Pekka Enberg
2009-09-20 15:55 ` Tejun Heo
2009-09-21 6:24 ` Pekka Enberg
2009-09-21 8:46 ` Mel Gorman
2009-09-21 8:30 ` Sachin Sant
2009-09-21 8:42 ` Mel Gorman
2009-09-21 9:00 ` Tejun Heo
2009-09-21 9:44 ` Mel Gorman
2009-09-21 9:53 ` Tejun Heo
2009-09-21 10:04 ` Mel Gorman
2009-09-21 9:02 ` Sachin Sant
2009-09-21 9:09 ` Mel Gorman
2009-09-21 13:04 ` Mel Gorman
2009-09-21 13:31 ` Pekka Enberg
2009-09-21 13:45 ` Tejun Heo
2009-09-21 13:57 ` Mel Gorman [this message]
2009-09-21 23:54 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2009-09-20 14:04 ` Mel Gorman
2009-09-18 19:34 ` [PATCH 2/3] slqb: Treat pages freed on a memoryless node as local node Mel Gorman
2009-09-18 21:01 ` Christoph Lameter
2009-09-19 11:46 ` Mel Gorman
2009-09-21 17:34 ` Lee Schermerhorn
2009-09-22 13:33 ` Mel Gorman
2009-09-22 18:29 ` Lee Schermerhorn
2009-09-18 19:34 ` [PATCH 3/3] slqb: Allow SLQB to be used on PPC and S390 Mel Gorman
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20090921135733.GP12726@csn.ul.ie \
--to=mel@csn.ul.ie \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=benh@kernel.crashing.org \
--cc=cl@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=npiggin@suse.de \
--cc=penberg@cs.helsinki.fi \
--cc=sachinp@in.ibm.com \
--cc=tj@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).