linux-mm.kvack.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Mel Gorman <mel@csn.ul.ie>
To: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
Cc: Nick Piggin <npiggin@suse.de>,
	Pekka Enberg <penberg@cs.helsinki.fi>,
	Christoph Lameter <cl@linux-foundation.org>,
	heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com, sachinp@in.ibm.com,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org,
	Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] powerpc: Allocate per-cpu areas for node IDs for SLQB to use as per-node areas
Date: Tue, 22 Sep 2009 10:32:20 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20090922093220.GB12254@csn.ul.ie> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4AB813F3.8060102@kernel.org>

On Tue, Sep 22, 2009 at 09:01:55AM +0900, Tejun Heo wrote:
> Mel Gorman wrote:
> > diff --git a/arch/powerpc/kernel/setup_64.c b/arch/powerpc/kernel/setup_64.c
> > index 1f68160..a5f52d4 100644
> > --- a/arch/powerpc/kernel/setup_64.c
> > +++ b/arch/powerpc/kernel/setup_64.c
> > @@ -588,6 +588,26 @@ void __init setup_per_cpu_areas(void)
> >  		paca[i].data_offset = ptr - __per_cpu_start;
> >  		memcpy(ptr, __per_cpu_start, __per_cpu_end - __per_cpu_start);
> >  	}
> > +#ifdef CONFIG_SLQB
> > +	/* 
> > +	 * SLQB abuses DEFINE_PER_CPU to setup a per-node area. This trick
> > +	 * assumes that ever node ID will have a CPU of that ID to match.
> > +	 * On systems with memoryless nodes, this may not hold true. Hence,
> > +	 * we take a second pass initialising a "per-cpu" area for node-ids
> > +	 * that SLQB can use
> > +	 */
> > +	for_each_node_state(i, N_NORMAL_MEMORY) {
> > +
> > +		/* Skip node IDs that a valid CPU id exists for */
> > +		if (paca[i].data_offset)
> > +			continue;
> > +
> > +		ptr = alloc_bootmem_pages_node(NODE_DATA(cpu_to_node(i)), size);
> > +
> > +		paca[i].data_offset = ptr - __per_cpu_start;
> > +		memcpy(ptr, __per_cpu_start, __per_cpu_end - __per_cpu_start);
> > +	}
> > +#endif /* CONFIG_SLQB */
> >  }
> >  #endif
> 
> Eh... I don't know.  This seems too hacky to me. 

I've come around to this opinion as well. There are probably too many
other architectures and corners where this is gotten wrong and a more
fundamental fix is needed for SLQB to be able to use this hack.

> Why not just
> allocate pointer array of MAX_NUMNODES and allocate per-node memory
> there? 

That's what patch 1 from V1 did. I'll make it Patch 1 for V3.

> This will be slightly more expensive but I doubt it will be
> noticeable.  The only extra overhead is the cachline footprint for the
> extra array.
> 

I'll compare the vmlinux's to quantify the exact penalty but basically,
I don't think it can be avoided at this point.

Thanks.

-- 
Mel Gorman
Part-time Phd Student                          Linux Technology Center
University of Limerick                         IBM Dublin Software Lab

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>

  reply	other threads:[~2009-09-22  9:32 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 35+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2009-09-21 16:10 [RFC PATCH 0/3] Fix SLQB on memoryless configurations V2 Mel Gorman
2009-09-21 16:10 ` [PATCH 1/3] powerpc: Allocate per-cpu areas for node IDs for SLQB to use as per-node areas Mel Gorman
2009-09-21 17:17   ` Daniel Walker
2009-09-21 17:24     ` Randy Dunlap
2009-09-21 17:29       ` Daniel Walker
2009-09-21 17:42     ` Mel Gorman
2009-09-22  0:01   ` Tejun Heo
2009-09-22  9:32     ` Mel Gorman [this message]
2009-09-21 16:10 ` [PATCH 2/3] slqb: Record what node is local to a kmem_cache_cpu Mel Gorman
2009-09-21 16:10 ` [PATCH 3/3] slqb: Allow SLQB to be used on PPC Mel Gorman
2009-09-22  9:30   ` Heiko Carstens
2009-09-22  9:32     ` Mel Gorman
2009-09-21 17:46 ` [RFC PATCH 0/3] Fix SLQB on memoryless configurations V2 Mel Gorman
2009-09-21 17:54   ` Christoph Lameter
2009-09-21 18:05     ` Pekka Enberg
2009-09-21 18:07     ` Mel Gorman
2009-09-21 18:17       ` Christoph Lameter
2009-09-22 10:05         ` Mel Gorman
2009-09-22 10:21           ` Pekka Enberg
2009-09-22 10:24             ` Mel Gorman
2009-09-22  5:03       ` Sachin Sant
2009-09-22 10:07         ` Mel Gorman
2009-09-22 12:55         ` Mel Gorman
2009-09-22 13:05           ` Sachin Sant
2009-09-22 13:20             ` Mel Gorman
     [not found]               ` <363172900909220629j2f5174cbo9fe027354948d37@mail.gmail.com>
2009-09-22 13:38                 ` Mel Gorman
2009-09-22 23:07                 ` Christoph Lameter
2009-09-22  0:00 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2009-09-22  0:19   ` David Rientjes
2009-09-22  6:30     ` Christoph Lameter
2009-09-22  7:59       ` David Rientjes
2009-09-22  8:11         ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2009-09-22  8:44           ` David Rientjes
2009-09-22 15:26   ` Mel Gorman
2009-09-22 17:31     ` David Rientjes

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20090922093220.GB12254@csn.ul.ie \
    --to=mel@csn.ul.ie \
    --cc=benh@kernel.crashing.org \
    --cc=cl@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=npiggin@suse.de \
    --cc=penberg@cs.helsinki.fi \
    --cc=sachinp@in.ibm.com \
    --cc=tj@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).