linux-mm.kvack.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Andi Kleen <andi@firstfloor.org>
To: Lee Schermerhorn <lee.schermerhorn@hp.com>
Cc: linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-numa@vger.kernel.org,
	akpm@linux-foundation.org, Mel Gorman <mel@csn.ul.ie>,
	Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@oracle.com>,
	Nishanth Aravamudan <nacc@us.ibm.com>,
	David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com>, Adam Litke <agl@us.ibm.com>,
	Andy Whitcroft <apw@canonical.com>,
	eric.whitney@hp.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 11/11] hugetlb:  offload per node attribute registrations
Date: Tue, 6 Oct 2009 18:01:39 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20091006160139.GT1656@one.firstfloor.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20091006031924.22576.35018.sendpatchset@localhost.localdomain>

On Mon, Oct 05, 2009 at 11:19:24PM -0400, Lee Schermerhorn wrote:
> [PATCH 11/11] hugetlb:  offload [un]registration of sysfs attr to worker thread
> 
> Against:  2.6.31-mmotm-090925-1435
> 
> New in V6
> 
> V7:  + remove redundant check for memory{ful|less} node from 
>        node_hugetlb_work().  Rely on [added] return from
>        hugetlb_register_node() to differentiate between transitions
>        to/from memoryless state.
> 
> This patch offloads the registration and unregistration of per node
> hstate sysfs attributes to a worker thread rather than attempt the
> allocation/attachment or detachment/freeing of the attributes in 
> the context of the memory hotplug handler.

Why this change? The hotplug handler should be allowed to sleep, shouldn't it?

> N.B.,  Only tested build, boot, libhugetlbfs regression.
>        i.e., no memory hotplug testing.

Yes, you have to because I know for a fact it's broken (outside your code) :)

-Andi

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>

  reply	other threads:[~2009-10-06 16:01 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 32+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2009-10-06  3:17 [PATCH 0/11] hugetlb: V9 numa control of persistent huge pages alloc/free Lee Schermerhorn
2009-10-06  3:17 ` [PATCH 1/11] hugetlb: rework hstate_next_node_* functions Lee Schermerhorn
2009-10-06  3:17 ` [PATCH 2/11] hugetlb: add nodemask arg to huge page alloc, free and surplus adjust fcns Lee Schermerhorn
2009-10-06  9:09   ` David Rientjes
2009-10-07  3:26   ` David Rientjes
2009-10-07 14:13     ` Lee Schermerhorn
2009-10-06  3:17 ` [PATCH 3/11] hugetlb: factor init_nodemask_of_node Lee Schermerhorn
2009-10-07  3:21   ` David Rientjes
2009-10-06  3:18 ` [PATCH 4/11] hugetlb: derive huge pages nodes allowed from task mempolicy Lee Schermerhorn
2009-10-07  3:26   ` David Rientjes
2009-10-07 16:30     ` Lee Schermerhorn
2009-10-07 20:09       ` David Rientjes
2009-10-06  3:18 ` [PATCH 5/11] hugetlb: accomodate reworked NODEMASK_ALLOC Lee Schermerhorn
2009-10-06  3:18 ` [PATCH 6/11] hugetlb: add generic definition of NUMA_NO_NODE Lee Schermerhorn
2009-10-06  9:28   ` David Rientjes
2009-10-06  3:18 ` [PATCH 7/11] hugetlb: add per node hstate attributes Lee Schermerhorn
2009-10-07  4:04   ` David Rientjes
2009-10-06  3:18 ` [PATCH 8/11] hugetlb: update hugetlb documentation for NUMA controls Lee Schermerhorn
2009-10-06  3:18 ` [PATCH 9/11] hugetlb: use only nodes with memory for huge pages Lee Schermerhorn
2009-10-06  3:18 ` [PATCH 10/11] hugetlb: handle memory hot-plug events Lee Schermerhorn
2009-10-07  4:12   ` David Rientjes
2009-10-06  3:19 ` [PATCH 11/11] hugetlb: offload per node attribute registrations Lee Schermerhorn
2009-10-06 16:01   ` Andi Kleen [this message]
2009-10-06 16:28     ` Lee Schermerhorn
2009-10-06 16:46       ` Andi Kleen
2009-10-06 17:57         ` Lee Schermerhorn
2009-10-07  8:24   ` [patch] mm: clear node in N_HIGH_MEMORY and stop kswapd when all memory is offlined David Rientjes
2009-10-07 14:25     ` Christoph Lameter
2009-10-07 16:48     ` Lee Schermerhorn
2009-10-07 19:53       ` David Rientjes
2009-10-06 16:02 ` [PATCH 0/11] hugetlb: V9 numa control of persistent huge pages alloc/free Andi Kleen
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2009-09-15 20:43 [PATCH 0/11] hugetlb: V7 constrain allocation/free based on task mempolicy Lee Schermerhorn
2009-09-15 20:45 ` [PATCH 11/11] hugetlb: offload per node attribute registrations Lee Schermerhorn

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20091006160139.GT1656@one.firstfloor.org \
    --to=andi@firstfloor.org \
    --cc=agl@us.ibm.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=apw@canonical.com \
    --cc=eric.whitney@hp.com \
    --cc=lee.schermerhorn@hp.com \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=linux-numa@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mel@csn.ul.ie \
    --cc=nacc@us.ibm.com \
    --cc=randy.dunlap@oracle.com \
    --cc=rientjes@google.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).