From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail190.messagelabs.com (mail190.messagelabs.com [216.82.249.51]) by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 497636B0044 for ; Thu, 17 Dec 2009 12:53:47 -0500 (EST) Date: Thu, 17 Dec 2009 18:53:39 +0100 From: Andi Kleen Subject: Re: [mm][RFC][PATCH 0/11] mm accessor updates. Message-ID: <20091217175338.GL9804@basil.fritz.box> References: <20091216120011.3eecfe79.kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com> <20091216101107.GA15031@basil.fritz.box> <20091216191312.f4655dac.kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com> <20091216102806.GC15031@basil.fritz.box> <20091216193109.778b881b.kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com> <1261004224.21028.500.camel@laptop> <20091217084046.GA9804@basil.fritz.box> <1261039534.27920.67.camel@laptop> <20091217085430.GG9804@basil.fritz.box> <20091217144551.GA6819@linux.vnet.ibm.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20091217144551.GA6819@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org To: "Paul E. McKenney" Cc: Andi Kleen , Peter Zijlstra , KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , "linux-mm@kvack.org" , cl@linux-foundation.org, "akpm@linux-foundation.org" , "mingo@elte.hu" , minchan.kim@gmail.com List-ID: > OK, I have to ask... > > Why not just use the already-existing SRCU in this case? You right, SRCU could work. Still needs a lot more work of course. -Andi -- ak@linux.intel.com -- Speaking for myself only. -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: email@kvack.org