From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail190.messagelabs.com (mail190.messagelabs.com [216.82.249.51]) by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) with SMTP id D88976B0044 for ; Sun, 20 Dec 2009 13:40:36 -0500 (EST) Date: Sun, 20 Dec 2009 19:39:43 +0100 From: Andrea Arcangeli Subject: Re: [PATCH 28 of 28] memcg huge memory Message-ID: <20091220183943.GA6429@random.random> References: <20091218103312.2f61bbfc.kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com> <20091218160437.GP29790@random.random> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org To: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki Cc: linux-mm@kvack.org, Marcelo Tosatti , Adam Litke , Avi Kivity , Izik Eidus , Hugh Dickins , Nick Piggin , Rik van Riel , Mel Gorman , Andi Kleen , Dave Hansen , Benjamin Herrenschmidt , Ingo Molnar , Mike Travis , Christoph Lameter , Chris Wright , Andrew Morton List-ID: On Sat, Dec 19, 2009 at 08:06:50AM +0900, KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki wrote: > My intentsion was adding a patch for adding "pagesize" parameters > to charge/uncharge function may be able to reduce size of changes. There's no need for that as my patch shows and I doubt it makes a lot of difference at runtime, but it's up to you, I'm neutral. I suggest is that you send me a patch and I integrate and use your version ;). I'll take care of adapting huge_memory.c myself if you want to add the size param to the outer call. Now if I manage to finish this khugepaged I could do a new submit with a new round of changes and cleanups and stats (latest polishing especially thanks to Mel review). Thanks, Andrea -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: email@kvack.org