linux-mm.kvack.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@sisk.pl>
To: KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com>
Cc: Minchan Kim <minchan.kim@gmail.com>,
	Maxim Levitsky <maximlevitsky@gmail.com>,
	linux-mm <linux-mm@kvack.org>,
	linux-pm@lists.linux-foundation.org,
	LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [linux-pm] [RFC][PATCH] PM: Force GFP_NOIO during suspend/resume (was: Re: Memory allocations in .suspend became very unreliable)
Date: Mon, 18 Jan 2010 22:06:36 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <201001182206.36365.rjw@sisk.pl> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20100118111703.AE36.A69D9226@jp.fujitsu.com>

On Monday 18 January 2010, KOSAKI Motohiro wrote:
> > Index: linux-2.6/mm/page_alloc.c
> > ===================================================================
> > --- linux-2.6.orig/mm/page_alloc.c
> > +++ linux-2.6/mm/page_alloc.c
> > @@ -1963,10 +1963,13 @@ __alloc_pages_nodemask(gfp_t gfp_mask, u
> >  	page = get_page_from_freelist(gfp_mask|__GFP_HARDWALL, nodemask, order,
> >  			zonelist, high_zoneidx, ALLOC_WMARK_LOW|ALLOC_CPUSET,
> >  			preferred_zone, migratetype);
> > -	if (unlikely(!page))
> > +	if (unlikely(!page)) {
> > +		mm_lock_suspend(gfp_mask);
> >  		page = __alloc_pages_slowpath(gfp_mask, order,
> >  				zonelist, high_zoneidx, nodemask,
> >  				preferred_zone, migratetype);
> > +		mm_unlock_suspend(gfp_mask);
> > +	}
> >  
> >  	trace_mm_page_alloc(page, order, gfp_mask, migratetype);
> >  	return page;
> 
> I think we don't need read side lock at all. generally, no lock might makes race.
> But in this case, changing gfp_allowed_mask and nvidia suspend method should be
> serialized higher level. Why the above two code need to run concurrently?

The changing of gfp_allowed_mask is serialized with the suspend of devices,
so there's no concurrency here.

I was concerned about another problem, though, which is what happens if the
suspend process runs in parallel with a memory allocation that started earlier
and happens to do some I/O.  I that case the suspend process doesn't know
about the I/O done by the mm subsystem and may disturb it in principle.

That said, perhaps that should be a concern for the block devices subsystem to
prevent such situations from happening.

So, perhaps I'll remove the reader-side lock altogether and go back to
something like the first version of the patch.

Rafael

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>

  reply	other threads:[~2010-01-18 21:05 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 58+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <1263549544.3112.10.camel@maxim-laptop>
     [not found] ` <1263678289.4276.4.camel@maxim-laptop>
     [not found]   ` <201001162317.39940.rjw@sisk.pl>
2010-01-17  0:38     ` [RFC][PATCH] PM: Force GFP_NOIO during suspend/resume (was: Re: [linux-pm] Memory allocations in .suspend became very unreliable) Rafael J. Wysocki
2010-01-17  1:24       ` Oliver Neukum
2010-01-17 13:27         ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2010-01-17 13:36           ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2010-01-17 18:58           ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2010-01-17 23:00             ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2010-01-18  7:53               ` Oliver Neukum
2010-01-18 16:17                 ` [linux-pm] [RFC][PATCH] PM: Force GFP_NOIO during suspend/resume (was: " Alan Stern
2010-01-18 20:59                   ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2010-01-19 15:13                     ` Alan Stern
2010-01-18 20:56                 ` [RFC][PATCH] PM: Force GFP_NOIO during suspend/resume (was: Re: [linux-pm] " Rafael J. Wysocki
2010-01-18 21:55               ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2010-01-18 23:33                 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2010-01-17 13:55       ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2010-01-17 16:21         ` [linux-pm] [RFC][PATCH] PM: Force GFP_NOIO during suspend/resume (was: " Minchan Kim
2010-01-17 16:23           ` Minchan Kim
2010-01-18  0:25           ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2010-01-18  2:20             ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2010-01-18 21:06               ` Rafael J. Wysocki [this message]
2010-01-19  9:15                 ` Oliver Neukum
2010-01-19 20:34                   ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2010-01-18 17:00         ` [RFC][PATCH] PM: Force GFP_NOIO during suspend/resume (was: Re: [linux-pm] " Oliver Neukum
2010-01-18 20:41           ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2010-01-19  9:25             ` Oliver Neukum
2010-01-19 20:37               ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2010-01-20 14:05                 ` Oliver Neukum
2010-01-20 21:13                   ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2010-01-18  2:16       ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2010-01-18 20:55         ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2010-01-19  1:19           ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2010-01-19  3:19             ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2010-01-19  9:04               ` Bastien ROUCARIES
2010-01-19 23:17                 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2010-01-20 11:31                   ` Oliver Neukum
2010-01-20 21:11                     ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2010-01-20 21:12                     ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2010-01-19 20:47               ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2010-01-20  0:33                 ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2010-01-20 21:21                   ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2010-01-21  0:47                     ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2010-01-21 20:21                       ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2010-01-21 20:42                         ` [linux-pm] [RFC][PATCH] PM: Force GFP_NOIO during suspend/resume (was: " Nigel Cunningham
2010-01-21 21:38                           ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2010-01-22  1:31                         ` [RFC][PATCH] PM: Force GFP_NOIO during suspend/resume (was: Re: [linux-pm] " KOSAKI Motohiro
2010-01-22  1:42                           ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2010-01-22 10:11                             ` Maxim Levitsky
2010-01-22 21:19                               ` [Update][PATCH] MM / PM: Force GFP_NOIO during suspend/hibernation and resume Rafael J. Wysocki
2010-01-23  9:29                                 ` Maxim Levitsky
2010-01-25 21:49                                   ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2010-01-25 21:52                                     ` Alexey Starikovskiy
2010-01-30 18:56                                       ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2010-01-30 20:42                                         ` Maxim Levitsky
2010-01-30 20:53                                           ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2010-01-22 20:58                           ` [RFC][PATCH] PM: Force GFP_NOIO during suspend/resume (was: Re: [linux-pm] Memory allocations in .suspend became very unreliable) Rafael J. Wysocki
2010-01-30 15:46       ` Maxim Levitsky
2010-01-30 18:47         ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2010-01-30 20:37           ` Maxim Levitsky
2010-02-01 19:51             ` Maxim Levitsky

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=201001182206.36365.rjw@sisk.pl \
    --to=rjw@sisk.pl \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=linux-pm@lists.linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=maximlevitsky@gmail.com \
    --cc=minchan.kim@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).