From: Wu Fengguang <fengguang.wu@intel.com>
To: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com>
Cc: Nick Piggin <npiggin@suse.de>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>, Andi Kleen <andi@firstfloor.org>,
Hugh Dickins <hugh.dickins@tiscali.co.uk>,
Christoph Lameter <cl@linux-foundation.org>,
Linux Memory Management List <linux-mm@kvack.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5/8] vmalloc: simplify vread()/vwrite()
Date: Thu, 21 Jan 2010 13:05:21 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20100121050521.GB24236@localhost> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20100119112343.04f4eff5.kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com>
On Mon, Jan 18, 2010 at 07:23:43PM -0700, KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki wrote:
> On Tue, 19 Jan 2010 09:33:03 +0800
> Wu Fengguang <fengguang.wu@intel.com> wrote:
> > > The whole thing looks stupid though, apparently kmap is used to avoid "the
> > > lock". But the lock is already held. We should just use the vmap
> > > address.
> >
> > Yes. I wonder why Kame introduced kmap_atomic() in d0107eb07 -- given
> > that he at the same time fixed the order of removing vm_struct and
> > vmap in dd32c279983b.
> >
> Hmm...I must check my thinking again before answering..
>
> vmalloc/vmap is constructed by 2 layer.
> - vmalloc layer....guarded by vmlist_lock.
> - vmap layer ....gurderd by purge_lock. etc.
>
> Now, let's see how vmalloc() works. It does job in 2 steps.
> vmalloc():
> - allocate vmalloc area to the list under vmlist_lock.
> - map pages.
> vfree()
> - free vmalloc area from the list under vmlist_lock.
> - unmap pages under purge_lock.
>
> Now. vread(), vwrite() just take vmlist_lock, doesn't take purge_lock().
> It walks page table and find pte entry, page, kmap and access it.
>
> Oh, yes. It seems it's safe without kmap. But My concern is percpu allocator.
>
> It uses get_vm_area() and controls mapped pages by themselves and
> map/unmap pages by with their own logic. vmalloc.c is just used for
> alloc/free virtual address.
>
> Now, vread()/vwrite() just holds vmlist_lock() and walk page table
> without no guarantee that the found page is stably mapped. So, I used kmap.
>
> If I miss something, I'm very sorry to add such kmap.
Ah Thanks for explanation!
I did some audit and find that
- set_memory_uc(), set_memory_array_uc(), set_pages_uc(),
set_pages_array_uc() are called EFI code and various video drivers,
all of them don't touch HIGHMEM RAM
- Kame: ioremap() won't allow remap of physical RAM
So kmap_atomic() is safe. Let's just settle on this patch?
Thanks,
Fengguang
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-01-21 5:05 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-01-13 13:53 [PATCH 0/8] devmem/kmem/kcore fixes, cleanups and hwpoison checks Wu Fengguang
2010-01-13 13:53 ` [PATCH 1/8] vfs: fix too big f_pos handling Wu Fengguang
2010-01-13 13:53 ` [PATCH 2/8] devmem: check vmalloc address on kmem read/write Wu Fengguang
2010-01-13 13:53 ` [PATCH 3/8] devmem: fix kmem write bug on memory holes Wu Fengguang
2010-01-13 13:53 ` [PATCH 4/8] resources: introduce generic page_is_ram() Wu Fengguang
2010-01-13 14:29 ` Américo Wang
2010-01-14 3:29 ` Wu Fengguang
2010-01-13 13:53 ` [PATCH 5/8] vmalloc: simplify vread()/vwrite() Wu Fengguang
2010-01-14 12:45 ` Nick Piggin
2010-01-18 13:35 ` Wu Fengguang
2010-01-18 14:23 ` Nick Piggin
2010-01-19 1:33 ` Wu Fengguang
2010-01-19 2:23 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2010-01-21 5:05 ` Wu Fengguang [this message]
2010-01-21 5:21 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2010-01-21 5:49 ` Wu Fengguang
2010-01-13 13:53 ` [PATCH 6/8] hwpoison: prevent /dev/kmem from accessing hwpoison pages Wu Fengguang
2010-01-13 13:53 ` [PATCH 7/8] hwpoison: prevent /dev/mem " Wu Fengguang
2010-01-13 13:53 ` [PATCH 8/8] hwpoison: prevent /dev/kcore " Wu Fengguang
2010-01-13 14:23 ` Américo Wang
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20100121050521.GB24236@localhost \
--to=fengguang.wu@intel.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=andi@firstfloor.org \
--cc=cl@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=hugh.dickins@tiscali.co.uk \
--cc=kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=npiggin@suse.de \
--cc=tj@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).