From: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
To: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com>
Cc: "linux-mm@kvack.org" <linux-mm@kvack.org>,
rientjes@google.com, minchan.kim@gmail.com,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
"balbir@linux.vnet.ibm.com" <balbir@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] oom-kill: add lowmem usage aware oom kill handling
Date: Tue, 26 Jan 2010 16:19:52 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20100126161952.ee267d1c.akpm@linux-foundation.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20100127085355.f5306e78.kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com>
On Wed, 27 Jan 2010 08:53:55 +0900
KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com> wrote:
> > Hardly anyone will know to enable
> > it so the feature won't get much testing and this binary decision
> > fractures the testing effort. It would be much better if we can get
> > everyone running the same code. I mean, if there are certain workloads
> > on certain machines with which the oom-killer doesn't behave correctly
> > then fix it!
> Yes, I think you're right. But "breaking current behaviro of our servers!"
> arguments kills all proposal to this area and this oom-killer or vmscan is
> a feature should be tested by real users. (I'll write fork-bomb detector
> and RSS based OOM again.)
Well don't break their servers then ;)
What I'm not understanding is: why is it not possible to improve the
behaviour on the affected machines without affecting the behaviour on
other machines?
What are these "servers" to which you refer? x86_32 servers, I assume
- the patch shouldn't affect 64-bit machines. Why don't they also want
this treatment and in what way does the patch "break" them?
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-01-27 0:20 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 52+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-01-21 5:59 [PATCH] oom-kill: add lowmem usage aware oom kill handling KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2010-01-21 15:18 ` Minchan Kim
2010-01-21 23:48 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2010-01-22 0:40 ` Minchan Kim
2010-01-22 1:06 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2010-01-21 15:29 ` Balbir Singh
2010-01-21 23:54 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2010-01-22 6:23 ` [PATCH v2] " KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2010-01-22 14:00 ` Minchan Kim
2010-01-22 15:16 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2010-01-22 15:41 ` Minchan Kim
2010-01-25 6:15 ` [PATCH v3] " KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2010-01-26 23:12 ` Andrew Morton
2010-01-26 23:53 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2010-01-27 0:19 ` Andrew Morton [this message]
2010-01-27 0:58 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2010-01-27 6:30 ` [PATCH v4 0/2] " KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2010-01-27 6:32 ` [PATCH v4 1/2] sysctl clean up vm related variable declarations KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2010-01-28 8:54 ` David Rientjes
2010-01-28 10:30 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2010-01-27 6:33 ` [PATCH v4 2/2] oom-kill: add lowmem usage aware oom kill handling v4 KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2010-01-28 0:12 ` [PATCH v4 0/2] oom-kill: add lowmem usage aware oom kill handling KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2010-01-27 23:56 ` [PATCH v3] " David Rientjes
2010-01-28 0:16 ` Alan Cox
2010-01-28 0:26 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2010-01-28 0:59 ` David Rientjes
2010-01-29 0:25 ` Vedran Furač
2010-01-29 0:35 ` Alan Cox
2010-01-29 0:57 ` Vedran Furač
2010-01-29 11:03 ` Alan Cox
2010-01-30 12:33 ` Vedran Furač
2010-01-30 12:59 ` Alan Cox
2010-01-30 17:30 ` Vedran Furač
2010-01-30 17:45 ` Alan Cox
2010-01-30 18:17 ` Vedran Furač
2010-01-27 23:46 ` David Rientjes
2010-01-26 23:16 ` Andrew Morton
2010-01-26 23:44 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2010-01-27 23:40 ` David Rientjes
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2010-01-29 16:11 KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2010-01-29 16:21 ` Alan Cox
2010-01-29 16:25 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2010-01-29 16:30 ` Alan Cox
2010-01-29 16:41 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2010-01-29 21:07 ` David Rientjes
2010-01-30 12:46 ` Vedran Furač
2010-01-30 22:53 ` David Rientjes
2010-01-31 20:29 ` Vedran Furač
2010-02-01 10:33 ` David Rientjes
2010-02-01 0:01 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2010-02-01 10:28 ` David Rientjes
2010-01-29 21:11 ` David Rientjes
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20100126161952.ee267d1c.akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--to=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=balbir@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=minchan.kim@gmail.com \
--cc=rientjes@google.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).